Abstract
The aim of this work is to illustrate how a space mapping technique using surrogate models together with response surfaces can be used for structural optimization of crashworthiness problems. To determine the response surfaces, several functional evaluations must be performed and each evaluation can be computationally demanding. The space mapping technique uses surrogate models, i.e. less costly models, to determine these surfaces and their associated gradients. The full model is used to correct the gradients from the surrogate model for the next iteration. Thus, the space mapping technique makes it possible to reduce the total computing time needed to find the optimal solution. First, two analytical functions and one analytical structural optimization problem are presented to exemplify the idea of space mapping and to compare the efficiency of space mapping to traditional response surface optimization. Secondly, a sub-model of a complete vehicle finite element (FE) model is used to study different objective functions in vehicle crashworthiness optimization. Finally, the space mapping technique is applied to a structural optimization problem of a large industrial FE vehicle model, consisting of 350.000 shell elements and a computing time of 100 h. In this problem the intrusion in the passenger compartment area was reduced by 32% without compromising other crashworthiness parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakr, M.H.; Bandler, J.W.; Biernacki, R.M.; Chen, S.H.; Madsen, K. 1998: A Trust Region Aggressive Space Mapping Algorithm for EM Optimization. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech46, 2412–2425
Bakr, M.H.; Bandler, J.W.; Madsen, K.; Rayas-Sánchez, J.E.; Sondergaard, J. 2000: Space Mapping Optimization of Microwave Circuits Exploiting Surrogate Models. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech48
Bakr, M.H.; Bandler, J.W.; Madsen, K.; Sondergaard, J. 2002: An introduction to the Space Mapping Technique. Optim Eng2, 369–384
Bandler, J.W.; Biernacki, R.M.; Chen, S.H.; Grobelny, R.H.; Hemmers, R.H. 1994: Space Mapping Technique for Elecromagnetic Optimization. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech42, 2536–2544
Bandler, J.W.; Biernacki, R.M.; Chen, S.H.; Hemmers, R.H.; Madsen, K. 1995: Electromagnetic Optimization Exploition Aggrasive Space Mapping. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech43, 2874–2882
Craig, K.J.; Stander, N.; Dooge, D.A.; Varadappa, S. 2002: Multidiciplinary design optimization of automotive crashwothiness and nvh using response surface methods. AIAA-2002-5507, Mistree, F. (ed.), 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optim., Atlanta, GA, USA
Etman, L.F.P.; Adriaens J.M.T.A.; van Slagmaat, M.T.P.; Schoofs, A.J.G. 1997: Crashworthiness design using Multipoint sequential linerar programming. Struct. Optim.12, 222–8
Etman, L.F.P. 1997: Optimization of multibody system using approximation concepts. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Forsberg, J. 2002: Simulation based crashwothiness design – Accuracy aspects of structural optimization using response surfaces. LIU-TEK-LIC-2002:27, Linköpings university, Linköping
Hallquist, J.O. 1998: LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corp., Livermore
Ignatovich, C.L.; Diaz, A.R. 2002: Physical surrogates in design optimization for enhanced crashworthiness, AIAA-2002-5537, Mistree, F. (ed.), 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optim. Atlanta, GA, USA
Leary, S.; Bhasker, A.; Keane, A. 2000: A Constraint Mapping Approach to the Structural Optimization of an Expensive Model using Surrogates. Conference on Surrogate Modelling and Space Mapping for Eng. Optim., Madsen, K. (ed.), Lyngby
Madsen, K.; Sondergaard, J. 2000: Space Mapping From a Mathematical Viewpoint. Conference on Surrogate Modelling and Space Mapping for Eng. Optim., Madsen, K. (ed), Lyngby
Marklund, P.-O. 1999: Optimization of a Car Body Component Subjected to Impact. LIU-TEK-LIC-1999:34, Linköpings university, Linköping
Marklund, P.-O.; Nilsson, L. 2001: Optimization of a Car Body Component Subjected to Impact. Struct Multidisc Optim21, 383–392
Myers, R.H.; Montgomery, D.C. 1995: Response Surface Methodology. New York: Wiley
Redhe, M. 2001: Simulation Based Design – Structural optimization at early design stages. LIU-TEK-LIC-2001:51, Linköpings university, Linköping
Redhe, M.; Nilsson, L. 2002a: A Method to Determine Structural Sensitivities in Vehicle Crashworthiness Design. Int J Crashworthiness7(2), 179–190
Redhe, M.; Forsberg, J.; Jansson, T.; Marklund, P.O.; Nilsson, L. 2002: Using the Response Surface Methodology and the D-Optimality Criterion in Crashworthiness Related Problems – an analysis of the surface approximation error versus the number of function evaluations. Struct Multidisc Optim24(3), 185–194
Redhe, M.; Nilsson, L. 2002c: Using Space Mapping and Surrogate Models to Optimize Vehicle Crashworthiness Design, AIAA-2002-5536, Mistree, F. (ed.), 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optim., Atlanta, GA, USA
Roux, W.J.; Stander, N.; Haftka, R.T. 1998: Response Surface Approximations for Structural Optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng42, 517–534
Schramm, U.; Thomas, H. 1998: Structural optimization in occupant safety and crash analysis. Des Optim1(4), 374–387
Schramm, U.; Thomas, H. 1999: Crashworthiness design using structural optimization. AIAA Pap, 98–4729
Schramm, U. 2001: Multi-disciplinary Optimization for NVH and crashworthiness. The First MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics (Boston, June 12–15), Bathe, K.J. (ed.), Oxford, Elsevier Science
Schramm, U. 2002: Designing with structural optimization – A practical point of view, AIAA Paper 2002-5191. Mistree, F. (ed.), 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optim., Atlanta, GA, USA
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.; Kodiyalam, S.; Yang, R.-J. 2000: Optimization of car body under constraints of noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH), and crash. AIAA Pap, 2000–1521
Stander, N.; Craig K.J.; Roux, W. 2002a: LS-OPT User’s Manual v. 2. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore
Yamazaki, K.; Han, J. 1998: Maximization of the Crushing Energy Absorption of Tubes. Struct Optim16, 37–46
Yang, R.-J.; Gu, L.; Tho, C.H.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 2001: Multidisciplinary design optimization of a full vehicle with high performance computing. AIAA Pap, 2001–1273
Yang, R.-J.; Tho, C.H.; Gu, L. 2002: Recent development in Multidisciplinary design optimization of vehicle structures, AIAA-2002-5606. Mistree, F. (ed.), 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optim., Atlanta, GA, USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Redhe, M., Nilsson, L. Optimization of the new Saab 9-3 exposed to impact load using a space mapping technique. Struct Multidisc Optim 27, 411–420 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0396-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0396-x