Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natürliche Familienplanung

Sensiplan® – eine moderne, verlässliche Methode

Natural family planning

Sensiplan® – a modern and reliable method

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Gynäkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Durch Weiter- und Neuentwicklungen ist das Feld der natürlichen Methoden der Familienplanung unübersichtlich geworden. Unter den klassischen Methodenbezeichnungen – Temperaturmethode, Billings-Methode, symptothermale Methode – verbergen sich zahlreiche Varianten, die sich hinsichtlich Sicherheit, Praktikabilität und Akzeptanz erheblich unterscheiden. Sensiplan® (www.sensiplan.eu) ist der neue Name für die evidenzbasierte symptothermale Methode der deutschen Arbeitsgruppe NFP. Die hohe Zuverlässigkeit ist nachgewiesen. Mit relativ wenig Aufwand können Frauen das fertile Fenster im Zyklus selbstständig bestimmen und dies zur Familienplanung sowie zum differenzierten Zyklusmonitoring nutzen.

Abstract

Due to new and further developments, the field of natural family planning methods has become confusing. The conventional nomenclature—the temperature method, the Billings method, the symptothermal method—includes numerous variations of natural methods that vary substantially in efficacy, practicability, and acceptability. The new name of the evidence-based symptothermal method of the German working group NFP (Natural Family Planning) is sensiplan® (www.sensiplan.eu), which has a proven high efficacy rate. Women can reliably and independently determine the fertile window of their individual cycle without much effort. Thus, this method can be used for family planning and differentiated monitoring of a woman’s cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Arbeitsgruppe NFP (2009) Natürlich und sicher. Ein Leitfaden. TRIAS, Stuttgart

  2. Arbeitsgruppe NFP (2009) Natürlich und sicher. Arbeitsheft. TRIAS, Stuttgart

  3. Arévalo, Jennings V, Sinai I (2002) Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the standard days method. Contraception 65:333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arevalo M, Jennings V, Nikula M, Sinai I (2004) Efficacy of the new two day method of family planning. Fertil Steril 82:885–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehring R, Schneider M, Barron ML, Raviele K (2009) Cohort comparison of two fertility awareness methods of family planning. J Reprod Med 54:165–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frank-Herrmann P, Gnoth C, Baur S et al (2005) Determination of the fertile window: Reproductive competence of women – European cycle databases. Gynecol Endocrinol 20(6):305–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frank-Herrmann P, Heil J, Gnoth C et al (2007) The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple’s sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study. Hum Reprod 22(5):1310–1319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank-Herrmann P, Sottong U, Freundl G, Strowitzki T (2010) Natürliche Familienplanung. Gynäkologe 43(4):341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freundl G, Sivin I, Batar I (2009) State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: IV. Natural family planning. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 15(2):113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freundl G, Frank-Herrmann P, Gnoth CH (2010) Cycle monitors and devices in natural family planning. In S. 90–96

  11. Freundl G, Freundl-Schütt T (2006) Fertilitätscomputer und ihre Wertigkeit. Gynäkologe 39:678–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gnoth C, Frank-Herrmann P, Bremme M et al (1996) Wie korrelieren selbstbeobachtete Zyklussymptome mit der Ovulation? Zentralbl Gynakol 118(12):650–654

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E et al (2003) Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod 18(9):1959–1966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heil J (2005) Diskussion von Effektivitätsstudien verschiedener Methoden der Natürlichen Familienplanung im Hinblick auf deren Gebrauch als Kontrazeptionsmethode sowie Analyse einer prospektiven Langzeit-Kohortenstudie zur symptothermalen Methode der Natürlichen Familienplanung. Med Dissertation, Heidelberg

  15. Jacobs C, Frank-Herrmann P, Jenetzky E, Strowitzki T (2006) Self-observation of the fertile window in the menstrual cycle by the infertility patient: diagnostic relevance and spontaneous pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 21 (Suppl 1)

  16. Rabe T (2010) Contraception – update and trends. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 7

  17. Raith E, Frank P, Freundl G, Strowitzki T (2008) Natürliche Familienplanung heute. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio

  18. Rice FJ, Lanctot CA, Garcia Devesa C (1981) The effectiveness of the symptothermal method of natural family planning: An international study. Int J Fertil 26:222–230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups (1993) Prospective European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989–1992): interim results. Adv Contracept 9:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups (1999) European multicenter study of natural family planning (1989–1995): efficacy and drop-out. Adv Contracept 15:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Trussell J, Grummer-Strawn L (1990) Contraceptive failure of the ovulation method of periodic abstinence. Int Fam Plan Perspect 22:65–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Trussell J, Gummer Strawn L (1991) Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:205–245

    Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization (1981) A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. I. The teaching phase. Fertil Steril 36:152–158

    Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization (1981) A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. II. The effectiveness phase. Fertil Steril 36:591–598

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Die korrespondierende Autorin gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Fertilitätsstörungen, Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg, Voßstr. 9, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    P. Frank-Herrmann & T. Strowitzki

  2. Malteser Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention, Köln, Köln, Deutschland

    U. Sottong

  3. Sektion Natürliche Fertilität der DGGEF, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    S. Baur & G. Freundl

  4. MFM-Projekt, München, München, Deutschland

    E. Raith-Paula

Authors
  1. P. Frank-Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. U. Sottong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Baur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Raith-Paula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Strowitzki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. G. Freundl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Frank-Herrmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank-Herrmann, P., Sottong, U., Baur, S. et al. Natürliche Familienplanung. Gynäkologe 44, 17–22 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2659-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2659-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation