Abstract
A general framework for the reduction of the equations defining classes of spherical varieties to (possibly infinite-dimensional) grassmannians is proposed. This is applied to model varieties of types A, B and C; in particular, a standard monomial theory for these varieties is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
И. H. Бepнштeйн, И. M. Гeльфанд, C. И. Гeльфанд, Moдeлu пpeдcmaвлeнuй гpуnn Лu, Тpyды сeм. И. Г. Пeтpoвcкoгo, вып. 2 (1976), 3–21. Engl. transl.: I. N. Bernstein, I. M. Gelfand, S. I. Gelfand, S.I. Models of representations of Lie groups, Sel. Math. Sov. 1 (1981), 121–142.
N. Bourbaki, Groupes et Algèbres de Lie, Chap. 4–6, Hermann, Paris, 1968; Masson, Paris, 1981. Russian transl.: H. Бypбaки, Гpynnы u aлгeбpы Лu, Mиp, M., 1972.
P. Bravi, S. Cupit-Foutou, Classification of strict wonderful varieties, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 60(2) (2010), 641–681.
P. Bravi, J. Gandini, A. Maffei, Projective normality of model varieties and related results, arXiv:1304.6352.
R. Chirivì, LS algebras and Schubert varieties, Publications of the Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 2007.
R. Chirivì, LS algebras and application to Schubert varieties, Transform. Groups 5 (2000), no. 3, 245–264.
R. Chirivì, P. Littelmann, A. Maffei, Equations defining symmetric varieties and affine Grassmannians, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2 (2009), 291–347.
R. Chirivì, A. Maffei, Projective normality of symmetric varieties, Duke Math. Journal 122 (2004), no. 1, 93–123.
C. DeConcini, D. Eisenbud, C. Procesi, Young diagrams and determinantal varieties, Invent. math. 56 (1980), 129–165.
D. Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra. With a View Toward Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 150, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.
И. M. Гeльфaнд, A. B. Зeлeвинcкий, Moдeлu npeдcmaвлeнuй клaccuчecкux гpynn u ux cкpыmыe cuммempuu, Фyнкц. aнaлиз и eгo пpил. 18 (1984), no. 3, 14–31. Engl. transl.: I. M. Gel’fand, A. V. Zelevinskiĭ, Models of representations of classical groups and their hidden symmetries, Funct. Analysis Appl. 18 (1984), no. 3, 183–198.
I. M. Gel’fand, A. V. Zelevinsky, Representation models for classical groups and their higher symmetries, in: The Mathematical Heritage of Élie Cartan (Lyon, 1984), Astérisque 1985, Numero Hors Serie, pp. 117–128.
W. V. D. Hodge, Some enumerative results in the theory of forms, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. (39) (1943), 22–30.
S. Kumar, Kac–Moody Groups, their Flag Varieties and Representation Theory, Progress in Mathematics, Vol. 204, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2002.
V. Lakshmibai, C. Musili, C.S. Seshadri, Geometry of G/P, Bull. of the AMS 1 (1979), no. 2, 432–435.
P. Littelmann, Contracting modules and standard monomial theory for symmetrizable Kac-Moody algebras, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 11 (1998), no. 3, 551–567.
D. Luna, La variété magnifique modèle, J. Algebra 313 (2007), no. 1, 292–319.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CHIRIVÌ, R., MAFFEI, A. PLÜCKER RELATIONS AND SPHERICAL VARIETIES: APPLICATION TO MODEL VARIETIES. Transformation Groups 19, 979–997 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-014-9285-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-014-9285-6