Abstract
Scientific literature is expected to contain a body of knowledge that can be indexed and retrieved using references and citations. References are subtexts which refer to a supertext, that is, the body of scientific literature. TheScience Citation Index has provided an electronic representation of science at the supertextual level by aggregating the subtextual citations. As the supertext, however, becomes independently available in virtual reality (as a “hypertext”), subtext and supertext become increasingly different contexts. The dynamics of hyperlinks are expected to feedback on the system of indexing, referencing, and retrieval at the level of research practices. References can be considered as part of the retention mechanism of this evolving system of scientific communication, and citations are a codified form of referencing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arunachalam, S. (1988). Citation Analysis: Do we need a theory?Scientometrics, 43, 141–142.
Arthur, W. B. (1988), Competing technologies, In:G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, andL. Soete (Eds.),Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp. 590–607.
Arthur, W. B. (1989), Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events,Economic Journal, 99, 116–131.
Bazerman, C. (1988),Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
Blauwhof, G. (1995),The non-linear dynamics of technological developments: an exploration of telecommunications technology. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Bloor, D. (1976),Knowledge and Social Imagery. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Bruckner, E., W. Ebeling, M. A. Jiménez Montaño, A. Scharnhorst (1994), Hyperselection and innovation described by a stochastic model of technological evolution. In:L. Leydesdorff, P. Van Den Besselaar (Eds.),Evolutionary Economies and Chaos Theory: New directions in technology studies. Pinter, London, pp. 79–90.
Callon, M., J. Law, A. Rip (Eds.) (1986),Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. Macmillan, London.
Callon, M. (1988), Is there any future for scientometrics? And if yes, which one?,International Conference on STS: Book of Abstracts. Tokyo, p. 26.
Cronin, B. (1998), Metatheorizing Citation,Scientometrics, 43, 45–54.
Egghe, L. (1998), Comments on the paper of Leydesdorff “Theories of Citation”,Scientometrics, 43, 57–62.
Els, W.P. Van, C.N.M. Jansz, C. Le Pair (1989), The citation gap between printed and instrumental output of technological research: the case of the electron microscope,Scientometrics, 17, 415–425.
Etzkowitz, H., L. Leydesdorff (Eds.) (1997),Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London.
Fujigaki, Y. (1998), The Citation System: Citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous reevaluation, an a persistent knowledge accumulation,Scientometrics, 43, 77–85.
Fujigaki, Y. (1998), A Future perspective on STS and scientometrics,EASST Review, 17, No. 2, 16–19.
Garfield, E. (1975), The obliteration phenomenon,Current Contents, Nr. 51/52, 5–7.
Garfield, E. (1996), When to cite,Library Quarterly, 66, Nr. 4, 449–458.
Garfield, E. (1998), Random thoughts on citationology— Its theory and practice,Scientometrics, 43, 69–76.
Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow (1994),The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London.
Giddens, A. (1984),The Constitution of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973), The strength of weak ties,American Journal of Sociology, 78, No. 6, 1360–1380.
Kaufer, D. S., K. M. Carley (1993),Communication at a Distance: The Influence of Print on Sociocultural Organization and Change. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Kostoff, R. N., H. J. Eberhart, D. R. Toothman, R. Pellenberg (1997), Database tomography for technical intelligence: comparative roadmaps of the research impact assessment literature and the Journal of the American Chemical Society,Scientometrics, 40, 103–138.
Kostoff, R. N. (1998), The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation,Scientometrics, 43, 27–43.
Le Pair, C. (1988), The citation gap of applicable science, In:A. F. J. Van Raan (Ed.),Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier Science/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 537–553.
Leydesdorff, L. (1989), Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization,Research Policy, 18, 209–223.
Leydesdorff, L. (1995),The Challenge of Scientometrics: the Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications. DSWO, Leiden University Press, Leiden.
Leydesdorff, L. (1996), The possibility of a mathematical sociology of scientific communication,Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 27, 243–265.
Leydesdorff, L. (1997a), Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, No. 5, 418–427.
Leydesdorff, L. (1997b), The new communications regime of university-industry-government relations. In:Etzkowitz andLeydesdorff (1997), pp. 106–117.
Leydesdorff, L. (1997c), The non-linear dynamics of sociological reflections,International Sociology, 12, 25–45.
Leydesdorff, L. (1998), Theories of Citation?Scientometrics, 43, 5–25.
Leydesdorff, L. (forthcoming).Saientometorikus no chôsen: kagaku-gijyutsu-joho no jiko-soshiki-ka [The Challenge of Scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications], translated into Japanese byY. Fujigaki, T. Hayashi, H. Hirakawa, J. Makino, M. Shirabe, and H. Tomizawa.
Leydesdorff, L., S. Cozzens (1993), The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of theSCI, Scientometrics, 26, 133–154.
Leydesdorff, L., P. Van Den Besselaar (1997), Scientometrics and communication theory: Towards theoretically informed indicators,Scientometrics, 38, 155–174.
Leydesdorff, L., H. Etzkowitz (1998), The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies,Science and Public Policy, 25, 195–203.
Makino, J. (1998), Productivity of research groups: relation between citation analysis and reputation within research communities,Scientometrics, 43, 87–93.
Maturana, H. R., F. J. Varela (1980),Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Reidel, Boston.
Narin, F., D. Olivastro (1992), Status report: Linkages between technology and science,Research Policy, 21, 237–249.
Price, D. De Solla (1970), Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In:C. E. Nelson andD. K. Pollack (Eds.),Communication among Scientists and Engineers. Heath, Lexington, MA, pp. 3–22.
Rip, A. (1997), Qualitative conditions of scientometrics: The new challenges,Scientometrics, 38, 7–26.
Rousseau, R. (1997), Sitation: an exploratory study,Cybermetrics 1, Issue I, Paper 1 at http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/vlilpl.html
Rousseau, R. (1998), Citation analysis as a theory of friction or polluted air,Scientometrics, 43, 63–67.
Sahal, D. (1985), Technological guideposts and innovation avenues,Research Policy, 14, 61–82.
Scharnhorst, A. (1998), Citation—networks, science landscapes, and evolutionary strategies,Scientometrics, 43, 95–139.
Small, H. (1998), Citations and consilience in science.Scientometrics, 43, 143–148.
Stichweh, R. (1984),Zur Entstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Physik in Deutschland, 1740–1890, Suhrkamp, Prankfurt a.M.
Swanson, D. R. (1990), Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge,Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc., 78, 29–37.
Van Alstyne, M., E. Brynjlofsson (1996), Could the Internet balkanize science?Science, 247 (29th November), 1479–1480.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998), In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much,Scientometrics, 43, 129–148.
Vinkler, P. (1998), Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives toward referencing: The reference threshold model,Scientometrics, 43, 107–127.
Watts, D. J., S. H. Strogatz (1998), Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks,Nature 393 (4 June), 440–442.
Wouters, P. (1997), Citation cycles and peer review cycles.Scientometrics, 38, 39–55.
Wouters, P. (1998), The signs of science,Scientometrics, 41, 225–241.
Zuckerman, H., R. K. Merton (1971), Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalization, structure and functions of the referree system,Minerva, 9, 66–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leydesdorff, L., Wouters, P. Between texts and contexts: Advances in theories of citation? (A rejoinder). Scientometrics 44, 169–182 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457378
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457378