Skip to main content
Log in

Negative effects of positive reinforcement

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Procedures classified as positive reinforcement are generally regarded as more desirable than those classified as aversive—those that involve negative reinforcement or punishment. This is a crude test of the desirability of a procedure to change or maintain behavior. The problems can be identified on the basis of theory, experimental analysis, and consideration of practical cases. Theoretically, the distinction between positive and negative reinforcement has proven difficult (some would say the distinction is untenable). When the distinction is made purely in operational terms, experiments reveal that positive reinforcement has aversive functions. On a practical level, positive reinforcement can lead to deleterious effects, and it is implicated in a range of personal and societal problems. These issues challenge us to identify other criteria for judging behavioral procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azrin, N. H. (1961). Time out from positive reinforcement. Science, 8133, 382–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A. (1991). Avoidance and punishment. In I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior (Part 1, pp. 173–217). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, W. M. (1974). Chained concurrent schedules: Reinforcement as situation transition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 91–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. S., & Campagnoni, F. R. (1989). The nature and determinants of spatial retreat in the pigeon between periodic grain presentations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosbie, J. (1998). Negative reinforcement and punishment. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 163–189). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza, D. D., de Moraes, A. B. A., & Todorov, J. C. (1984). Shock intensity and signaled avoidance responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, J. A. (1983). Observing and conditioned reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 693–728. (Includes commentary)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantino, E. (1977). Choice and conditioned reinforcement. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 313–339). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B. (1967). Arbitrary and natural reinforcement. The Psychological Record, 17, 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hineline, P. N. (1984). Aversive control: A separate domain? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 495–509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jwaideh, A. R., & Mulvaney, D. E. (1976). Punishment of observing by a stimulus associated with the lower of two reinforcement frequencies. Learning and Motivation, 7, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1975). Positive and negative reinforcement, a distinction that is no longer necessary; or a better way to talk about bad things. Behaviorism, 3, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1993). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis. Kalamazoo, MI: Association for Behavior Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W. H., & Kelleher, R. T. (1977). Determinants of reinforcement and punishment. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 174–200). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M., & Courtney, K. (1992). Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 33–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1987). Variable-interval schedules of timeout from avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 97–113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scripture, E. W. (1895). Thinking, feeling, doing. Meadville, PA: Flood and Vincent.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1989). Coercion and its fallout. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizemore, O. J., & Maxwell, F. R. (1985). Selective punishment of interresponse times: The roles of shock intensity and scheduling. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 355–366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. M. (1965). Time-out from fixed-ratio reinforcement: A systematic replication. Psychonomic Science, 2, 109–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Perone.

Additional information

This paper is based on the presidential address delivered to the Association for Behavior Analysis convention in Toronto, Ontario, May 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perone, M. Negative effects of positive reinforcement. BEHAV ANALYST 26, 1–14 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392064

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392064

Key words

Navigation