Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of geographical isolation on genetic diversity ofHimantoglossum hircinum (Orchidaceae)

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many plants live in habitats that are becoming increasingly rare and fragmented due to human disturbance. Studies of genetic diversity are necessary for understanding and evaluating the impact of habitat fragmentation, and land-use change on the dynamics of rare species to help in setting priorities for their management. We used AFLP markers to study variation in genetic structure within and among three border populations of the orchidHimantoglossum hircinum. Study sites were located in central Germany, which represents the north-eastern border of distribution, and they were separated from each other by a maximum distance of 10 km. Landscape between the populations was characterized by man-made habitat features including agricultural fields, major roads and settlements. We compared pairs of populations to evaluate genetic variation, genetic differentiation, and the current level of gene flow between them. Genetic diversity was high within the populations and higher within than between the populations. Population genetic differentiation was relatively high compared to other orchid species (G st=0.20). Gene flow between pairs of the populations varied and appeared to be influenced by landscape characteristics separating the localities. Recommendations for conservation ofH. hircinum are provided. Management activities should concentrate on maintenance or enlargement of habitat size to prevent loss of genetic diversity due to genetic drift. Sites are genetically relatively isolated, but using stepping stones to improve gene exchange would be problematic because of the intense land-use in the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandersson R. &Ågren J. (2000): Genetic structure in the nonrewarding bumblebee-pollinated orchidCalypso bulbosa.Heredity 85: 401–409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Buylla E.R., Garcia-Barrios R. &Lara-Moreno C. (1996): Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: Applications and perspectives for tropical rainforest tree species.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 387–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditti J. &Ghani A.K.A. (2000): Tansley Review No. 110. Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications.New Phytol. 145: 367–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arduino P., Verra F., Cianchi R., Rossi W., Corrias B. &Bullini L. (1996): Genetic variation and natural hybridization betweenOrchis laxiflora andOrchis palustris (Orchidaceae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 202: 87–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avise J.C. &Hamrick J.L. (1996):Conservation genetics — case studies from nature. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey P.D. (1998): Modelling the spread ofHimantoglossum hircinum (L.)Spreng. at a site in the south of England.Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 126: 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey P.D. (1999): Changes in the distribution and abundance ofHimantoglossum hircinum (L.)Sprengel (Orchidaceae) over the last 100 years.Watsonia 22: 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey P.D. &Farrell L. (2002):Himantoglossum hircinum (L.)Sprengel.J. Ecol. 90: 206–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey P.D., Farrell L. &Stewart N.F. (2002): The sudden increase in the abundance ofHimantoglossum hircinum in England in the past decade and what has caused it. In:Kindlmann P., Willems J.H. &Whigham D. (eds.),Trends and fluctuations and underlying mechanisms in terrestrial orchid populations, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case M.A. (1994): Extensive variation in the levels of genetic diversity and degree of relatedness among five species ofCypripedium (Orchidaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 81: 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow J.F. &Aoki K. (1984): Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 6073–6077.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dudash M.R., Carr D.E. &Fenster C.B. (1997): Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing inMimulus guttatus: Inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level.Evolution 51: 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers B.K. &Pedersen H.E. (2000): Genetic variation in three species ofEpipactis (Orchidaceae): geographic scale and evolutionary inferences.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L., Smouse P.E. &Quattro J.M. (1992): Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction sites.Genetics 131: 479–491.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J. (1985): Confidence limits on phylogeneis: an approach using the bootstrap.Evolution 39: 783–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenster C.B. (1991): Gene flow inChamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae) I. Gene dispersal.Evolution 45: 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M. &Matthies D. (1998): RAPD variation in relation to population size and plant fitness in the rareGentianella germanica (Gentianaceae)Amer. J. Bot. 85: 811–819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M., Husi R. &Prati D. (2000): RAPD variation among and within small and large populations of the rare clonal plantRanunculus reptans (Ranunculaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1128–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel O.H. &Soulé M.E. (1981):Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin M. (1991): The genetic effective size of a metapopulation.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good R. (1936): On the distribution of Lizard Orchid (Himantoglossum hircinumKoch).New Phytol. 35: 142–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli N.J. (1991): Metapopulation models: the rescue effect, the propagule rain and the core satellite hypothesis.Amer. Naturalist 138: 768–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gram W.K. &Sork V.L. (2001): Association between environmental and genetic heterogeneity in forest tree populations.Ecology 82: 2012–2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick J.L. &Godt M.J.W. (1990): Allozyme diversity in the grasses. In:Cheplick G.P. (ed.),Population biology of grasses, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S. &Hastings A. (1996): Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structure.Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 180–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich W. (2000): Die Bocks-Riemenzunge (Himantoglossum hircinum) — Langzeitbeobachtungen auf markierten Dauerflächen. In:Arbeitskreis Heimische Orchideen (eds.),Heimische Orchideen. Artenmonitoring und Langzeitbeobachtung, Populationsdynamik und Artenschutz, AHO Thüringen e.V., Uhlstädt, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich W. &Voelckel H. (1999): Die Bocks-Riemenzunge [Himantoglossum hircinum (L.)Spreng.] — Orchidee des Jahres 1999.Ber. Arbeitskreis. Heimische Orchid. 16: 83–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich W., Jetschke G. &Pfeifer M. (2004): Populationsentwicklung der Bocks-Riemenzunge (Himantoglossum hircinum) — Untersuchungen auf Dauerflächen im NSG “Leutratal” bei Jena (Thüringen).Ber. Arbeitskreis. Heimische Orchid. 21: 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig F.H., Nolte M., Ochsmann J. &Wissemann V. (1999): Rapid isolation of total cell DNA from milligram plant tissue.Haussknechtia 7: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel S., Faville M.Z. &Gemmill C.E.C. (2002): Genetic variation of the endangered holoparasiteDactylanthus taylorii (Balanophoraceae) in New Zealand.J. Biogeogr. 29: 663–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooftman D.A.P., Diemer M., Lienert J. &Schmid B. (1999): Does habitat fragmentation reduce the long-term survival of isolated populations of dominant plants? A field design.Bull. Geobot. Instit. ETH 65: 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff D.R., Peakall R. &Smouse P.E. (1993): RAPD variation within and among populations of outcrossing buffalograss (Buchlöe dactyloides (Nutt.)Engelm.).Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 927–934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jedicke E. (1997):Die Roten Listen. Gefährdete Pflanzen, Tiere, Pflanzengesellschaften und Biotoptypen in Bund und Ländern. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P. (1908): Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution floral.Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44: 223–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan A., Crespo M.B., Cowan R.S., Lexer C. &Fay F. (2004): Patterns of variability and gene flow inMedicago citrina, an endangered endemic of islands in the western Mediterranean, as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP).Molec. Ecol. 13: 2679–2690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koelewijn H.P. (1998): Effects of different levels of inbreeding on progeny fitness inPlantago coronopus.Evolution 52: 692–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kölliker R., Stadelmann F.J., Reidy B. &Nösberger J. (1998): Fertilization and defoliation frequency affect genetic diversity ofFestuca pratensisHuds. in permanent grasslands.Molec. Ecol. 7: 1557–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski W.J. (1990):Principles of multivariate analysis. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger A.M., Hellwig F.H. &Oberprieler C. (2002): Genetic diversity in natural and anthropogenic inland populations of salt-tolerant plants: random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses ofAster triploidum L. (Compositae) andSalicornia ramosissimaWoods (Chenopodiaceae).Molec. Ecol. 11: 1647–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R.C (1972): The apportionment of human diversity.Evol. Biol. 6: 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim S.H., Liew C.F., Lim C.N., Lee Y.H. &Goh C.J. (1997): A simple and efficient method of DNA isolation from orchid species and hybrids.Biol. Pl. 41: 313–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart Y.B. &Grant M.C. (1996): Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 237–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meusel H., Jäger E. &Weinert E. (1965):Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalakis Y. &Excoffier L. (1996): A genetic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci.Genetics 142: 1061–1064.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller M. (1997):Tools For Population Genetic Analyses (TFPGA). Version 1.3. Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton J.B. (1997):Selection in natural populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller U.G. &Wolfenbarger L.L. (1999): AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting.Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 389–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murren C.J. (2003): Spatial and demographic population genetic structure in Catasetum viridiflavum across a human-disturbed habitat.J. Evol. Biol. 16: 333–342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murren C.J. &Ellison A.M. (1998): Seed dispersal characteristics ofBrassavola nodosa (Orchidaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 85: 675–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi M.S., Sabharwal V., Bhat R. &Lakshmikumaran M. (2004): Utility of AFLP markers for the assessment of genetic diversity withinBrassica nigra germplasm.Pl. Breeding 123: 13–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M. (1973): Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 3321–3323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M. (1978): Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.Genetics 89: 583–590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M. (1987):Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostermeijer J.G.B., van Eijck M.W., van Leeuwen N.C. &den Nijs J.C.M. (1995): Analysis of the relationship between allozyme heterozygosity and fitness in the rareGentiana pneumonanthe.J. Evol. Biol. 8: 739–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oostermeijer J.G.B., van Eijck M.W. &den Nijs J.C.M. (1994a): Offspring fitness in relation to population size and genetic variation in the rare perennial plant speciesGentiana pneumonanthe (Gentianaceae).Oecologia 97: 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostermeijer J.G.B., van’t Veer R. &den Nijs J.C.M. (1994b): Population structure of the rare, long-lived perennialGentiana pneumonanthe in relation to vegetation and management in the Netherlands.J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouborg N.J., Piquot Y. &van Groenendael M. (1999): Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants.J. Ecol. 87: 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell J.R. &Charlesworth B. (2000): Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity.Philos. Trans. Ser. B 355: 1851–1864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R. &Beattie A.J. (1996): Ecological and genetic consequences of pollination by sexual deception in the orchidCaladenia tentactulata.Evolution 50: 2207–2220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R. &Smouse P.E. (2001):GenAlEx V5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R., Smouse P.E. &Huff D.R. (1995): Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RAPD variation in diploid populations of Buffalograss (Buchlöe dactyloides (Nutt.)Engelm.).Molec. Ecol. 4: 135–147.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petit R.J., El Mousadik A. &Pons O. (1998): Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers.Conservation Biol. 12: 844–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell W., Morgante M., Andre C., Hanafey M., Vogel J., Tingey S. &Rafalski A. (1996): The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (Microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis.Molec. Breeding 2: 225–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qamaruz-Zaman F., Fay M.F., Parker J.S. &Chase M.W. (1998): The use of AFLP fingerprinting in conservation genetics: a case study ofOrchis simia (Orchidaceae).Lindleyana 13: 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M. &Rousset F. (1994): An exact test for population differentiation.Evolution 49: 1280–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson J.E., Fay M.F., Cronk Q.C.B. et al. (2003): Species delimiation and the origin of populations in island representatives ofPhylica (Rhamnaceae).Evolution 57: 816–827.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf F.J. (1998):NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 2.0. Applied Biostatistics, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scacchi R., De Angelis G. &Lanzara P. (1990): Allozyme variation among and within elevenOrchis species (Fam.Orchidaceae), with special reference to hybridizing aptitude.Genetica 81: 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scacchi R., De Angelis G. &Corbo R.M. (1991): Effect of the breeding system on the genetic structure in threeCephalanthera spp. (Orchideceae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 176: 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal B.A. (1975): Population structure and local differentiation inLiatris cylindracea.Amer. Naturalist 109: 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S., Roessli D. &Excoffier L. (2000):ARLEQUIN, version 2.000. A Software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C.E. &Weaver W. (1949):The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. &Abele L.G. (1982): Refuge design and island biogeographic theory: effects of fragmentation.Amer. Naturalist 120: 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M. (1987): Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural-populations.Science 236: 787–792.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M. &Barton N.H. (1989): A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow.Evolution 43: 1349–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath P.H. &Sokal R.R. (1973):Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenström A., Jonsson B.O., Jonsdottir I.S., Fagerströms T. &Augner M. (2001): Genetic variation and clonal diversity in four clonal sedges (Carex) along the Arctic coast of Eurasia.Molec. Ecol. 10: 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun M. (1996): Effects of population size, mating system and evolutionary origin on genetic diversity inSpirantes sinensis andS. hongkongensis.Conservation Biol. 10: 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syamsuardi &Okada H. (2002): Genetic diversity and genetic structure of populations ofRanunculus japonicusThunb. (Ranunculaceae).Pl. Spec. Biol. 17: 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J. (1999): Population differentiation in Mediterranean plants: insights into colonization history and the evolution and conservation of endemic species.Heredity 82: 229–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Travis S.E., Machinski J. &Keim P. (1996): An analysis of genetic variation inAstragalus cremnophylax var.cremnophylax, a critically endangered plant, using AFLP markers.Molec. Ecol. 5: 735–745.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay R.L., Ackerman J.D., Zimmerman J.K. &Calvo R.N. (2005): Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84: 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., van de Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Peleman J., Kuiper M. &Zabeau M. (1995): AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.Nucl. Acids Res. 23: 4407–4414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waser N.M. (1987): Spatial genetic heterogeneity in a population of the montane perennial herbDelphinium nelsonii.Heredity 58: 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock M.C. &McCauley D.E. (1999): Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups.Evolution 44: 1717–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis N. (1990):Lizard Orchid (Himantoglossum hircinum)wardening at Royal St. Georges Golf Course, Sandwich Bay, Kent. Kent Trust for Nature Conservation report, Kent Wildlife Trust, Maidstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield M.O., Arnold G.M., Cooper F., Le Ray M., White J., Karp A. &Edwards K.J. (1998): A study of the genetic diversity inPopulus nigra subsp.betulifolia in the Upper Severn area of the UK using AFLP markers.Molec. Ecol. 7: 3–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S. (1951): The genetical structure of populations.Ann. Eugenics 15: 323–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S. (1978):Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh F.C., Yang R. &Boyle T. (1999):Popgene Version 1.31. Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A.G., Brown A.H.D. &Zich F.A. (1999): Genetic structure of fragmented populations of the endangered daisyRutidosis leptorrhynchoides.Conservation Biol. 13: 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Pfeifer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfeifer, M., Jetschke, G. Influence of geographical isolation on genetic diversity ofHimantoglossum hircinum (Orchidaceae). Folia Geobot 41, 3–20 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02805258

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02805258

Keywords

Navigation