Skip to main content
Log in

Inter-market competition for exchange traded funds

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine how the different mix of informed and liquidity trading in the market for ETFs affects the nature of inter-market competition. We find that both the characteristics of the securities and the structures of the competing markets jointly determine the nature of inter-market competition. Given the superior execution quality on the ECNs and the low adverse selection costs in the ETF market, anonymous market such as the ECNs, attract both liquidity and informed traders. We also find that markets compete in a subset of ETFs. In addition, we find that quotebased competition is prevalent in the market for ETFs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Admati, A. and P. Pfleiderer. 1988. “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability.”Review of Financial Studies 1: 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, M. J. 1997. “Bid-Ask Spreads and the Avoidance of Odd-Eights Quotes on Nasdaq: An Examination of Exchange Listings.”Journal of Financial Economics 45: 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, M. J., T. Hendershott and D. T. McCormick. 2003. “Competition Among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Communications Networks.”Journal of Finance 58: 2637–2365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battalio, R., B. Hatch, and R. Jennings. 2000. “Dimensions of Best Executions for Market Orders: Assessing Differences Between the NYSE and the Nasdaq Third Market” Working paper Indiana University.

  • Bessembinder, H. 1999. “Trade Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE: A Post-Reform Comparison.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 34: 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder, H. 2003. “Quote-Based Competition and Trade Execution Costs in NYSE-Listed Stocks.”Journal of Financial Economics 70: 385–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder, H. and H. M. Kaufman. 1997. “A Comparison of Trade Execution Costs for NYSE and NASDAQ-Listed Stocks.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32: 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessembinder, H. and H. M. Kaufman. 1997b. “Cross-Exchange Comparison of Execution Costs and Information Flow for NYSE-Listed Stocks.”Journal of Financial Economics 46: 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, M. E. and M. A. Goldstein. 1997. “Quotes, Order Flow, and Price Discovery.”Journal of Finance 52: 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer, B. and E. Boehmer. 2003. “Trading Your Neighbor’s ETFs: Competition or Fragmentation?.”Journal of Banking and Finance 27: 1667–1703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer, E. 2003. “Dimensions of Execution Quality: Recent Evidence for U.S. Equity Markets.”Journal of Financial Economics 78: 553–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer, E., R. Jennings, and L. Wei. 2007. “Public Disclosure and Private Decisions: Equity Market Execution Quality and Order Routing.”Review of Financial Studies 20: 315–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhry, B. and V. Nanda. 1991. “Multimarket Trading and Market Liquidity.”Review of Financial Studies 4: 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, W. G. and R. D. Huang. 1994. “Market Structures and Liquidity: A Transaction Data Study of Exchange Listings.”Journal of Financial Intermediation 3: 300–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. H., C. Chuwonganant, and T. D. McCormick. 2003. “Order Preferencing and Market Quality on NASDAQ Before and After Decimalization.”Journal of Financial Economics 71: 581–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, P. and A. Madhavan. 1997. “Competition and Collusion in Dealer Markets.”Journal of Finance 52: 245–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., N. M. Kiefer, and M. O’Hara. 1996. “Cream-Skimming or Profit-Sharing? The Curious Role of Purchased Order Flow.”Journal of Finance 51: 811–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., N. M. Kiefer, M. O’Hara, and J. B. Paperman. 1996. “Liquidity, Information, and Infrequently Traded Stocks.”Journal of Finance 51: 1405–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, F. and S. Viswanathan. 1990. “A Theory of Intraday Variations in Volume, Variance, and Trading Costs in Securities Markets.”Review of Financial Studies 3: 593–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbade, K. and W. Silber. 1979. “Structural Organization of Secondary Markets: Clearing Frequency, Dealer Activity and Liquidity Risk.”Journal of Finance 34: 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godek, P. 1996. “Why NASDAQ Market Makers Avoid Odd-Eighth Quotes?”Journal of Financial Economics 41: 465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. A., A. V. Shkilko, B. F. Van Ness, and R. A. Van Ness. 2007. “Competition in the Market for NASDAQ-Listed Securities.”Journal of Financial Markets forthcoming.

  • Gorton, G. B. and G. G. Pennacchi. 1993. “Security Baskets and Index-Linked Securities.”Journal of Business 66: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J. and G. Saar. 2002. “Limit Orders and Volatility in a Hybrid Market: The Island ECN.”Working paper, NYU.

  • Hegde, S. P. and J. B. McDermott. 2004. “The Market Liquidity of Diamonds, Q’s, and Their Underlying Stocks.”Journal of Banking and Finance 28: 1043–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, T. and C. M. Jones. 2005. “Island Goes Dark: Transparency, Fragmentation, and Regulation.”Review of Financial Studies 18: 743–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R. D. and H. Stoll. 1996. “Dealer Versus Auction Markets: A Paired Comparison of Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE.”Journal of Financial Economics 41: 313–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D. and A. Madhavan. 1996. “The Upstairs Market for Large-Block Transactions: Analysis and Measurement of Price Effects.”Review of Financial Studies 9: 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. and M. Ready. 1991. “Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data.”Journal of Finance 46: 733–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. M. C. 1993. “Market Integration and Price Execution for NYSE-Listed Securities.”Journal of Finance 48: 1009–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, M. L. 2003. “Competition Among Market Centers.” AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings.

  • Madhavan, A. and M. Cheng. 1997. “In Search of Liquidity: An Analysis of Upstairs and Downstairs Trades.”Review of Financial Studies 10: 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, H. 1987. “Consolidation, Fragmentation, and Market Performance.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22: 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, M. 1989. “Trading Volume and Asset Liquidity.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, A. 1991. “A Theory of Trading in Stock Index Futures.”Review of Financial Studies 4: 17–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, J. P. 2000. “Competition on the Nasdaq and the Impact of Recent Market Reforms.”Journal of Finance 55: 2565–2598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, V., Van Ness, B.F. & Van Ness, R.R. Inter-market competition for exchange traded funds. J Econ Finan 31, 251–267 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751646

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751646

Keywords

Navigation