Abstract
Life Cycle Assessment is becoming an important tool for guiding environmental design improvements in the automotive industry. This paper reports the life cycle inventory profiles for two fuel tank systems based on a collaborative effort between the National Pollution Prevention Center at the University of Michigan, General Motors Research and Development, and the National Risk Management Research Laboratory of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Two 31 gallon functionally equivalent fuel tank systems used on a 1996 light duty vehicle were investigated: a multi-layer HDPE tank with a steel shield and PVC coated steel straps, and a steel tank with a HDPE shield and painted steel straps. Overall, the HDPE fuel tank system is environmentally preferable to the steel tank system based on the set of inventory results presented in this investigation. The Life Cycle Inventory analysis indicated lower energy burdens for the HDPE tank system and comparable solid waste burdens for both systems. The total life cycle energy consumption for the steel and HDPE tank systems were 4.9 GJ and 3.6 GJ per tank, respectively. The energy consumption and most of the air pollutants inventoried occurred as a consequence of the use phase. The solid wastes were generated primatily during the material production phase for the steel tank (13 kg) and during the end-of-life management phase for the HDPE tank (14 kg). This study also highlights data analysis and modeling challenges, including manufacturing and use phase allocation methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Plastics Council: Economics of Recovery and Recycling, 1994
Barlow, A.;Contos, D.;Holdren, M.;Garrison, P.;Harris, L.;Janke, B.: Development of Emission Factors for Polyethylene Processing, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 46 (June 1996), 569–580, 1996
Boustead, I.: Eco-Profiles of the European Plastics Industry - Polyethylene and Polypropylene: Report 3: The European Centre for Plastics in the Environment, Belgium, Brussels, 1993
Boustead, I.: Eco-Profiles of the European Plastics Industry, Report 6: Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC). The European Centre for Plastics in the Environment, Belgium, Brussels, 1994
CFR. 40 CFR Part 81 Section 86.094-8, 1994
FOEFL Swiss Federal Office of Environment, Forests, and Landscape: Ecobalance of Packaging Materials State of 1990, Switzerland, Bernes, 1991
Franklin Associates: Appendix A: Energy Requirements and Environmental Emissions for Fuel Consumption, Franklin Associates, Prairie Village, KS, 1992
Fussler, C.R.;Krummenacher B.: Ecobalances: A Key to Better Environmental Material Choices in Automotive Design, Materials and Design 12 (3), 123–128 (1991)
General Motors, Corporate Data, 1996
International Iron and Steel Institute: Competition Between Steel and Aluminum for the Passenger Car , Belgium, Brussels, 1994
Kar, K.;Keoleian G. A.: Application of life cycle design to aluminum intake manifolds, SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Ml, 26 February, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, PA, 1996
Keoleian, G.A.;Kar, K.;Manion, M.M.;Bulkley, J.W.: Industrial Ecology of the Automobile: A Life Cycle Perspective, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE): Warrendale, PA, 1997b
Keoleian, G.A.;Menerey, D.: Life Cycle Design Guidance Manual: Environmental Requirements and the Product System, US EPA, Office of Research and Development, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 1993
Keoleian, G.A.;Spatari, S.;Beal, R.T.: Life Cycle Design of Fuel Tank Systems. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 1997a
Office for the Study of Automotive Transportation: Delphi VIII: Forecast and Analysis of the North American Automotive Industry: Volume 3 Materials, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI UMTRI-96-01- 03, 1996
Ross, M.;Goodwin, R.;Watkins, R.;Wang, M.Q.;Wenzel, T.: Real-World Emissions from Model Year 1993, 2000 and 2010 Passenger Cars, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington DC, 1995
SETAC Workshop Report - A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessment, Smugglers Notch, VT, 18 August 1990, Washington, DC: Society of Environmental Toxicologists and Chemists, 1991
Sullivan, J. L.;Hu, J.: Life cycle energy analysis for automobiles, SAE Total Life Cycle Conference, Vienna, 16 October, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, PA, SAE Paper 951829, 1995
Vigon, B.W.;Tolle, D.A.;Cornary, B.W.;Latham, H.C.;Harrison, C.L.;Boucuski, T.L.;Hunt, R.G.;Sellers., J.D.: Life Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles, US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH EPA/600/R-92/245, 1993
Wood, R.: Automotive Engineering Plastics, London, Pentech, 1991
Wythe, S.: Stevens Institute of Technology, personal communication, 1996
Yamato, M.;Yoshihito M.: Life Cycle Inventory Study of Automotive Fuel Tank, Life Cycle Inventory Study of Automotive Fuel Tank, Proceedings of the 1997 Total Life Cycle Conference - Life Cycle Management and Assessment (Part 1), Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, PA, SAE Paper 971177, 1997
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keoleian, G.A., Spatari, S., Beal, R.T. et al. Application of life cycle inventory analysis to fuel tank system design. Int. J. LCA 3, 18–28 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978446
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978446