Skip to main content
Log in

Restructuring the apartheid city

Cato manor—‘A prime urban reconstruction opportunity’?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Butler-Adam, J.F. and Venter, W.M. 1984.The Present Residents of Cato Manor: Gathered Fragments of a Dispersed Community. Occasional Paper 11, ISER, University of Durban-Westville.

  • Cato Manor Development Association (CMDA). 1994. Annual Report. Durban.

  • Cato Manor Development Association (CMDA). 1995. The Cato Manor Annual Business Plan: 1994–1996.

  • Cato Manor Development Association (CMDA). 1996. Greater Cato Manor Structure Plan. Executive Summary. Second Draft.

  • Dewar, D. 1992. Urbanisation and the South African City: A Manifesto for Change. In Smith, D.M. (ed.),The Apartheid City and Beyond: Urbanisation and Social Change in South Africa. London: Routledge, London University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewar, D. and Uytenbogaardt, R.S. 1991.South African Cities: A Manifesto for Change. Urban Problems Research Unit, University of Cape Town.

  • Edwards, I. 1989. Mkhubane Our Home: African Shantytown Society in Cato Manor Farm, 1946–1960. Doctoral thesis, University of Natal, Durban.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. Cato Manor: Cruel past, pivotal future.Review of African Political Economy 61:415–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigaba, M. and Maharaj, B. 1996. Land invasions during political transition: The Wiggins saga in Cato Manor.Development Southern Africa 13:217–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. and Gugler, J. 1992.Cities, Poverty and Development (2 edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindson, D. and Byerley, M. 1993. Class, Race and Settlement in Cato Manor: Report on surveys of African and Indian Households in Cato Manor. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Durban-Westville.

  • Hindson, D., Gwagwa, L. and Makhathini, M. 1994. Land and Homes Invasion: A suggested approach for the CMDA. Report presented to the CMDA.

  • Hindson, D., Mabin, A. and Watson, T. 1992. Restructuring the Built Environment: Phase One Report. Report to Working Group 5. National Housing Forum.

  • Hindson, D. and Makhatini, M. 1993.Community Dynamics and Leadership in Cato Manor. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Durban-Westville.

  • Izwi. Cato Manor Community Newspaper, published by the CMDA.

  • Lawson, L. 1991. People, Politics and the Environment in South Africa. In Cock, J. and Kock, E. (eds),Going Green. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livion, T. 1996. Cato Manor: Sediments of South African Politics. In Human Settlement and Physical Planning in Durban, South Africa. Report from a study made by a Swedish student group, October 1995, Stockholm.

  • Lundberg, A. and Weise, M. 1996. The Cato Manor Development Association. In Human Settlement Physical Planning in Durban, South Africa. Report from a study made by a Swedish student group, October 1995, Stockholm.

  • Maharaj, B. 1994. The Group Areas Act and community destruction in South Africa: The struggle for Cato Manor in Durban.Urban Forum 5(2):1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maharaj, B. 1996. Politics, Community Displacement and Planning: Cato Manor—Past, Present and Future. Paper presented at the Seminar, Understanding Changing Patterns of Settlement and Resettlement in Southern Africa. Rhodes University, 22–26 Jan. 1996.

  • — 1997. Apartheid, urban segregation and the local state: Durban and the Group Areas Act in South Africa.Urban Geography 18:135–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maharaj, B. and Ramballi, K. 1997. Urban Land Claims — Contested Terrain: The Case of Cato Manor. Paper presented at the CONSAS Conference on Land Surveying and Land Tenure, Durban, Aug. 1997.

  • — 1998. Local economic development strategies in an emerging democracy: The case of Durban in South Africa.Urban Studies 35:131–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makhathini, M. and Xaba, T. 1995. A Report on the Socio-economic Survey of the Informal Area of Cato Crest in Cato Manor. Institute for Socioeconomic Research, University of Durban-Westville.

  • Rabenau, B. 1995. Appraisal Report: Cato Manor Development Programme, Durban, South Africa. European Union, Brussels, 12 July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramballi, K. 1998. Land Restitution in Cato Manor. Master’s dissertation, University of Durban-Westville.

  • Robinson, P.S. 1992. A Policy Framework for Greater Cato Manor. Prepared for the Greater Cato Manor Development Forum.

  • Robinson, P.S. 1994. Cato Manor: A Legacy of South Africa’s Past or a Model for Reconstruction? Paper presented to the Sixth International Planning History Conference at the University of Hong Kong, 21–24 June.

  • Robinson, P. and Smit, D. 1994. Some Early Lessons from Cato Manor Development: Growth Management for Cities in Crisis. Paper presented at the 1994 International Conference of the South African Institute of Town and Regional Planners, University of Cape Town, 8–9 Sept. 1994.

  • Seneque, S. and Brown, M. 1994. Preliminary Report on Corridors and Nodes in Cato Manor. (Town and Regional Planning Consultants)

  • Smit, D. 1996. Delivery Systems in Cato Manor: A Comparative Analysis. Report prepared for the CMDA.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, S., Maharaj, B. Restructuring the apartheid city. Urban Forum 9, 197–223 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033050

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033050

Keywords

Navigation