Abstract
In deciding the trustworthiness of eyewitness testimony, the U.S. judiciary employs as one of five criteria the witness' level of confidence demonstrated at the confrontation. A very recent laboratory study has shown that juror perceptions of witness confidence account for 50% of the variance in juror judgments as to witness accuracy. This strong faith in the adequacy of certainty as a predictor of accuracy is not at all supported by the present review of 43 separate assessments of the accuracy/confidence relation in eye- and earwitnesses. Statistical support is provided for the notion that the predictability of accuracy from overtly expressed confidence varies directly with the degree of optimality of information-processing conditions during encoding of the witnessed event, memory storage, and testing of the witness' memory. Low optimal conditions, those mitigating against the likelihood of highly reliable testimony, typically result in a zero correlation of confidence and accuracy. Using the arbitrary criterion of 70% or greater accuracy to define high optimal conditions, seven forensically relevant laboratory studies are identified, with six of them exhibiting significant positive correlations of confidence and accuracy. It is concluded, however, that no really clear criteria currently exist for distinguishing post hoc high from low optimal witnessing conditions in any particular real-life situation. Hence the judiciary should cease their reliance on witness confidence as an index of witness accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Hastie, R., Loftus, E.F., Penrod, S., & Winkler, J.D.The reliability of eyewitness testimony: Review of the psychological literature. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, 1979.
Hall, D.F., & Ostrom, T.M.Accuracy of eyewitness identification after biasing or unbiased instructions. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University, 1975.
Hosch, H.M., & Cooper, D.S.Personalism of a crime and self-monitoring as determinants of eyewitness accuracy. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at El Paso, 1980.
Malpass, R.S., & Devine, P.G.Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York, College at Plattsburgh, 1979.
Yarmey, A.D.Recognition memory for male and female faces. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, 1978.
Brigham, J.C., Snyder, L.D., Spaulding, K., & Maass, A.The accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University, 1980.
Malpass, R.S., & Devine, P.G.Guided memory in eyewitness identification. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York, College at Plattsburgh, 1980.
Sheperd, J.W., Davies, G.M., & Ellis, H.D.Identification after delay. Final grant report by the Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, to the Home Office Research Unit, 1980.
References
Brown, E.L., Deffenbacher, K.A., & Sturgill, W. Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977,62, 311–318.
Brown, R., & McNeill, D. The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 325–337.
Buckhout, R., Alper, A., Chern, S., Silverberg, G., & Slomovits, M. Determinants of eyewitness performance on a lineup.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,4, 191–192.
Buckhout, R., Figueroa, D., & Hoff, E. Eyewitness identification: Effects of suggestion and bias in identification from photographs.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 71–74.
Clifford, B.R. A critique of eyewitness research. In M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris, & R.N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press, 1978.
Clifford, B.R., & Scott, J. Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978,63, 352–359.
Dallenbach, K.M. The relation of memory error to time-interval.Psychological Review, 1913,20, 323–337.
Davies, G.M., Ellis, H.D., & Sheperd, J.W. Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation.Journal of Applied Psychology 1978,63, 180–187.
Davies, G.M., Sheperd, J.W., & Ellis, H.D. Remembering faces: Acknowledging our limitations.Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1978,18, 19–24.
Deffenbacher, K.A., Brown, E.L., & Sturgill, W. Some predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy. In M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris, & R.N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press, 1978.
Deffenbacher, K.A., Leu, J.R., & Brown, E.L. Memory for faces: Testing method, encoding strategy, and confidence.American Journal of Psychology, 1980, in press.
Egan, D., Pittner, M., & Goldstein, A.G. Eyewitness identification: Photographs vs. live models.Law and Human Behavior, 1977,1, 199–206.
Gardner, D.S. The perception and memory of witnesses.Cornell Law Quarterly, 1933,18, 391–409.
Goldstein, A.G. The fallibility of the eyewitness: Psychological evidence. In B. Sales (Ed.),Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum, 1977.
Gruneberg, M.M., & Sykes, R.N. Knowledge and retention: The feeling of knowing and reminiscence. In M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris, & R.N. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press, 1978.
Hart, J.T. Memory and the feeling of knowing experience.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965,56, 208–216.
Hilgendorf, E.L., & Irving, B.L. False positive identification.Medical Science Law, 1978,18, 255–262.
Kozlowski, L.T., & Bryant, K.J. Sense of direction, spatial orientation and cognitive maps.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 590–598.
Kreutzer, M.A., Leonard, S.C., & Flavell, J.H. An interview study of children's knowledge about memory.Monographys of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1975,40 (1, Serial No. 159).
Leippe, M.R., Wells, G.L., & Ostrom, T.M. Crime seriousness as a determinant of accuracy in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978,63, 345–351.
Levine, F.J., & Tapp, J.L. The psychology of criminal identification: The gap from Wade to Kirby.University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1973,121, 1079–1131.
Lindsay, R.C.L., Wells, G.L., & Rumpel, C.M. Can people detect eyewitness identification accuracy within and across situations?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981,66, 79–89.
Lipton, J.P. On the psychology of eyewitness testimony.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977,62, 90–95.
Loftus, E.F.Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1979.
Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G., & Burns, H.J. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 19–31.
Murdock, B.B., Jr.Human memory: Theory and data. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1974.Neil vs. Biggers. 409 U.S. 188 (1972).
Powers, P.A., Andriks, J.L., & Loftus, E.F. Eyewitness accounts of females and males.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979,64, 339–347.
Saslove, H., & Yarmey, A.D. Long-term auditory memory: Speaker identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980,65, 111–116.
Schmeck, R.R., Ribich, F., & Ramanaiah, N. Development of a self-report inventory for assessing individual differences in learning processes.Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977,1, 413–431.
Wells, G.L., Lindsay, R.C.L., & Ferguson, T.J. Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979,64, 440–448.
Whipple, G.M. The observer as reporter: A survey of the “Psychology of Testimony.”Psychological Bulletin, 1909,6, 153–170.
Yarmey, A.D. Through the looking glass: Sex differences in memory for self-facial poses.Journal of Research in Personality, 1979a,13, 450–459.
Yarmey, A.D.The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: The Free Press, 1979b.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Deffenbacher, K.A. Eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law Hum Behav 4, 243–260 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040617
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040617