Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A business model for additive manufacturing of recycled plastics towards sustainability

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The manufacturing landscape is ever-changing, and one of the most significant driving forces is the emergence of additive manufacturing (AM), which enables cost-effective and small-scale production towards sustainability. To better align AM with manufacturing in suitable applications, this study proposes a business model in terms of the cost pattern and scaling production supported by three key concepts: standardisation, localisation and collaboration. The ambiguity of the cost calculation is one of the key factors slowing down AM progress, and a lack of a cost pattern affects decision-making when applying AM to appropriate applications. The business model in this study is focused on applying the data collected from previous research, the collection-recycling-manufacturing (CRM) model, to discover the implications of AM processes on the road to sustainable manufacturing. The novel business model envisions the nature of AM characteristics and their linkages to cost patterns, so AM applications can be integrated into a cost-effective process. This study contributes qualitative analysis to the cost patterns’ integration. Through this integration, the business model mediates the gap between technologies and applications via the formulas of cost patterns, so AM can perform its appropriate role in the industry mainstream. The cost modelling proposed in this study derives generic formulas via the unit cost of tooling, moulding, machine, materials, design, miscellaneous cost and the batch size. The business model applies the “divide-and-conquer” concept, convergence effect and data analysis to support quantitative analysis. The model can calculate the total cost per unit, and its accuracy is close to 100%. Through the novelty of this model, AM and conventional manufacturing (CM) cost benchmarking and decision support functions are enabled to aid in stakeholder decision-making. Eventually, appropriate AM technologies and processes can synchronise with localisation, standardisation and collaboration and, ultimately, the impact of AM towards sustainable manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The manuscript does not use source data from a third party. Data availability is not applicant.

Code availability

The manuscript does not use any source code from a third party. Code availability is not applicable.

References

  1. Peeter J et al (2017) Economic and environmental evaluation of design for active disassembly. J Clean Prod 140(3):1182–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. d’Ambrières W (2019) Plastics recycling worldwide: current overview and desirable changes. The journal of field actions Special Issue 19:2019

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu H et al (2022) Additive manufacturing of recycled plastics: strategies towards a more sustainable future. J Clean Prod 335:130236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu H, Yabar H (2021) Impacts of additive manufacturing to sustainable urban–rural interdependence through strategic control. Results Control Optim 5:100066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roxanne Z et al (2019) Energy input and processing flow for plastic recycling. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol: 8(7)

  6. Akinola A, Adeyemi I, Adeyinka F (2014) A proposal for the management of plastic packaging waste. IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol 8(1):71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lazarevic D et al (2010) Plastic waste management in the context of a European recycling society: comparing results and uncertainties in a life cycle perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(2):246–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Merrild H et al (2012) Assessing recycling versus incineration of key materials in municipal waste: the importance of efficient energy recovery and transport distances. Waste Manage 32:1009–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira T, Kennedy J, Potgieter J (2018) A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. 14th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management. Procedia Manuf 30:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang R (2016) Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: the case of lightweight aircraft components. J Clean Prod 135(1):1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen D et al (2015) Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. J Clean Prod 107:615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleera R, Pillerb F (2019) Local manufacturing and structural shifts in competition: market dynamics of additive manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ 216:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Inimake (2021) 3D-printing & additive manufacturing news. Additive news, can be accessed at: https://additivenews.com/inimake/

  14. Mourdoukoutas P (2015) How 3D-printing changes the economics of outsourcing and globalization. Forbes, can be accessed at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2015/07/18/how-3D-printing-changes-the-economics-of-outsourcing-and-globalization/?sh=38bda362a2ab

  15. Truck Driver Institute (2013) The real cost of trucking, can be accessed at: https://www.drivebigtrucks.com/trucking-news/the-real-operating-cost-of-a-commercial-truck/

  16. Volvo Truck Corporation (2018) Emissions from Volvo’s trucks, can be accessed at: https://www.volvotrucks.com/content/dam/volvo/volvo-trucks/markets/global/pdf/our-trucks/Emis_eng_10110_14001.pdf

  17. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2018) Average freight revenue per ton-mile, can be accessed at: https://www.bts.gov/content/average-freight-revenue-ton-mile

  18. Gisario AI et al (2019) Metal additive manufacturing in the commercial aviation industry: a review. J Manuf Syst 53:124–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Daicel Miraizu Ltd (2021) Polymer alloys, thermoplastic compounds/composites, can be accessed at: https://resin.daicelmiraizu.com/en/resin/resin.html

  20. Industry Week (2021) ASTM, boeing, setting additive manufacturing standard for plastics. can be accessed at: https://www.industryweek.com/technology-and-iiot/article/22027659/astm-boeing-setting-additive-manufacturing-standard-for-plastics

  21. Cotteleer M (2014) 3D opportunity for production: additive manufacturing makes its (business) case. Deloitte Review (Deloitte Review Issue 15, can be accessed at: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insight

  22. Simpson T (2019) Additive manufacturing via material extrusion. Addit Manuf. Can be assessed at: https://www.additivemanufacturing.media/articles/additive-manufacturing-with-material-extrusion

  23. Slant 3D (2019) Why 3D printing will replace injection molding. can be accessed at: https://www.slant3d.com/slant3d-blog/why-3d-printing-will-replace-injection-molding

  24. Garmulewicz A, Holweg M, Veldhuis H, Yang A (2016) Redistributing material supply chains for 3D-printing. Redistributing material supply chains for 3D printing. Project Report, University of Oxford press

  25. Chandavarkar A (2020) Wabtec inaugurates additive manufacturing center in Bengaluru. AM Chronicle, can be accessed at: https://www.amchronicle.com/news/wabtec-inaugurates-additive-manufacturing-center-in-bengaluru/

  26. MIT Fab Lab (2021) Fab lab spaces. MIT Wheaton College, can be accessed at: https://wheatoncollege.edu/academics/special-projects-initiatives/innovation-spaces/fab-lab/

  27. Clark J (2017) 3D-printing opportunity for standards: additive manufacturing measures up. Delloitte Insight, accessible at: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/3d-opportunity/additive-manufacturing-standards-for-3d-printed-products.html

  28. Dizona J (2018) Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 20:44–67

    Google Scholar 

  29. ASTM International (2021) Additive manufacturing technology standards, can be accessed at: https://www.astm.org/Standards/additive-manufacturing-technology-standards.html

  30. Karayannidis G, Achilias D (2007) Chemical recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Macromol Mater Eng 292(2):128–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong K, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng

  32. Forster A (2015) Materials testing standards for additive manufacturing of polymer materials: state of the art and standards applicability. Mater Struct Syst Div Eng Lab

  33. ASTM International (2020) Plastics standards, can be accessed at: https://www.astm.org/Standards/plastics-standards.html

  34. Achilias DS et al (2012) Recent advances in the chemical recycling of polymers (PP, PS, LDPE, HDPE, PVC, PC, Nylon, PMMA). Material Recycling - Trends and Perspectives, IntechOpen

  35. Messmer D (2019) Main-chain scission of individual macromolecules induced by solvent swelling. Chem Sci 10:6125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Özkan K, Ergin S, Işık Ş, Işıklı I (2015) A new classification scheme of plastic wastes based upon recycling labels. Waste Manag 35:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Santander P, Sanchez F, Boudaoud H, Camargo M (2020) Closed loop supply chain network for local and distributed plastic recycling for 3D-printing: a MILP-based optimization approach. Resour Conserv Recycl. Elsevier, 154, pp. 104531

  38. AM Additive Manufacturing (2019) Binder jetting, can be accessed at: https://www.additivemanufacturing.media/articles/ford-is-saving-millions-through-3d-printing-but-maybe-not-how-you-think

  39. ISO/ASTM 52903–2:2020(E) (2020) Additive manufacturing — material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of plastic materials Part 2: Process equipment

  40. Sanchez F, Boudaoud H, Muller L, Camargo M (2014) Towards a standard experimental protocol for open source additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 9(3):151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. AM Medical Summit (2021) General AM/3DP ASME resources, can be accessed at: https://event.asme.org/AM-Medical/Resources/Medical-AM-3DP-Resources

  42. Frost & Sullivan's Global Research Team (2016) Global additive manufacturing market, Forecast to 2025. Can be assessed at: https://namic.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/global-additive-manufacturing-market_1.pdf

  43. Hendrixson S (2021) Additive manufacturing will aid and accelerate the circular economy. Addit Manuf. Can be accessed at: https://www.additivemanufacturing.media/additive-manufacturing-will-aid-and-accelerate-the-circular-economy/

  44. Watson J (2019) Additive manufacturing market to reach USD 23.33 Billion By 2026. Rep Data. Can be accessed at: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/03/18/1756526/0/en/Additive-Manufacturing-Market-To-Reach-USD-23-33-Billion-By-2026.html

  45. Aimar A, Palermo A (2019) The role of 3D printing in medical applications: a state of the art. J Healthcare Eng 10:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. EOS (2021) Complex geometries are possible with 3D printing). EOS, can be accessed at: https://www.eos.info/en/industrial-3d-printing/advantages/complex-geometries

  47. Zahnd P (2018) 3D printing in the automotive industry. 3D Printing Industry can be accessed at: https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/3d-printing-automotive-industry-3-132584/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Technology, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, SR6 0DD, UK

    Haishang Wu, Hamid Mehrabi, Nida Naveed & Panagiotis Karagiannidis

Authors
  1. Haishang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamid Mehrabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nida Naveed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Panagiotis Karagiannidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The listed (4) authors contribute 100% of the design, review, writing, experiments and analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haishang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable to this manuscript.

Consent to participate

Not applicable to this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Mehrabi, H., Naveed, N. et al. A business model for additive manufacturing of recycled plastics towards sustainability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 7997–8011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09269-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09269-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation