Abstract
The move to a market model of schooling has seen a radical restructuring of the ways schooling is “done” in recent times in Western countries. Although there has been a great deal of work to examine the effects of a market model on local school management (LSM), teachers’ work and university systems, relatively little has been done to examine its effect on parents’ choice of school in the non-government sector in Australia. This study examines the reasons parents give for choosing a nongovernment school in the outer suburbs of one large city in Australia. Drawing on the work of Bourdieu specifically his ideas on “cultural capital” (1977), this study revealed that parents were choosing the non-government school over the government school to ensure that their children would be provided, through the school’s emphasis on cultural capital, access to a perceived “better life” thus enhancing the potential to facilitate “extraordinary children”, one of the school’s marketing claims.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourdieu, P. (1977).Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990).In other words, essays towards a reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Caldwell, B. (1999). Market, choice and public good in school education.Australian Journal of Education, 43(3), 257–272.
Campbell, C. (2005). Changing school loyalties and the middle class: A reflection on the ceveloping fate of state comprehensive high schooling.Australian Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–24.
Connell, R. (1998). Schools, market, justice, education in a fractured world. In A. Reid (Ed.),Going public, education policy and public education in Australia (pp. 88–96). Adelaide: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
Cox, E. (1998). Forward: Growing social capital. In A. Reid (Ed.),Going public, education policy and public education in Australia (pp. ix-x). Adelaide: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
Department for Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs. (2000).Answer to DETYA question number E412. Canberra: Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education Legislation Committee.
English. R. (2005). School choice in a new market context: A case study of The Shelbyville College. Unpublished masters thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved April 1, 2009 from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/16027/
Fairclough, N. (1989).Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992).Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995).Critical discourse analysis, the critical study of language. London: Longman.
Gee, J. (1996).Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
Gerwitz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995).Markets, choice, and equity in education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Harrington, M. (2004).Commonwealth funding for schools since 1996, an update. Retrieved March 16, 2004, from http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/2003-04/04rn41.htm. (Australian Parliament House).
Ingvarson, L., Kleinhenz, E., & Wilkinson, J. (2007).Research on Performance Pay for Teachers. Retreived July2, 2007, from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education /publications_resources/profiles/Research_on_performance_pay_for_teachers.htm
Kenway, J., & Bullen, E. (2001).Consuming children, education-entertainment-advertising. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
Luke, A. (1995). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis.Review of Research in Education, 21, 3–48.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1989).The postmodern condition, a report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Marginson, S. (1997).Markets in education. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Marginson, S. (1999). Introduction by guest editor: Education and the trend to market.Australian Journal of Education, 43(3), 229–240.
Marginson, S. (2004). National and global competition in higher education.Australian Educational Researcher, 31(2), 1–28.
Marginson, S. (2005). Diversity in the Nelson system.Campus Review, 15(25), 8–9.
McGregor, C. (1997).Class in Australia. Melbourne: Penguin.
Meadmore, D. (2004). How do social class and education make the great divide? In B. Burnett, D. Meadmore, & G. Tait (Eds.),New questions for contemporary teacher: Taking a socio-cultural approach to education (pp. 73–86). Sydney: Pearson.
Mills, S. (1997).Discourse: The new critical idiom. London: Routledge.
Nelson, B. (2004).Time for transparency in school performance. Press Release, Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), 30 April 2004. [Ministerial Paper MIN692/04].
O’Brien, P., & Down, B. (2002). What are teachers saying about new managerialism?Journal of Education Policy, 3(1), 111–133.
Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia: House of Representatives. (2002).States Grants (Primary and Secondary education assistance) amendment bill 2002: Explanatory memorandum. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from http://parlinfo.aph. gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/ems/r1451_ems_b859e750-49d3-4e2f-b3cb-21bc00a4a93d/upload_pdf/46491.pdf;fileType=application/pdf#search=%22explanatory %20Memorandum%20States%20Grants%202002%22
Press, F., & Woodrow, C. (2005). Commodification, corporatisation and children’s spaces.Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 278–291
Vincent, C. (2001). Social class and parental agency.Journal of Education Policy, 16(4), 347–364.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
English, R. Selling education through “culture”: responses to the market by new, non-government schools. Aust. Educ. Res. 36, 89–104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216894
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216894