Abstract
In 1988, facing a total fertility rate of over four births per woman, the Vietnamese government introduced a new policy that required parents to have no more than two children. Using data from the Vietnam Population and Housing Censuses from 1989, 1999, and 2009, I apply a differences-in-differences framework to assess the effects of this policy on family size, son preference, and maternal employment. I find that the policy decreased the probability that a woman has more than two children by 15 percentage points for younger women and by 7 percentage points for middle-aged women. The policy reduced the average number of living children by 0.2 births per woman. Low-education women and women in rural areas were more affected by the policy. The policy had no effects on mothers’ age at first birth and gender of mothers’ last birth. The reduction in fertility caused by the policy was associated with a 1.2 percentage point decrease in the proportion of sons in each family. The policy increased maternal employment by 1.3 percentage points. Instrumental variables estimates of the effects of fertility on maternal employment and child education suggest a negative relationship between the number of children and female labor supply and a trade-off between child quantity and child quality in Vietnam.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
These features of the policy were not equally enforced as the restriction to have no more than two children since the government did not impose punishments or fines on violating these requirements.
Priebe (2010) examines the effect of fertility on maternal employment in Indonesia and documents that less educated women and women in rural areas were more responsive to the presence of children.
Caceres-Delpiano (2012) investigates the impact of children on maternal employment in 40 developing countries and finds that the impact of children is stronger among high-educated mothers and mothers in urban areas.
Access to the Vietnam Population and Housing Census from 1979 is not publicly available. Thus, I do not use the 1979 census in this study.
Appendix Table 10 shows the fraction of mothers that still have all of their children living at home across three survey years.
The estimates of the effect of the policy on family size for subsample are shown in Appendix Figure 11.
I try different age bins (age 10–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49) rather than the quadratic in the probability of having more than two children equation and obtain very similar results.
The Vietnam Population and Housing Censuses have no information on working hours. The Censuses have information on whether an individual works for salary or not. However, more than 50% of this information are missing in the data. Thus, I could not examine the effects of the policy on these outcomes.
If the policy has an impact on educational attainment, then women with less than primary education may obtain more education and thus have at least primary education.
I show coefficients of the interactions in the mothers’ age at first birth equation in Appendix Table 18.
Coefficients of interactions in the birth spacing equation are shown in Appendix Table 19.
Coefficients of interactions in the proportion of sons in each family equation are shown in Appendix Table 20.
Coefficients of these interactions are displayed in Appendix Table 21.
References
Aaronson D, Dehejia R, Jordan A, Pop-Eleches C, Samii C, Schulze K (2017) The effect of fertility on mothers’ labor supply over the last two centuries. NBER working paper 23717. National Bureau of economic research, Cambridge, MA
Andersson G, Hank K, Ronsen M, Vikat A (2006) Gendering family composition: sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries. Demography 43(2):255–267
Angrist J, Evans WN (1998) Children and their parents’ labor supply: evidence from exogenous variation in family size. Am Econ Rev 88:450–477
Arnold F, Choe MK, Roy TK (1998) Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Pop Stud – J Demog 52:301–315
Basu D, Jong R (2010) Son targeting fertility behavior: some consequences and determinants. Demography 47(2):521–536
Becker GS, Lewis GH (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ Pt II 81(2):S279–S288
Becker GS, Tomes N (1976) Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ Pt II 84(4):S143–S162
Belanger D (2002) Son preference in a rural village in North Vietnam. Stud Fam Plan 33(4):321–334
Bélanger D, Khuat THO, Liu J, Le TT, Pham VT (2003) Are sex ratios at birth increasing in Vietnam? Population 58(2):255–276
Becquet V, Guilmoto CZ (2013) Sex selection and family patterns across Vietnam. Network Newslett 54
Brander JA, Dowrick S (1994) The role of fertility and population in economic growth. J Popul Econ 7:1–25
Caceres-Delpiano J (2012) Can we still learn something from the relationship between fertility and mother's employment? Evidence from developing countries. Demography 49(1):151–174
Chen Y, Huang Y (2018) The power of the government: China’s family planning leading group and the fertility decline since 1970. GLO Discussion Paper, No. 2014. Global labor organization (GLO), Maastricht
Chen Y, Fang H (2018) The long-term consequences of having fewer children in old age: evidence from China’s “later, longer, fewer” campaign. NBER working paper no. 25041. National Bureau of economic research, Cambridge, MA
Council of Ministers (1989) Vietnam’s new fertility policy. Popul Dev Rev 15:169–172
Clark S (2000) Son preference and sex composition of children: evidence from India. Demography 37:95–108
Cruces G, Galiani S (2007) Fertility and female labor supply in Latin America: new causal evidence. Labour Econ 14(3):565–573
Ebenstein A (2009) When is the local average treatment close to the average? Evidence from fertility and labor supply. J Hum Resour 44(4):955–975
Filmer D, Friedman J, Schady N (2009) Development, modernization, and childbearing: the role of family sex composition. World Bank Econ Rev 23(3):371–398
Greenlaugh S (1986) Shifts in China’s population policy, 1984-1986: views from the central, provincial, and local levels. Popul Dev Rev 12(3):493–515
General Statistics Office of Vietnam (GSO) (2010) The 2009 Vietnam population and housing census. Available at http://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=9813. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
Goodkind D (1995) Vietnam's one-or-two child policy in action. Popul Dev Rev 21:85–109
Gu B, Wang F (2009) An experiment of eight million people (in Chinese). Soc Sci Acad Press (China)
Guilmoto CZ, Dudwick N, Gjonca A, Rahm L (2018) How do demographic trends change? The onset of birth masculinization in Albania, Georgia, and Vietnam 1990-2005. Popul Dev Rev 44(1):37–61
Gupta DM, Zhenghua J, Bohua L, Zhenming X, Chung W, Hwa-Ok B (2003) Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. J Dev Stud 40(2):153–187
Gronau R (1973) The effect of children on the housewife's value of time. J Polit econ Pt II 81(2):S168–S199
Gronau R (1986) Home production-a survey. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) In handbook of labor economics, 1st edn. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 273–304
Haughton J, Haughton D (1998) Are simple tests of son preference useful? An evaluation using data from Vietnam. J Popul Econ 11(4):495–516
Hoa HT, Toan NV, Johansson A, Hoa VT, Hojer B, Persson LA (1996) Child spacing and two-child policy in practice in rural Vietnam: cross sectional survey. BMJ 313:1113–1116
Jayaraman A, Mishra V, Arnold F (2009) The relationship of family size and composition to fertility desires, contraceptive adoption and method choice in South Asia. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 35(1):29–38
Jayachandran S, Kuziemko I (2011) Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. Q J Econ 126:1485–1538
Jensen RT (2003) Equal treatment, unequal outcomes? Generating sex inequality through fertility behaviour. Working Paper. Mimeo, Harvard University
Larsen U, Chung W, Gupta MD (1998) Fertility and son preference in Korea. Popul Stud 52:317–325
Lee J (2008) Sibling size and investment in children’s education: an Asian instrument. J Popul Econ 21:855–875
Li H, Zhang J, Zhu Y (2005) The effect of the one-child policy on fertility in China: identification based on differences-in-differences. Working paper. Mimeo. Chinese University of Hong Kong
Li H, Yi J, Zhang J (2011) Estimating the effect of the one-child policy on the sex ratio imbalance in China: identification based on the difference-in-differences. Demography 48:1535–1557
Li H, Zhang J, Zhu Y (2008) The quantity-quality trade-off of children in a developing country: identification using Chinese twins. Demography 45(1):223–243
Li B, Zhang H (2017) Does population control lead to better child quality? Evidence from China’s one-child policy enforcement. J Comp Econ 45:246–260
Liu H (2014) The quality-quantity trade-off: evidence from the relaxation of China’s one child policy. J Popul Econ 27:565–602
Lundberg S (2005) Sons, daughters, and parental behavior. Oxford Rev Econ Pol 21(3):340–356
Miller G, Babiarz KS (2016) Family planning program effects: evidence from microdata. Popul Dev Rev 42(1):7–26
Minnesota Population Center (2017) Integrated public use microdata series, international: Version 6.5 [dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Muttreja P, Singh S (2018) Family planning in India: the way forward. Indian J Med Res 148(Suppl 1):S1–S9
Nikkei Asian Review (2017) Vietnam’s declining birthrate spells end of two-child policy. Available at http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/Policy-Politics/Vietnam-s-declining-birthrate-spells-end-of-two-child-policy. Accessed 28 Jul 2017
Park C, Chung W (2012) Sibship size, birth order, and children’s education in developing countries: evidence from Bangladesh. Hit J Econ 53(1):1–23
Priebe J (2010) Child costs and the causal effect of fertility on female labor supply: an investigation for Indonesia 1993-2008. CRC-PEG discussion paper no. 45. University of Göttingen. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10419/90537. Accessed 20 Oct 2017
Population Research Institute (1995) PRI Review 5(5): September/October. San Francisco Chronicle:1–2
Qin Y, Wang F (2017) Too early or too later: what have we learned from the 30-year two-child policy experiment in Yicheng, China? Demogr Res 37:929–956
Qin X, Zhuang C, Yang R (2017) Does the one-child policy improve children’s human capital in urban China? A regression discontinuity design. J Comp Econ 45:287–303
Rosenzweig MR, Wolpin KI (1980) Testing the quantity-quality fertility model: the use of twins as a natural experiment. Econometrica 48(1):227–240
Scornet C (2000) An example of coercive fertility reduction, as seen in the region of the Red River Delta in Vietnam. Population 2:101–134
Visaria L, Jejeebhoy S, Merrick T (1999) From family planning to reproductive health: challenges facing India. Int Fam Plan Perspect 25:S44–S49
Wang F (2016) Using new measures to reassess the fertility effects of China’s family planning policies. Working Paper. Renmin University of China
Wang F, Zhao LQ, Zhao Z (2017) China's family planning policies and their labor market consequences. J Popul Econ 30(1):31–68
Wei Y, Zhang L (2014) Re-examination of the Yicheng two-child program. China J 72:98–120
Whyte MK, Wang F, Cai Y (2015) Challenging myths about China’s one-child policy. China J 74:144–159
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Robert Kaestner, Ben Ost, Darren Lubotsky, Javaeria Qureshi, Neeraj Kaushal, and participants in presentations at the University of Illinois at Chicago, the Illinois Economics Association, the Midwest Economics Association, the Southern Economic Association, and the ASSA annual meetings for their valuable suggestions. I also thank three anonymous referees and the editors for their helpful comments. I thank Minnesota Population Center – IPUMS International – for giving me access to the data and General Statistics Office Vietnam for originally producing the data. All errors are mine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict(s) of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Alessandro Cigno
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ngo, A.P. Effects of Vietnam’s two-child policy on fertility, son preference, and female labor supply. J Popul Econ 33, 751–794 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-019-00766-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-019-00766-1