Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Primäre Frakturprothese und inverse Schulterprothese bei komplexer Humeruskopffraktur

Eine Alternative zur gelenkerhaltenden Osteosynthese?

Primary fracture protheses and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in complex humeral head fractures

An alternative to joint-preserving osteosynthesis?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

In den letzten Jahren hat sich bei der operativen Versorgung komplexer Humeruskopffrakturen ein dynamischer Wandel vollzogen. So hat der primäre Einsatz von inversen Schulterfrakturprothesen bei älteren Patienten erheblich an Bedeutung gewonnen. Die kurz- bis mittelfristigen Ergebnisse der inversen Frakturprothetik präsentieren sich vielversprechend, Langzeitergebnisse stehen jedoch noch aus. Hingegen hat die anatomische Frakturprothetik zugunsten der Osteosynthese und inversen Frakturprothese stark an Stellenwert verloren.

Indikationen

Dieser Übersichtsartikel beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, ob und wann eine primäre Frakturprothese zur Behandlung der komplexen Humeruskopffraktur eine Alternative zur gelenkerhaltenden Osteosynthese darstellt bzw. dieser sogar vorzuziehen ist. Des Weiteren soll auf das jeweilige Indikationsspektrum der anatomischen und inversen Frakturprothetik eingegangen werden.

Abstract

Background

The surgical management of complex humeral head fractures has adapted dynamically over the course of the last decade. The primary use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients has gained in relevance due to promising short and middle-term results. Long-term results, however, are still pending. The appliance of anatomical hemiarthroplasty, on the other hand, has lost in significance in favour of osteosynthesis and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Indications

This review article follows the question as to under which circumstances primary fracture arthroplasty reflects an alternative or even a preference to joint-preserving osteosynthesis in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. It also specifies spectrums of indications for anatomical hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Abbreviations

AO:

Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen

ASES:

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score

CRPS:

Chronisches regionales Schmerzsyndrom

DASH:

Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, Hand Score

HA:

Anatomische Frakturhemiprothese

LOE:

„Level of evidence“

MRA:

Multivariater Regressionsanalyse

OSS:

Oxford Shoulder Score

OTA:

Orthopedic Trauma Association

PE:

Polyethylen

RSA:

Inverse Frakturprothese

UCLA:

University of California Los Angeles Score

Literatur

  1. Acevedo DC, Vanbeek C, Lazarus MD et al (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: update on indications, technique, and results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:279–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anakwenze OA, Zoller S, Ahmad CS et al (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:e73–e80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastian JD, Hertel R (2008) Initial post-fracture humeral head ischemia does not predict development of necrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bastian JD, Hertel R (2009) Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:216–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgartner D, Nolan BM, Mathys R et al (2011) Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 6:36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L et al (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brorson S, Salomonsson B, Jensen SL et al (2017) Revision after shoulder replacement for acute fracture of the proximal humerus. Acta Orthop 88:446–450

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Campochiaro G, Rebuzzi M, Baudi P et al (2015) Complex proximal humerus fractures: Hertel’s criteria reliability to predict head necrosis. Musculoskelet Surg 99(Suppl 1):S9–S15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cvetanovich GL, Frank RM, Chalmers PN et al (2016) Surgical management of proximal humeral fractures: the emerging role of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics 39:e465–e473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrel JR, Trinh TQ, Fischer RA (2015) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma 29:60–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fjalestad T, Hole MO, Hovden IA et al (2012) Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma 26:98–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frombach AA, Brett K, Lapner P (2017) Humeral head replacement and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humerus fracturesm. Open Orthop J 11:1108–1114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gadea F, Favard L, Boileau P et al (2016) Fixation of 4‑part fractures of the proximal humerus: can we identify radiological criteria that support locking plates or IM nailing? Comparative, retrospective study of 107 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:963–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU et al (2007) The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21:185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta AK, Harris JD, Erickson BJ et al (2015) Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures – a systematic review of 92 studies including 4500 patients. J Orthop Trauma 29:54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Han RJ, Sing DC, Feeley BT et al (2016) Proximal humerus fragility fractures: recent trends in nonoperative and operative treatment in the Medicare population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:256–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Handoll HH, Keding A, Corbacho B et al (2017) Five-year follow-up results of the PROFHER trial comparing operative and non-operative treatment of adults with a displaced fracture of the proximal humerus. Bone Joint J 99-B:383–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardeman F, Bollars P, Donnelly M et al (2012) Predictive factors for functional outcome and failure in angular stable osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. Injury 43:153–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M et al (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:427–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jo MJ, Gardner MJ (2012) Proximal humerus fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5:192–198

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jobin CM, Galdi B, Anakwenze OA et al (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the management of proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23:190–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohan EM, Chalmers PN, Salazar D et al (2017) Dislocation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1238–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Konrad G, Audige L, Lambert S et al (2012) Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:602–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M et al (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:217–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S et al (2011) Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 42:1283–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Maier D, Jager M, Strohm PC et al (2012) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures – a review of current concepts enlightened by basic principles. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 79:307–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maier D, Jaeger M, Izadpanah K et al (2014) Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:251–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C et al (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1737–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Namdari S, Horneff JG, Baldwin K (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1701–1708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1090–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S et al (2011) Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3‑part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:747–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Osterhoff G, O’hara NN, D’cruz J et al (2017) A cost-effectiveness analysis of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for the management of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Value Health 20:404–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Park YK, Kim SH, Oh JH (2017) Intermediate-term outcome of hemiarthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:85–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM et al (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1215–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A et al (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1419–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh A, Padilla M, Nyberg EM et al (2017) Cement technique correlates with tuberosity healing in hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:437–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP et al (2009) Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1689–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sudkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P et al (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1320–1328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sun Q, Ge W, Li G et al (2017) Locking plates versus intramedullary nails in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3683-z

    Google Scholar 

  41. Visser CP, Coene LN, Brand R et al (2001) Nerve lesions in proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:421–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang G, Mao Z, Zhang L et al (2015) Meta-analysis of locking plate versus intramedullary nail for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 10:122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland

    B. Erdle, K. Izadpanah, H. Eberbach, J. Zwingmann, M. Jaeger, N. Südkamp & D. Maier

Authors
  1. B. Erdle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Izadpanah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Eberbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Zwingmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Jaeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. N. Südkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D. Maier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Erdle.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

B. Erdle, K. Izadpanah, H. Eberbach, J. Zwingmann, M. Jaeger, N. Südkamp und D. Maier geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erdle, B., Izadpanah, K., Eberbach, H. et al. Primäre Frakturprothese und inverse Schulterprothese bei komplexer Humeruskopffraktur. Orthopäde 47, 410–419 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-3570-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-3570-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation