Abstract
Administrators at a large midwestern university recognized that their World Wide Web site was rapidly becoming an important factor in recruiting new students. They also expected this Web site to serve many different types of information needs for existing students, faculty, staff, and alumni. an interdisciplinary team of faculty, graduate students, and staff was formed to evaluate the existing Web site. A group from this team first conducted a needs analysis to determine the kinds of information the target population was seeking. This analysis led to the creation of a new information structure for the Web site. Usability tests of the both the new and old designs were conducted on paper. Users were able to find answers to frequently asked questions much more rapidly and successfully with the new information structure. This structure was further refined through additional usability tests conducted on the Web itself. This descriptive case study illustrates the value of user-centered design and usability testing of World Wide Web sites.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Booth, P.A. (1989). Usability in human-computer interaction. InAn introduction to human-computer interaction, (p. 103–136). East Sussex, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1990).The systematic design of instruction. (3rd ed.) New York, NY: Harper-Collins.
Dumas, J.S. & Redish, J.C. (1993).A practical guide to usability testing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Eason, K. (1988).Information technology and organisational change. London: Taylor & Francis.
Frick, T.W., Corry, M.D., Hansen, L. & Maynes, B. (1995).Design-research for the Indiana University Bloomington world wide web: The “limestone pages.” URL Address: http://education.indiana.edu/ist/faculty/iuwebrep.html.
Gould, J.D. (1988). How to design usable systems (excerpt). In R. Baecker & W. Buxton (Eds.),Readings in human-computer interaction: A multidisciplinary approach, (pp. 93–115). New York, NY: Morgan-Kaufman.
Gould, J.D. & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. In R. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. Buxton, & S. Greenberg (Eds.),Readings in human-computer interaction, toward the year 2000, (pp. 528–547). New York, NY: Morgan-Kaufman.
Hix, D. & Hartson, H.R. (1994).Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product and process. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Nielsen, J. (1994).Usability engineering. Boston, MA: AP Professional.
Norman, D.A. (1988).Design of everyday things. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994).Human-computer interaction. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Rubin, J. (1994).Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Shackel, B. (1991). Usability—context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In B. Shackel & S. Richardson (Eds.),Human factors for informatics usability, (pp. 21–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sugar, W.A. & Boling, E. (1995). User-centered innovation: A model for early usability testing.Proceedings of the 1995 Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), Anaheim, CA.
Worthen, B.R. & Sanders, J.R. (1987).Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York, NY: Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Special thanks should be given to Elizabeth Boling for her help in preparing this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corry, M.D., Frick, T.W. & Hansen, L. User-centered design and usability testing of a web site: An illustrative case study. ETR&D 45, 65–76 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299683
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299683