Abstract
We prove the nonemptiness of the core of a continuum game without side payments where only small coalitions — ones bounded in absolute size of finite cardinality — are permitted. This result covers assignment games with a continuum of players and includes combinations of several assignment games, such as housing and automobile markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly 69: 9–15
Hammond P, Kaneko M, Wooders MH (1989) Continuum economies with finite coalitions: Core, equilibria, and widespread externalities. Journal of Economic Theory 49: 113–134
Kaneko M (1982) The central assignment game and the assignment markets. Journal of Mathematical Economics 10: 205–232
Kaneko M, Wooders MH (1986) The core of a game with a continuum of players and finite coalitions; the model and some results. Mathematical Social Sciences 12: 105–137
Kaneko M, Wooders MH (1989) The core of a continuum economy with widespread externalities and finite coalitions: From finite to continuum economies. Journal of Economic Theory 49:135–168
Royden HL (1963) Real analysis. MacMillan Publishing Co
Shapley LS, Shubik M (1972) The assignment game I: The core. International Journal of Game Theory 1:111–130
Shapley LS, Shubik M (1966) Quasi-cores in a monetary economy with non-convex preferences. Econometrica 34: 805–827
Wooders MH (1983) The epsilon core of a large replica game. Journal of Mathematical Economics 11: 277–300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors thank two anonymous referees for many helpful comments. The second author is indebted primarily to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for financial support and also the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaneko, M., Wooders, M.H. The nonemptiness of thef-core of a game without side payments. Int J Game Theory 25, 245–258 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01247105
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01247105