Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The object of this study was to examine the extent of sex discrimination in the job market for accountants. The research design involved sending application letters to job advertisements appearing in the press. These letters came from males and females of varying race and marital backgrounds, although all had identical qualifications and work experience. The responses to these applications were then analyzed and formed the basis of the tests for discrimination. The results showed a significant level of discrimination against women and this was enhanced for those who were Colored, and/or those who were married and had children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buckley, J. E. Pay differences between men and women in the same job. Monthly Labor Review, 1971, 94(November), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiplin, B., & P. Sloane. Male-female earnings differences: A further analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1976, 14(March), 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wiback, K. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant résumés, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60(February), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidell, L. S. Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 1092–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M. A. Racial discrimination in the British labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1981, 34, (January), 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, R. S., & Hosek, J. Explaining male-female wage differentials for the “same” job. Journal of Human Resources, 1976, 11(Winter), 98–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J., & Stroup, A. Measurement of employment discrimination according to sex. Southern Economic Journal, 1973, 39(April), 575–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowell, R., & Prescott-Clarke, P. Racial discrimination and white-collar workers in Britain. Race, 1970, 11(April), 397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Party, Discrimination against women. London: Labour Party, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancke, R. B. Lower pay for women: A case of economic discrimination? Industrial Relations, 1971, 10(October), 316–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, N., & Smith, D. J. The extent of racial discrimination. P.E.P. Broadsheet, 1974, No. 547.

  • Mincer, J., & Polachek, S. Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy, 1974, 82(March-April), 76–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J., & Polachek, S. The theory of human capital and the earnings of women: Women's earnings re-examined. Journal of Human Resources, 1978, 13(Winter), 118–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. Survey methods in social investigation (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. M. Discrimination in recruitment: An empirical analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1978, 32(October), 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. M., & Krzystofiak, F. Self-reports versus unobtrusive measures: Balancing method variance and ethical concerns in employment discrimination research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64(February), 82–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, A. N. Questionnaire design and attitude measurement, London: Heinemann, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel, M. Equality for women. London: Fabian Society, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendel, M. Legislating for equal pay and opportunity for women in Britain. Signs, 1978, 3(Summer), 897–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B., Jerdee, T. H., & Prestwich, T. L. Dual-career marital adjustment: Potential effects of discriminatory managerial attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37(August), 565–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell, S. H., & Shapiro, D. The theory of human capital and the earnings of women: A re-examination of the evidence. Journal of Human Resources, 1978, 13(Winter), 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. A. Differential impact of negative stereotyping in employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 1972, 25, 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zikmund, W. G., Hitt, M. A., & Pickens, B. A. Influence of sex and scholastic performance on reactions to job applicant résumés. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63(April), 252–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zincone, L. H., Jr., & Close, F. A. Sex discrimination in a paramedical profession. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1978, 32(October), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

    Michael Firth

Authors
  1. Michael Firth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Firth, M. Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women. Sex Roles 8, 891–901 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287858

Keywords

Search

Navigation