Abstract
Purpose
The surgical treatment of femoral-acetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with acetabular retroversion (AR) is arthroscopical or by a reverse periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the results after arthroscopic treatment of FAIS in patients with and without radiographic signs of AR in a large, prospective cohort from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR). The hypothesis was there is no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups.
Methods
Data on 4914 hip arthroscopies performed during 2012–2019 were obtained from DHAR. Patients with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (Tönnis > 1), hip dysplasia (CEA < 25°), other hip pathologies or previous hip surgery were excluded. The clinical outcomes for patients with AR [defined by a positive posterior wall sign (PWS) in combination with a positive Ischial Spine Sign (ISS)] and patients without AR (no PWS, no ISS) were analyzed 1 and 2 years after surgery. The primary outcomes were the six domains of the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome score (HAGOS), while secondary outcomes were the Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), a visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and a numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain.
Results
A total of 3135 hip arthroscopies were included, of which 339 had AR, 1876 did not, and 920 presented one of the two signs (PWS and ISS). There were no statistically significant differences 1 and 2 years after surgery (n.s.) between patients with and without AR in HAGOS domain scores, HSAS, VAS, or NRS. Both groups showed improvement at both follow-ups. The two groups did not differ in relation to intraoperative findings and the procedures they have had.
Conclusion
The outcome 1 and 2 years after arthroscopic treatment of FAIS is not different for patients with and without AR.
Level of evidence
III.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
25 March 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06932-5
References
Ali M, Malviya A (2020) Complications and outcome after periacetabular osteotomy—influence of surgical approach. Hip Int 30(1):4–15
Bech N, Sierevelt I, de Waard S et al (2021) Capsular closure versus unrepaired interportal capsulotomy after hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement, results of a patient-blinded randomised controlled trial. Hip Int. https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000211005762
Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M et al (2005) Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87(7):1012–1018
Chandrasekaran S, Darwish N, Close MR et al (2017) Minimum 2-year outcomes of arthroscopic management of symptomatic hip labrum tears in patients with global acetabular overcoverage. Arthroscopy 33(8):1514–1520
Comins JD, Siersma VD, Lind M et al (2018) KNEES-ACL has superior responsiveness compared to the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2438–2446
Davila-Parrilla AD, Wylie J, O’Donnell C et al (2018) Reliability of and correlation between measurements of acetabular morphology. Orthopedics 41(5):e629–e635
Dippmann C, Albrecht-Olsen P, Boesen M et al (2020) Younger patients with hip joint pain. Ugeskr Laeger 182(2):V06180432
Direito-Santos B, França G, Nunes J et al (2018) Acetabular retroversion: diagnosis and treatment. EFFORT Open Rev 3(11):595–603
Dufouil C, Brayne C, Clayton D (2004) Analysis of longitudinal studies with death and drop-out: a case study. Stat Med 23(14):2215–2226
Duplantier N, McCulloch P, Nho S et al (2016) Hip dislocation or subluxation after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 32(7):1428–1434
Ezoe M, Naito M, Inoue T (2006) The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(2):372–379
Fabricant PD, Fields KG, Taylor SA et al (2015) The effect of femoral and acetabular version on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(7):537–543
Flores S, Chambers C, Borak KR et al (2018) Arthroscopic treatment of acetabular retroversion with acetabuloplasty and subspine decompression: a matched comparison with patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment for focal pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. Orthop J Sports Med 6(7):2325967118783741
Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M et al (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:112–120
Giori NJ, Trousdale RT (2003) Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:263–269
Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, O’Donnell J et al (2016) The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med 50(19):1169–1176
Hansen CF, Jensen J, Siersma V et al (2021) A catalogue of PROMs in sports science—quality assessment of PROM development and validation. Scand J Med Sci Sports 31(5):991–998
Hansen CF, Jensen J, Siersma V et al (2021) Are adequate PROMs used as outcomes in randomized controlled trials? An analysis of 54 trials. Scand J Med Sci Sports 31(5):972–981
Hartigan DE, Perets I, Walsh JP et al (2016) Clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy in radiographically diagnosed retroverted acetabula. Am J Sports Med 44(10):2531–2536
Hashemi SA, Dehghani J, Vosoughi AR (2017) Can the crossover sign be a reliable marker of global retroversion of the acetabulum? Skelet Radiol 46(1):17–21
Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF et al (2011) Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manag 41(6):1073–1093
Ishøi L, Thorborg K, Ørum MG et al (2021) How many patients achieve an acceptable symptom state after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome? A cross-sectional study including PASS cutoff values for the HAGOS and iHOT-33. Orthop J Sports Med 9(4):2325967121995267
Jakobsen SS, Overgaard S, Søballe K et al (2018) The interface between periacetabular osteotomy, hip arthroscopy and total hip arthroplasty in the young adult hip. EFORT Open Rev 3(7):408–417
Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Søballe K et al (2004) The relationship of hip joint space to self-reported hip pain. Osteoarthr Cartil 12(9):692–697
Jo S, Lee SH, Wang SI et al (2016) The role of arthroscopy in the dysplastic hip—a systematic review of the intra-articular findings, and the outcomes utilizing hip arthroscopic surgery. J Hip Preserv Surg 3(3):171–180
Kappe T, Kocak T, Neuerburg C et al (2011) Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion. Int Orthop 35(6):817–821
Konan S, Rayan F, Meermans G et al (2011) Validation of the classification system for acetabular chondral lesions identified at arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93(3):332–336
Li PLS, Ganz R (2003) Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:245–253
Litrenta J, Mu B, Chen AW et al (2019) Radiographic and clinical outcomes of adolescents with acetabular retroversion treated arthroscopically. J Pediatr Orthop 39(10):510–515
Litrenta J, Mu B, Ortiz-Declet V et al (2018) Should acetabular retroversion be treated arthroscopically? A systematic review of open versus arthroscopic techniques. Arthroscopy 34(3):953–966
Maldonado DR, Chen JW, Kyin C et al (2020) Hips with acetabular retroversion can be safely treated with advanced arthroscopic techniques without anteverting periacetabular osteotomy: midterm outcomes with propensity-matched control group. Am J Sports Med 48(7):1636–1646
Mygind-Klavsen B, Nielsen TG, Maagaard N et al (2016) Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: an epidemiologic and perioperative description of the first 2000 procedures. J Hip Preserv Surg 3(2):138–145
Mygind-Klavsen B, Lund B, Nielsen TG et al (2019) Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: predictors of outcome in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(10):3110–3120
Naal FD, Miozzari HH, Kelly BT et al (2013) The Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) for patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int 23(2):204–211
Novais EN, Carry PM, Kestel LA et al (2016) Factors that predict blood loss after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Orthopedics 39(6):e1147–e1153
Poulsen E, Lund B, Roos E (2020) The Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: registration completeness and patient characteristics between responders and non-responders. Clin Epidemiol 4(12):825–833
Rahr-Wagner L, Lind M (2016) The Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry. Clin Epidemiol 25(8):531–535
Sansone M, Ahldén M, Jónasson P et al (2017) Outcome after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in 289 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27(2):230–235
Siebenrock KA, Schaller C, Tannast M et al (2014) Anteverting periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic acetabular retroversion: results at 10 years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(21):1785–1792
Sierra RJ (2013) The management of acetabular retroversion with reverse periacetabular osteotomy. Instr Course Lect 62:305–313
Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis—what the radiologist should know. Am J Roentgenol 188(6):1540–1552
Thorborg K, Tijssen M, Habets B et al (2015) Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires for young to middle-aged adults with hip and groin disability: a systematic review of the clinimetric evidence. Br J Sports Med 49(12):812
Tibor LM, Sink EL (2012) Periacetabular osteotomy for hip preservation. Orthop Clin N Am 43(3):343–357
Vahedi H, Aalirezaie A, Schlitt PK et al (2019) Acetabular retroversion is a risk factor for less optimal outcome after femoroacetabular impingement surgery. J Arthroplasty 34(7):1342–1346
Acknowledgements
Torsten Grønbech Nielsen from the Department of Orthopedics, Section of Sports Traumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark for providing the data from DHAR.
Funding
This work was not supported by any external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares to have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was not needed for the present study. Handling of data from DHAR was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency under case number 1-16-02-184-18. DHAR is approved by the Danish Health Authority.
Informed consent
Formal consent was not required for this registry study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: Subheading of fig. 1 and fig. 2 have been corrected.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dippmann, C., Siersma, V., Overgaard, S. et al. Acetabular retroversion does not affect outcome in primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 3535–3543 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06918-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06918-3