Abstract
Purpose
(1) Report concomitant cartilage and meniscal injury at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), (2) evaluate the risk of aseptic revision ACLR during follow-up, and (3) evaluate the risk of aseptic ipsilateral reoperation during follow-up.
Methods
Using a United States integrated healthcare system’s ACLR registry, patients who underwent primary isolated ACLR were identified (2010–2018). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision, with a secondary outcome evaluating ipsilateral aseptic reoperation. Outcomes were evaluated by time from injury to ACLR: acute (< 3 weeks), subacute (3 weeks–3 months), delayed (3–9 months), and chronic (≥ 9 months).
Results
The final sample included 270 acute (< 3 weeks), 5971 subacute (3 weeks–3 months), 5959 delayed (3–9 months), and 3595 chronic (≥ 9 months) ACLR. Medial meniscus [55.4% (1990/3595 chronic) vs 38.9% (105/270 acute)] and chondral injuries [40.0% (1437/3595 chronic) vs 24.8% (67/270 acute)] at the time of ACLR were more common in the chronic versus acute groups. The crude 6-year revision rate was 12.9% for acute ACLR, 7.0% for subacute, 5.1% for delayed, and 4.4% for chronic ACLR; reoperation rates a 6-year follow-up was 15.0% for acute ACLR, 9.6% for subacute, 6.4% for delayed, and 8.1% for chronic ACLR. After adjustment for covariates, acute and subacute ACLR had higher risks for aseptic revision (acute HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.07–2.72, p = 0.026; subacute HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01–1.55, p = 0.040) and aseptic reoperation (acute HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.43–2.91, p < 0.001; subacute HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11–1.54, p = 0.002) when compared to chronic ACLR.
Conclusions
In this cohort study, while more meniscal and chondral injuries were reported for ACLR performed ≥ 9 months after the date of injury, a lower risk of revision and reoperation was observed following chronic ACLR relative to patients undergoing surgery in acute or subacute fashions.
Level of evidence
III.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ACL:
-
Anterior cruciate ligament
- ACLR:
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- ACLRR:
-
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction registry
- ASA:
-
American Society of Anesthesiologists
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- BPTB:
-
Bone patellar tendon bone
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CIF:
-
Cumulative incidence function
- EHR:
-
Electronic health record
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- ROM:
-
Range of motion
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- US:
-
United States
References
Anderson AF, Anderson CN (2015) Correlation of meniscal and articular cartilage injuries in children and adolescents with timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:275–281
Bierke S, Abdelativ Y, Hees T, Karpinksi K, Häner M, Park H et al (2021) Risk of arthrofibrosis in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the role of timing and meniscus suture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:743–750
Brambilla L, Pulici L, Carimati G, Quaglia A, Prospero E, Bait C et al (2015) Prevalence of associated lesions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation with surgical timing and with patient age, sex, and body mass index. Am J Sports Med 43:2966–2973
Chen KH, Chiang ER, Wang HY, Ma HL (2019) Correlation of meniscal tear with timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients without initially concurrent meniscal tear. J Knee Surg 32:1128–1132
Deabate L, Previtali D, Grassi A, Filardo G, Candrian C, Delcogliano M (2020) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction within 3 weeks does not increase stiffness and complications compared with delayed reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 48:1263–1272
Eriksson K, von Essen C, Jönhagen S, Barenius B (2018) No risk of arthrofibrosis after acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2875–2882
Ferguson D, Palmer A, Khan S, Oduoza U, Atkinson H (2019) Early or delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is one superior? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29:1277–1289
Forsythe B, Lu Y, Agarwalla A, Ezuma CO, Patel BH, Nwachukwu BU et al (2021) Delaying ACL reconstruction beyond 6 months from injury impacts likelihood for clinically significant outcome improvement. Knee 33:290–297
Granan LP, Bahr R, Lie SA, Engebretsen L (2009) Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery and risk of cartilage lesions and meniscal tears: a cohort study based on the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med 37:955–961
Hagino T, Ochiai S, Senga S, Yamashita T, Wako M, Ando T et al (2015) Meniscal tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:1701–1706
Hagmeijer MH, Hevesi M, Desai VS, Sanders TL, Camp CL, Hewett TE et al (2019) Secondary meniscal tears in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury: relationship among operative management, osteoarthritis, and arthroplasty at 18-year mean follow-up. Am J Sports Med 47:1583–1590
Helito CP, Sobrado MF, Giglio PN, Bonadio MB, Pécora JR, Gobbi RG et al (2021) Surgical timing does not interfere on clinical outcomes in combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament: a comparative study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 37:1909–1917
Herbst E, Hoser C, Gföller P, Hepperger C, Abermann E, Neumayer K et al (2017) Impact of surgical timing on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:569–577
Hu B, Gao F, Li C, Zhang B, An M, Lu M et al (2020) A comparative analysis of the efficacy of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous ligament grafting at different time points. J Clin Lab Anal 34:e23543
Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD, Reinke EK, Huston LJ, Spindler KP (2015) Risk factors and predictors of subsequent ACL injury in either knee after ACL reconstruction: prospective analysis of 2488 primary ACL reconstructions from the MOON cohort. Am J Sports Med 43:1583–1590
Karikis I, Åhlén M, Sernert N, Ejerhed L, Rostgård-Christensen L, Kartus J (2018) The long-term outcome after early and late anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 34:1907–1917
Karter AJ, Ferrara A, Liu JY, Moffet HH, Ackerson LM, Selby JV (2002) Ethnic disparities in diabetic complications in an insured population. JAMA 287:2519–2527
Kay J, Memon M, Shah A, Yen YM, Samuelsson K, Peterson D et al (2018) Earlier anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with a decreased risk of medial meniscal and articular cartilage damage in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3738–3753
Koebnick C, Langer-Gould AM, Gould MK, Chao CR, Iyer RL, Smith N et al (2012) Sociodemographic characteristics of members of a large, integrated health care system: comparison with US Census Bureau data. Perm J 16:37–41
Lee YS, Lee OS, Lee SH, Hui TS (2018) Effect of the timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on clinical and stability outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 34:592–602
Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT (2013) Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med 41:2090–2098
Manandhar RR, Chandrashekhar K, Kumaraswamy V, Sahanand S, Rajan D (2018) Functional outcome of an early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in comparison to delayed: are we waiting in vain? J Clin Orthop Trauma 9:163–166
Matar HE, Platt SR, Bloch BV, James PJ, Cameron HU (2021) A systematic review of randomized controlled trials in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: standard techniques are comparable (299 trials with 25,816 patients). Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 3:e1211–e1226
Matthewson G, Kooner S, Rabbani R, Gottschalk T, Old J, Abou-Setta AM et al (2021) Does a delay in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increase the incidence of secondary pathology in the knee? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Sport Med 31:313–320
Mehl J, Otto A, Baldino JB, Achtnich A, Akoto R, Imhoff AB et al (2019) The ACL-deficient knee and the prevalence of meniscus and cartilage lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42017076897). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:819–841
Michalitsis S, Vlychou M, Malizos KN, Thriskos P, Hantes ME (2015) Meniscal and articular cartilage lesions in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee: correlation between time from injury and knee scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:232–239
Mok YR, Wong KL, Panjwani T, Chan CX, Toh SJ, Krishna L (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed within 12 months of the index injury is associated with a lower rate of medial meniscus tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:117–123
Monk AP, Davies LJ, Hopewell S, Harris K, Beard DJ, Price AJ (2016) Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:Cd011166
Paxton EW, Kiley ML, Love R, Barber TC, Funahashi TT, Inacio MC (2013) Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 39:246–252
Prentice HA, Lind M, Mouton C, Persson A, Magnusson H, Gabr A et al (2018) Patient demographic and surgical characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a description of registries from six countries. Br J Sports Med 52:716–722
Prodromidis AD, Drosatou C, Mourikis A, Sutton PM, Charalambous CP (2021) Relationship between timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and chondral injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354652110361413635465211036141
Prodromidis AD, Drosatou C, Thivaios GC, Zreik N, Charalambous CP (2021) Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and relationship with meniscal tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 49:2551–2562
Ralles S, Agel J, Obermeier M, Tompkins M (2015) Incidence of secondary intra-articular injuries with time to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:1373–1379
Rushdi I, Sharifudin S, Shukur A (2019) Arthrofibrosis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Malays Orthop J 13:34–38
Sanders TL, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, Fruth KM, Larson DR, Pareek A et al (2016) Is anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction effective in preventing secondary meniscal tears and osteoarthritis? Am J Sports Med 44:1699–1707
Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Kremers WK, Levy BA, Dahm DL et al (2016) Incidence of and factors associated with the decision to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction 1 to 10 years after injury. Am J Sports Med 44:1558–1564
Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA et al (2016) Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med 44:1502–1507
Sanders TL, Pareek A, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, Levy BA, Stuart MJ et al (2017) Long-term follow-up of isolated ACL tears treated without ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:493–500
Snaebjörnsson T, Hamrin Senorski E, Svantesson E, Westin O, Persson A, Karlsson J et al (2019) Graft fixation and timing of surgery are predictors of early anterior cruciate ligament revision: a cohort study from the Swedish and Norwegian knee ligament registries based on 18,425 patients. JB JS Open Access 4:e0037
Sommerfeldt M, Raheem A, Whittaker J, Hui C, Otto D (2018) Recurrent instability episodes and meniscal or cartilage damage after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118786507
Stone JA, Perrone GS, Nezwek TA, Cui Q, Vlad SC, Richmond JC et al (2019) Delayed ACL reconstruction in patients ≥40 years of age is associated with increased risk of medial meniscal injury at 1 year. Am J Sports Med 47:584–589
Sutherland K, Clatworthy M, Chang K, Rahardja R, Young SW (2019) Risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and frequency with which patients change surgeons. Orthop J Sports Med 7:2325967119880487
von Essen C, Eriksson K, Barenius B (2020) Acute ACL reconstruction shows superior clinical results and can be performed safely without an increased risk of developing arthrofibrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2036–2043
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the Kaiser Permanente orthopaedic surgeons who contribute to the Kaiser Permanente ACLRR as well as the Surgical Outcomes and Analysis Department staff, which coordinates registry operations.
Funding
No outside funding was obtained.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DYD, SA, MJC, HAP, and GBM contributed to overall conception and design of the study. RNC and HAP took part in data acquisition. RNC completed the statistical analysis. DYD, RNC, SA, and MJC drafted the manuscript. DYD, RNC, SA, MJC, HAP, and GBM reviewed the manuscript, contributed to revisions, gave approval of the final draft, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by Kaiser Permanente’s Institutional Review Board (#5691) prior to commencement.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, D.Y., Chang, R.N., Allahabadi, S. et al. Acute and subacute anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are associated with a higher risk of revision and reoperation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 3311–3321 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06912-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06912-9