Skip to main content
Log in

The Survival of antibiotic resistant and sensitiveEscherichia coli strains during anaerobic digestion

  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Total counts ofEscherichia coli were followed during anaerobic digestion of pig slurry laboratory scale digesters at 37° C. Counts decreased rapidly during anaerobic digestion. Antibiotic resistant strains in most cases appeared to be more persistent in anaerobic digesters than sensitiveE. coli strains as calculated from the decimal decay rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carrington EG (1979) The distribution of antibiotic resistant coliform bacteria in sewage and the effect of sewage treatment on their numbers. WRC Technical Report, TR117

  • Carrington EG, Harman SA, Pike B (1982) Inactivation ofSalmonella during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. J Appl Bacteriol 53:331–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke MB, Thackston EL, Malaney GW (1978) Reducing coliform andSalmonella. Water and Sewage Works, pp 50–53

  • Datta N (1962) Transmissible drug resistance in an epidemic strain ofSalmonella typhimurium. J Hygen 60:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay SP, Farias RN (1975) The inhibitory action of fatty acids on the growth ofEscherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol 91:233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster CF (1973) Sludge: waste or raw material. Effluent and Water Treatment 13:697

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldreich EE (1979) Water borne pathogens in water pollution microbiology (Michell R, ed) Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 207–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginnivan MJ, Woods JL, O'Callaghan JR (1980)Salmonella dublin in pig slurry during aerobic thermophilic treatment. J Appl Bacteriol 49:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabow WOK, Pnozosky, OW, Bungan, JS (1976) Behaviour in a river and dam of coliform bacteria with transferable or non-transferable drug resistance. Water Res 9:777–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampelmacher ED, Lucretta M, van Novor K (1972) Reduction of bacteria in sludge treatment. J Water Poll Control Federation 44 (2):1309–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton AH (1977) Animal to man transmission ofEnterobacteriaceae. Royal Society of Health Journal, pp 115–121

  • Mitsuhashi S (1969) R-Factors. J Infectious Diseases 119:89–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Reasoner DJ (1980) Microbiology: Detection of bacterial pathogens and their occurrence. J Water Pollution Control Federation 52 (6):1812–1821

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HW (1977) Antibiotic resistance bacteria and associated problems in farm animals before and after the 1969 Swann Report. Antibiotics and Antibiosis in Agriculture (Woodbine M, ed) Butterworths, p 344

  • Snedecon GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical Methods (6th ed) Iowa State University Press

  • Tappouni Y (1984) The fate ofSalmonella in anaerobic digestion (PD Thesis, University of Wales)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdul, P., Lloyd, D. The Survival of antibiotic resistant and sensitiveEscherichia coli strains during anaerobic digestion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 22, 373–377 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582423

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582423

Keywords

Navigation