Abstract
Variability and genetic divergence of 11 field populations of seven species of theCampanula elatines andC. fragilis rock-plants group from the Mediterranean and pre-Alpine areas have been studied by starch-gel electrophoretic techniques.Campanula isophylla, C. elatines, C. elatinoides, C. fragilis subsp.fragilis and subs.cavolinii, C. garganica were collected in Italy, whilstC. fenestrellata subsp.istriaca andC. portenschlagiana came from W. Jugoslavia. Twelve enzymatic loci for each population were genetically analysed: PGI-1 and 2, PGM-2, IDH-1 and -2, SKDH, ME, ADH, GOT-2, MPI-1 and -2, SOD-1. The genetic distances among the above mentioned entities have been calculated by Nei's index and depicted in a dendrogram.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayala, F. J., Powell, J. R., Tracey, M. L., Mourao, C. A., Perez-Salas, S., 1972: Enzyme variability in theDrosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations ofDrosophila willistoni. — Genetics70: 113–139.
Arietti, G., Fenaroli, L., Giacomini, V., 1955: Saggio su la distribuzione, ecologia e variabilità dellaCampanula elatinoides Moretti; endemismo insubrico. — Bergamo: Edizioni Orobiche.
Brewer, G., Sing, C. F., 1970: An introduction to isozyme techniques. — London, New York: Academic Press.
Brown, A. H. D., Nevo, E., Zohary, D., Dagon, O., 1978: Genetic variation in natural populations of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum). — Genetica49: 97–108.
Damboldt, J., 1965: Zytotaxonomische Revision der isophyllenCampanulae in Europa. — Bot. Jahrb.84: 302–358.
Fedorov, An. A., 1976:Campanula L. — InTutin, T. G. & al., (Eds.): Flora Europaea4: 78–89. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greuter, W., Burdet, H. H., Long, G., 1984:Campanula L. — Med Checklist1: 123–145.
Harris, H., 1966: Enzyme polymorphism in man. — Proc. Roy. Soc. London169: 298–310.
Lovasen-Eberhardt, Z., Trinajstic, I., 1978: O geografskoi distribuciji morfoloskih karakteristika vrsta serjeGarganicae rodaCampanula L. u fiori jugoslavije. — Biosistematika4: 273–280.
Nei, M., 1972: Genetic distance between populations. — Amer. Naturalist106: 238–292.
Pignatti, S., 1982:Campanula L. — InPignatti, S., (Ed.): Flora d'Italia2: 662–702. — Bologna: Edagricole.
Rothe, G., 1973: Shikimisäure-Dehydrogenase in keimenden Erbsen. — Biochem. Biophys. Pflanzen164: 475–486.
Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., Yang, S., Johnson, W. E., Gentry, J. B., 1971: Biochemical polymorphism in the genusPeromyscus. I. Variation in the old field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). — Stud. Genet.6: 49–90.
Shaw, C. R., Prasad, R., 1970: Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes. A compilation of recipies. — Biochem. Genet.4: 297–320.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frizzi, G., Tammaro, F. Electrophoretic study and genetic affinity in theCampanula elatines andC. fragilis (Campanulaceae) rock-plants group from Italy and W. Jugoslavia. Pl Syst Evol 174, 67–73 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937694
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937694