Abstract
‘The Natural System’ is the abstract notion of the order in living diversity. The richness and complexity of this notion is revealed by the diversity of representations of the Natural System drawn by ornithologists in the Nineteenth Century. These representations varied in overall form from stars, to circles, to maps, to evolutionary trees and cross-sections through trees. They differed in their depiction of affinity, analogy, continuity, directionality, symmetry, reticulation and branching, evolution, and morphological convergence and divergence. Some representations were two-dimensional, and some were three-dimensional; n-dimensional representations were discussed but never illustrated. The study of diagrammatic representations of the Natural System is made difficult by the frequent failure of authors to discuss them in their texts, and by the consequent problem of distinguishing features which carried meaning from arbitrary features and printing conventions which did not. Many of the systematics controversies of the last thirty years have their roots in the conceptual problems which surrounded the Natural System in the late 1800s, problems which were left unresolved when interest in higher-level systematics declined at the turn of this century.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett, P. H.: 1960, ‘A Transcription of Darwin's First Notebook on “Transmutation of Species”’,Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 122, 247–296.
Bowler, P. J.: 1989, ‘Development and Adaptation: Evolutionary Concepts in British Morphology, 1870–1914’,British Journal for the History of Science 22, 283–297.
Brady, R.: 1985, ‘On the Independence of Systematics’,Cladistics 1, 113–126.
Coleman, W.: 1971,Biology in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Darwin, C.: 1859,On the Origin of Species, John Murray, London.
de Queiroz, K.: 1988, ‘Systematics and the Darwinian Revolution’,Philosophy of Science 55, 238–259.
Fürbringer, M.: 1888, ‘Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Vögel’,Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 15.
Gaffney, E. S.: 1984, ‘Historical Analysis of Theories of Chelonian Relationship’,Systematic Zoology 33, 283–301.
Ghiselin, M. T.: 1969,The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of California Press, Berkeley. (Reprinted 1984, University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Greene, J. C. 1959,The Death of Adam, Iowa State University Press,Ames, Iowa.
Harrison, C. J. O.: 1969, ‘The Possible Affinities of the Australian Treecreepers of the GenusClimacteris’,Emu 69, 161–168.
Huxley, T. H.: 1868a, ‘On the Classification and Distribution of theAlectoromorphae andHeteromorphae’, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1868, pp. 294–319.
Huxley, T. H.: 1868b, (Letter to A. Newton)Ibis 4 (new series), 357–362.
Jardine, W.: 1858,Memoirs of High Edwin Strickland, M.A., John Van Voorst, London.
Kaup, J. J.: 1854, ‘Einige Worte über die systematische Stellung der Familie der Raben, Corvidae’,Journal für Ornithologie 2,Jahresversammlung, XLVII-LVII.
Lewis, G.: 1866,Natural History of Birds, Lectures on Ornithology in Ten Parts, Part I, J. A. Bancroft & Co., Philadelphia.
Lovejoy, A. O.: 1936,The Great Chain of Being, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Mayer, E.: 1969,Principles of Systematic Zoology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
McGowan, C.: 1982, ‘The Wing Musculature of the Brown KiwiApteryx Australis Mantelli and Its Bearing on Ratite Affinities’,Journal of Zoology 197, 173–219.
Nelson, G. G., and N. I. Platnick: 1981,Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.
O'Hara, R. J.: 1988a, ‘Homage to Clio, or, Toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology’,Systematic Zoology 37, 142–155.
O'Hara, R. J.: 1988b, ‘Diagrammatic Classifications ofBirds, 1819–1901: Views of the Natural System in 19th-Century British Ornithology’, in H. Ouellet (ed.),Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, pp. 2746–2759.
Olson, S. L.: 1987, ‘More on the Affinities of the Black-Collared Thrush of Borneo(Chlamydochaera jefferyi)’,Journal für Ornithologie 128, 246–248.
Reichenow, A.: 1882,Die Vögel der zoologischen Gärten, Verlag von L. U. Kittler, Leipzig.
Reif, W.-E.: 1983, ‘Hilgendorf's (1863) Dissertation on the Steinheim Planorbids (Gastropoda; Miocene): The Development of a Phylogenetic Research Program for Paleontology’,Paläontologische Zeitschrift 57, 7–20.
Rennie, J.: 1833,Ornithological Dictionary of British Birds, by Colonel G. Montagu, F.L.S. A New Edition, W. S. Orr and W. Smith, London.
Sharpe, R. B.: 1891,A Review of Recent Attempts to Classify Birds, Second International Ornithological Congress, Budapest.
Stevens, P. F.: 1982, ‘Augustin Augier's “Arbre Botanique” (1801), a Remarkable Early Botanical Representation of the Natural System’,Taxon 32, 203–211.
Stevens, P. F.: 1984, ‘Metaphors and Typology in the Development of Botanical Systematics 1690–1960, or the Art of Putting New Wine in Old Bottles’,Taxon 33, 169–211.
Stresemann, E.: 1975,Ornithology from Aristotle to the Present, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Strickland, H. E.: 1840, ‘Observations Upon the Affinities and Analogies of Organized Beings’,Magazine of Natural History 4,(new series), 219–226.
Strickland, H. E.: 1841, ‘On the True Method of Discovering the Natural System in Zoology and Botany’,Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6, 184–194. (‘Read before the Zoological Section at Glagow, Sept. 21, 1840.’)
Strickland, H. E.: 1844, ‘Description of a Chart of the Natural Affinities of the Insessorial Order of Birds’, Report of the Thirteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held at Cork in August 1843, Notices and Abstracts of Communications, p. 69. (Read 1843.)
Swainson, W.: 1834,A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural History, Longmans, London.
Swainson, W.: 1835,A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals, Longmans, London.
Swainson, W.: 1837,On the Natural History and Classification of Birds, Vol. II, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London.
Swainson, W. and J. Richardson: 1831,Fauna Boreali-Americana...Part Second, The Birds, John Murray, London.
Vigors, N. A.: 1824, ‘Observations on the Natural Affinities that Connect the Orders and Families of Birds’,Transactions of the Linnean Society 14, 395–517.
Voss, E. G.: 1952, ‘The History of Keys and Phylogenetic Trees in Systematic Biology’,Journal of the Scientific Laboratory, Denison University 43, 1–25.
Wallace, A. R.: 1856, ‘Attempts at a Natural Arrangement of Birds’,Annals and Magazine of Natural History, second series 18, 193–216.
Warner, D. J.: 1979,Graceanna Lewis, Scientist and Humanitarian, Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, D.C.
Wilson, H. F., and M. H. Doner: 1937,The Historical Development of Insect Classification, privately printed.
Winsor, M. P.: 1976,Starfish, Jellyfish, and the Order of Life, University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
From the symposium ‘Making Sense of Science Making Diagrams’, held at the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology meeting, London, Ontario, 1989.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'Hara, R.J. Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth century. Biol Philos 6, 255–274 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426840
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426840