Abstract
The existence and persistence of cities provide prima facie evidence of agglomeration economies, but do little to inform our understanding of the specific nature of forces that induce the concentration of economic activity, nor the spatial scale at which they occur. Though the theoretical literature on conceptualizes these forces without specific geographic scale, the empirical literature largely treats them as working mainly at the metropolitan level. We argue that agglomeration may work at different spatial scales. There is now extensive evidence that metropolitan areas are polycentric, with a significant portion of employment clustered in employment centers outside the CBD. This provides basic evidence of net agglomeration benefits at the sub-metropolitan level. We explore theories of agglomeration and consider how they may explain the presence, location, characteristics, and growth of employment centers. We illustrate the usefulness of exploring polycentricity with a case study of the Los Angeles region. Our understanding of agglomeration economies can be enriched by investigating the nature of employment centers and the forces that produce and sustain them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal A (2009) Do local governments influence employment center growth? Evidence from the Los Angeles region. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the western regional science association held at Napa Valley, California
Anas A, Richard A, Small K (1998) Urban spatial structure. J Econ Lit 36(3): 1426–1464
Anderson N, Bogart W (2001) The structure of sprawl: identifying and characterizing employment centers in polycentric metropolitan area. Am J Econ Sociol 60(1): 147–169
Berliant M, Wang P (2008) Urban growth and subcenter formation: a trolley ride from the staples center to Disneyland and the Rose Bowl. J Urban Econ 63(2): 679–693
Castells M (1989) The informational city. Blackwell, Oxford
Castells M, Hall P (1994) Technopoles of the world: the making of twenty-first century industrial complexes. Routledge, London
Chen H (1996) The simulation of a proposed non-linear dynamic urban growth model. Ann Reg Sci 30(3): 305–319
Christaller W (1966) Central places in Southern Germany. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Combes P-P, Duranton G, Gobillon L (2011) The identification of agglomeration economies. J Econ Geogr 11:253–266. Advance Access Published on 15 Dec 2010
Craig S, Ng P (2001) Using quantile smoothing splines to identify employment subcenters in a multicentric urban area. J Urban Econ 49: 100–120
De Silva D, McComb R (2011) Geographic concentration and firm survival. MPRA Paper 32906. University Library of Munich, Germany
Dekle R, Eaton J (1999) Agglomeration and land rents: evidence from the prefectures. J Urban Econ 46: 200–214
Drenan MP, Kelly HF (2011) Measuring urban agglomeration economies with office rents. J Econ Geogr 11: 481–507
Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. Am Econ Rev 91(5): 1454–1477
Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson J, Thisse J-F (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, chapter 48. North Holland, New York, pp 2063–2117
Ellison G, Glaeser E (1997) Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. J Polit Econ 105: 889–927
Florida R (2002) The creative class. Basic Books, Cambridge
Forestall R, Greene R (1997) Defining job concentrations: the Los Angeles case. Urban Geogr 18(8): 705–739
Fujita M, Ogawa H (1982) Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. Reg Sci Urban Econ 12(2): 161–196
Fujita M (1989) Urban economic theory: land use and city size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Funderburgh R, Boarnet M (2008) Agglomeration potential: the spatial scale of industry linkages in the Southern California economy. Growth Change 39(1): 24–57
Giuliano G, Small K (1999) The determinants of growth of employment subcenters. J Transp Geogr 7(3): 189–201
Giuliano G, Agarwal A, Redfearn C (2009) Metropolitan spatial trends in employment and housing: literature review. Report prepared for the TRB Committee on Land Use, VMT and Energy
Giuliano G, Redfearn C, Agarwal A, He S (2011) Network accessibility and employment centers. Urban Stud. Published online first on 2 Sept 2011
Giuliano G, Redfearn C, Agarwal A, Li C, Zhuang D (2007) Employment concentrations in Los Angeles, 1980–2000. Environ Plann A 39: 2935–2957
Giuliano G, Small K (1991) Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Reg Sci Urban Econ 21(2): 163–182
Glaeser E, Kallal H, Scheinkman J, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100: 1126–1152
Glaeser E, Kohlhase J (2004) Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs. Pap Reg Sci 83(1): 197–228
Glaeser E, Kolko J, Saiz A (2001) Consumer city. J Econ Geogr 1: 7–50
Glaeser E, Mare D (2001) Cities and skills. J Labor Econ 19(2): 316–342
Gordon P, Richardson H (1996) Beyond polycentricity: the dispersed metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970–1980. J Am Plann Assoc 62(3): 289–295
Graham S, Marvin S (1996) Telecommunications and the city: electronic spaces, urban places. Routledge, London
Henderson V, Mitra A (1996) The new urban landscape: developers and edge cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26: 613–643
Henderson J (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. J Urban Econ 53: 1–28
Henderson J, Kuncoro A, Turner M (1995) Industrial development in cities. J Polit Econ 103:1067–1085. http://www.demographia.com/db-japanmethousing.htm. Accessed on 4 Dec 2011
Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Mordern Library, New York
Kolko J (2010) Urbanization, agglomeration, and coagglomeration of service industries. In: Glaeser E (eds) Agglomeration economies. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
Kotkin J (2000) The new geography. Random House, New York
Lang R, Lefurgy J (2003) Edgeless cities: examining the noncentered metropolis. Hous Policy Debate 14(3): 427–460
Lee B (2007) Edge or edgeless cities? Urban spatial structure in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000. J Reg Sci 47(3): 479–515
McMillen D (2001) Nonparametric employment subcenter identification. J Urban Econ 50(3): 448–473
McMillen D, McDonald J (1997) A nonparametric analysis of employment density in a polycentric city. J Reg Sci 37(4): 591–612
McMillen D, Smith S (2003) The number of subcenters in large urban areas. J Urban Econ 53(3): 321–338
Puga D (2010) The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies. J Reg Sci 50(1): 203–219
Redfearn C (2007) The topography of metropolitan employment: identifying centers of employment in a polycentric urban area. J Urban Econ 61(3): 519–541
Romer P (1986) Increasing returns and long run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5): 1002–1037
Rosenthal S, Strange W (2001) The determinants of agglomeration. J Urban Econ 50: 191–229
Rosenthal S, Strange W (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85(2): 377–393
Rosenthal S, Strange W (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson J, Thisse J-F (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. North Holland, New York, pp 2119–2171
Small K, Song S (1994) Population and employment densities: structure and change. J Urban Econ 36: 292–313
Storper M, Manville M (2006) Behavior, preferences and cities: urban theory and urban resurgence. Urban Stud 43(8): 1247–1274
Sullivan A (1986) A general equilibrium model with agglomerative economies and decentralized employment. J Urban Econ 20: 55–74
Wheaton WC, Lewis MJ (2002) Urban wages and labor market agglomeration. J Urban Econ 51: 542–562
Zhang Y, Sasaki K (1997) Effects of subcenter formation on urban spatial structure. Reg Sci Urban Econ 27(3): 297–324
Zhang Y, Sasaki K (2000) Spatial structure in an open city with a subcenter. Ann Reg Sci 34(1): 37–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agarwal, A., Giuliano, G. & Redfearn, C.L. Strangers in our midst: the usefulness of exploring polycentricity. Ann Reg Sci 48, 433–450 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0497-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0497-1