Skip to main content
Log in

The electroretinogram in Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective study was performed comparing the ERG results of 15 patients with Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus. Patients with fundus flavimaculatus had “fish-tail” lesions with or without macular changes, while the Stargardt's group had macular atrophy without fish-tail flecks. The mean visual acuity was 20/200 for the Stargardt's patients compared with a mean of 20/80 for the fundus flavimaculatus patients. The Stargardt's photopic and scotopic amplitudes were respectively 33% and 34% of normal, while the fundus flavimaculatus values were less impaired at 58% and 64% of normal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blacharski PA. Fundus flavimaculatus. In: Newsome DA, ed. Retinal dystrophies and degenerations. New York: Raven Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Franceschetti A. A special form of tapetoretinal degeneration: fundus flavimaculatus. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1965; 69: 1048–53.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Franceschetti A, François J. Fundus flavimaculatus. Arch Ophthalmol 1965; 25: 505–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Noble KG, Carr RE. Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 1281–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fishman GA. Fundus flavimaculatus: a clinical classification. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 94: 2061–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deutman AF. The hereditary dystrophies of the posterior pole of the eye. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1971; 100–71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moloney JBM, Mooney DJ, O'Connor MA. Retinal function in Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus. Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 96: 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Meel GJ, van Norren D. Foveal densitometry as a diagnostic technique in Stargardt's disease. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 102: 353–62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lachapelle P. Analysis of the photopic electroretinogram recorded before and after dark adaptation. Can J Ophthalmol 1987; 22: 354–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lachapelle P, Molotchnikoff S. Components of the electroretinogram: a reappraisal. Doc Ophthalmol 1986; 63: 337–48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hadden OB, Gass JDM. Fundus flavimaculatus and Stargardt's disease. Am J Ophthalmol 1976; 82: 527–39.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klein BA, Krill AE. Fundus flavimaculatus. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 64: 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gouras P, MacKay CJ. Growth in amplitude of the human cone electroretinogram with light adaptation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 625–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lachapelle, P., Little, J.M. & Roy, M.S. The electroretinogram in Stargardt's disease and fundus flavimaculatus. Doc Ophthalmol 73, 395–404 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154495

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154495

Key words

Navigation