Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Distal femoral replacement for selective periprosthetic fractures above a total knee arthroplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aim

The management of distal femur periprosthetic fractures in the elderly remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of distal segmental femur replacement as an alternative to fixation in complex distal femoral periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients.

Methods

Twelve patients were included in this prospective study, with a mean age of 78 years (range 68–90 years); incidentally, all were female. Fractures of the distal femur were classified as per Kim et al.’s classification (Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:167–175, 2006); our series included eight patients with type III and four patients with type II periprosthetic fractures. All 12 patients were treated with segmental distal femur replacement (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA). Nine patients required 90 cm and three patients required 130 cm of distal femur segment with a rotating hinge knee prosthesis.

Results

The mean follow up period was 20 months (range 15–28 months), with no major surgical complications reported. The mean duration of hospital stay following surgery was 12 days (range 7–36 days). All patients were mobilising full weight-bearing by day 3. All patients returned to their prior living arrangements. Ten patients returned to their original domicile, with one patient being discharged to a care home requiring minimal ambulatory assistance. The remaining two patients returned to their care homes.

Conclusions

WOMAC scores improved from the pre-injury state with a mean of 49.62 to 72.54 post-surgery (p-value of 0.0001). The Knee Society scores, possible only following surgery, had a mean value of 72. The mean VAS pain score was 1.75 (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain ever felt). The average range of knee flexion was from 4° to 89° (range −5° to 110°). The mean SF-36 physical functioning score was 45.64 [range 40.70–48.90; standard deviation (SD) −2.62] and the mean SF-36 mental functioning score was 52.94 (range 45.8–57.70; SD −3.38).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merkel KD, Johnson EW Jr. Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:29–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shawen SB, Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Topoleski LDT, Xenos JS, Orchowski JR. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:115–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirsh DM, Bhalla S, Roffman M. Supracondylar fracture of the femur following total knee replacement. Report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:162–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sisto DJ, Lachiewicz PF, Insall JN. Treatment of supracondylar fractures following prosthetic arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;196:265–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herrera DA, Kregor PJ, Cole PA, Levy BA, Jönsson A, Zlowodzki M. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: systematic review of 415 cases (1981–2006). Acta Orthop. 2008;79(1):22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Culp RW, Schmidt RG, Hanks G, Mak A, Esterhai JL Jr, Heppenstall RB. Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;222:212–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rand JA. Supracondylar fracture of the femur associated with polyethylene wear after total knee arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1389–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30:265–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cain PR, Rubash HE, Wissinger HA, McClain EJ. Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;208:205–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stover M. Distal femoral fractures: current treatment, results and problems. Injury. 2001;32(Suppl 3):SC3–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dennis DA. Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(1):120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moran MC, Brick GW, Sledge CB, Dysart SH, Chien EP. Supracondylar femoral fracture following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:196–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW. Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30(2):209–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:453–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(2):88–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Short WH, Hootnick DR, Murray DG. Ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;158:111–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hernigou P, Poignard A, Manicom O, Chabane-Sari MA. Treatment of fractures of the distal femur on total knee arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006;92(2):148–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Healy WL, Siliski JM, Incavo SJ. Operative treatment of distal femoral fractures proximal to total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(1):27–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kregor PJ, Hughes JL, Cole PA. Fixation of distal femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty utilizing the less invasive stabilization system (L.I.S.S.). Injury. 2001;32(Suppl 3):SC64–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Large TM, Kellam JF, Bosse MJ, Sims SH, Althausen P, Masonis JL. Locked plating of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(6 Suppl 1):115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Koenig SJ, Tornetta P 3rd. Outcome of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty. Injury. 2012;43(7):1084–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rorabeck CH, Angliss RD, Lewis PL. Fractures of the femur, tibia, and patella after total knee arthroplasty: decision making and principles of management. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:449–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Ali MS. Displaced fractures of the distal femur in elderly patients. Operative versus non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:110–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dunlop DG, Brenkel IJ. The supracondylar intramedullary nail in elderly patients with distal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30:475–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Siliski JM, Mahring M, Hofer HP. Supracondylar–intercondylar fractures of the femur. Treatment by internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:95–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McLaren AC, Dupont JA, Schroeber DC. Open reduction internal fixation of supracondylar fractures above total knee arthroplasties using the intramedullary supracondylar rod. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;302:194–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Norrish AR, Jibri ZA, Hopgood P. The LISS plate treatment of supracondylar fractures above a total knee replacement: a case–control study. Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75(5):642–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ebraheim NA, Liu J, Hashmi SZ, Sochacki KR, Moral MZ, Hirschfeld AG. High complication rate in locking plate fixation of lower periprosthetic distal femur fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(5):809–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hou Z, Bowen TR, Irgit K, Strohecker K, Matzko ME, Widmaier J, Smith WR. Locked plating of periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Windisch C, Marx F, Koller H, Kolb K. Fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty with the less invasive stabilization system: a midterm follow-up study. J Trauma. 2010;69(3):670–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Platzer P, Schuster R, Aldrian S, Prosquill S, Krumboeck A, Zehetgruber I, Kovar F, Schwameis K, Vécsei V. Management and outcome of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Trauma. 2010;68(6):1464–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mortazavi SM, Kurd MF, Bender B, Post Z, Parvizi J, Purtill JJ. Distal femoral arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(5):775–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Srinivasan K, Macdonald DA, Tzioupis CC, Giannoudis PV. Role of long stem revision knee prosthesis in periprosthetic and complex distal femoral fractures: a review of eight patients. Injury. 2005;36(9):1094–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr. Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:485–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Appleton P, Moran M, Houshian S, Robinson CM. Distal femoral fractures treated by hinged total knee replacement in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(8):1065–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None reported by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, St. Richards Hospital, Chichester, UK

    B. Rao, T. Kamal, J. Vafe & M. Moss

  2. Orthopaedic Department, Kasr El Eini Hospital, Cairo, Egypt

    T. Kamal

Authors
  1. B. Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Kamal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Vafe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Moss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Kamal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, B., Kamal, T., Vafe, J. et al. Distal femoral replacement for selective periprosthetic fractures above a total knee arthroplasty. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40, 191–199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0347-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0347-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation