Abstract
A survey is given of the facts and fancies concerning the nonlinear Langevin or Itô equation. Actually, it is merely a pre-equation, which becomes an equation when an interpretation rule is added. The rules of Itô and Stratonovich differ, but both are mathematically consistent and therefore equally admissible conventions. The reason why they seem to lead to physical differences is that the Langevin approach used to arrive at the equation involves a tacit assumption. For systems with external noise this assumption can be justified, and it is then clear that the Stratonovich rule applies. Systems with internal noise, however, can only be properly described by a master equation and the Itô-Stratonovich controversy never enters. Afterward one is free to model the resulting fluctuations either with an Itô or a Stratonovich scheme, but that does not lead to any new information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. H. Gray and T. K. Caughey,J. Math. Phys. 44:288 (1965).
R. E. Mortensen,J. Stat. Phys. 1:271 (1969).
N. S. Goel and N. Richter-Dyn,Stochastic Models in Biology (Academic Press, New York, 1974).
K. Itô,Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 20, no. 8 (1944);22, no. 2 (1946);Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 4:1 (1951).
J. L. Doob,Stochastic Processes (Wiley, New York, 1953), pp. 273ff.
R. L. Stratonovich,SIAM J. Control 4:362 (1966);Topics in the Theory of Random Noise. I (Gordon and Breach, New York 1963), pp. 89ff.
K. Itô,Nagoya Math. J. 1:35 (1950);3:55 (1951); L. Arnold,Stochastische Differentialgleichungen (Oldenbourg, Vienna, 1973), p. 103.
P. Langevin,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 146:530 (1908); G. E. Uhlenbeck and L. Ornstein,Phys. Rev. 36:823 (1930).
B. J. West, A. R. Bulsara, K. Lindenberg, V. Seshadri, and K. E. Shuler,Physica 97A:211 (1979).
E. Wong and M. Zakai,Ann. Math. Stat. 36:1560 (1965).
D. K. C. MacDonald,Phil. Mag. 45:63 (1954);Phys. Rev. 108:541 (1957).
N. G. van Kampen, inFluctuation Phenomena in Solids, Burgess, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1965).
T. Kawakubo, S. Kabashima, and Y. Tsuchiya,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 64:150 (1978).
N. G. van Kampen,Phys. Reports 24:171 (1976).
H. Mori,Prog. Theor. Phys. 53:1617 (1975).
M. S. Green,J. Chem. Phys. 20:1281 (1952).
N. G. van Kampen, inThermodynamics and Kinetics of Biological Processes, A. I. Zotin, ed. (Moscow, 1980).
N. G. van Kampen,Can. J. Phys. 39:551 (1961); inAdvances in Chemical Physics, Vol. 34, I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1976), p. 245; R. Kubo, K. Matsuo, and K. Kitahara,J. Stat. Phys. 9:51 (1973).
Z. A. Akcasu,J. Stat. Phys. 16:33 (1977); D. Bedeaux,Phys. Lett. 62A:10 (1977).
A. Onuki,J. Stat. Phys. 19:325 (1978); P. Hanggi,Z. Phys. B36:271 (1980); see also D. L. Snyder,Random Point Processes (Wiley, New York, 1975), pp. 185ff.
E. J. McShane,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US 63:275, 1084 (1969); S. K. Srinivasan,SM Archives 3:325 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Kampen, N.G. Itô versus Stratonovich. J Stat Phys 24, 175–187 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01007642
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01007642