Abstract
The general failure of sociologists to understand, much less accept, an evolutionary perspective on human behavior transcends mere ignorance and ideological bias, although it incorporates a good deal of both. It also includes a general anthropocentric discomfort with evolutionary thinking, a self-interested resistance to self-understanding, and a trained sociological incapacity to accept the fundamental canons of scientific theory construction: reductionism, individualism, materialism, and parsimony.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreski, Stanislav 1972 Social Sciences as Sorcery. London: Andre Deutsch.
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1978 Ecodynamics: A New Theory of Social Evolution. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Harris, Marvin 1979 Cultural Materialism. New York: Random House.
Kitcher, Philip 1985 Vaulting Ambition, Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lenski, Gerhard andJean Lenski 1987 Human Societies: An Introduction to Macrosociology. New York: McGraw Hill.
Mills, C. Wright 1956 The Sociological Imagination. New York: Grove Press.
Namboodiri, Krishnan 1988 “Ecological demography: Its place in sociology.” American Sociological Review 53:619–633.
Rossi, Alice S. 1984 “Gender and parenthood.” American Sociological Review 49:1–19.
Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1956 Fads and Fables in Modern Sociology. Chicago: Regnery.
Westermarck, Edward A. 1891 The History of Human Marriage. London: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van den Berghe, P.L. Why most sociologists don't (and won't) think evolutionarily. Sociol Forum 5, 173–185 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112591
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112591