Summary
Seedlings of the cotton cultivar Sicot 1 were treated with either 1%, 2% or 5% colchicine in lanolin which was topically applied to the apical meristem four days after emergence. Of 293 1%-treated seedlings 64 survived to produce fertile C1 shoots which gave rise to 84 C2 single boll families. C2 and C3 generations were examined in field experiments for morphological variants and for a number of quantitative characters (yield components and fibre quality). No morphological mutants were seen but considerable heritable variation for metrical characters of economic importance was detected. Of 18 extreme C2 families consisting of 54 C3 progenies, 19 were shown in a replicated spaced-plant trial to be significantly different to the Sicot 1 parental material for at least one (usually more) characters. The 222 C3 progenies of the 66 non-extreme C2 families were tested in an unreplicated plot experiment and at least 14 were suspected of exhibiting variation in metrical characters. Although no light has been shed on the mechanism responsible for the production of variants by this method, it is argued that the colchicine technique results in higher levels of genetic variation than found in commercial cultivars; variation which can be readily exploited by cotton breeders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson G.F., C.J. Franzke & J.G. Ross, 1957. Differential reaction of two varieties of sorghum to colchicine treatment. J Hered. 48: 259–264.
Dirks V.A., J.G. Ross & D.D. Harpstead, 1956. Colchicine-induced true-breeding sectors in flax. J. Hered. 47: 229–233.
Downes R.W. & D.R. Marshall, 1983. Colchicine-induced variants in sunflower. Euphytica 32: 757–766.
Falconer D.S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Second edition. Longman, London.
Franzke C.J. & J.G. Ross, 1952. Colchicine-induced variants in sorghum. J. Hered. 43: 107–115.
Gilbert S.K. & F.L. Patterson, 1965. Colchicine-induced mutants in Decatur barley. Crop Sci. 5: 44–47.
Larkin P.J. & W.R. Scowcroft, 1981. Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60: 197–214.
Sanders M.E. & C.J. Franzke, 1976. Effect of temperature on origin of colchicine-induced complex mutants in sorghum. J. Hered. 67: 19–29.
Sanders M.E. & C.J. Franzke, 1980. Effect of light on origin of colchicine-induced complex mutants in sorghum. J. Hered. 71: 83–92.
Simantel G.M., J.G. Ross, C.C. Huang & H.D. Haensel, 1963. Colchicine-induced somatic chromosome reduction in sorghum. II. Induction of plants homozygous for structural chromosome markers originally heterozygous in two pairs. J. Hered. 54: 221–228.
Simantel G.M. & J.G. Ross, 1963. Colchicine-induced somatic chromosome reduction in sorghum. III. Induction of plants homozygous for structural chromosome markers in four pairs. J. Hered. 54: 277–284.
Thomson N.J., 1973a. Intra-varietal variability and response to selection in Gossypium hirsutum L. I. Phenotypic variability J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 135–145.
Thomson N.J., 1973b. Intra-varietal variability and response to selection in Gossypium hirsutum L. II. Genotypic variability. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 147–160.
Thomson N.J., 1973c. Intra-varietal variability and response to selection in Gossypium hirsutum L. III. Response to selection. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 161–170.
Thomson, N.J., 1979. Cotton. In: J.V. Lovett & A. Lazenby, (Eds) Australian Field Crops. Volume two Angus and Robertson, Sydney.
Williams E.R., 1986. Row and column designs with contiguous replicates. Aust. J. Stat. 28: 154–163.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luckett, D.J. Colchicine mutagenesis is associated with substantial heritable variation in cotton. Euphytica 42, 177–182 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042630
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042630