Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical solution of kth price auction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide an exact analytical solution of the Nash equilibrium for the kth price auction by using inverse of distribution functions. As applications, we identify the unique symmetric equilibrium where the valuations have polynomial distribution, fat tail distribution and exponential distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fibich G, Gavious A (2010) Large auctions with risk-averse bidders. Int J Game Theory 39(3):359–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer Paul, Klemperer P (1999) Auction theory: a guide to the literature. J Econ Surv 13(3):227–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna V (2010) Auction Theory, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin Eric (2004) The unity of auction theory. J Econ Lit 42(4):1102–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monderer Dov, Tennenholtz Moshe (2000) $k$-price auctions. Games Econ Behav 31(2):220–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson Roger B (1981) Optimal auction design. Math Oper Res 6(1):58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawar A-H, Sen D (2018) $k$th price auctions and Catalan numbers. Econ Lett 172:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley John G, Samuelson William F (1981) Optimal auctions. Am Econ Rev 71(3):381–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin W et al (1964) Principles of Mathematical Analysis, vol 3. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey William (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J Finance 16(1):8–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R (1992) Strategic analysis of auctions. In: Auman R, Hart S (eds) Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol 1. Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), Amsterdam, pp 227–279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfstetter E (2001) Third- and higher-price auctions. In: Braulke M, Berninghaus S (eds) Beiträge zur Mikro- und zur Makroökonomik: Festschrift für Hans-Jürgen Ramser. Springer, Berlin, pp 495–503

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The reviewers had a key role in the conception of this article and we are grateful for the reviewers for the very helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Mihelich.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Lemma 6.1

Consider a real valued bounded function \(\hat{Q}:{\mathbb {R}}\mapsto [0,1]\). For positive integer r and positive real number m, let \(A_r(u,z){:=} {\hat{Q}}(z)(u-z)^r z^m\)and \(H_r(u){:=}\int _0^u A_r(u,z) dz\). Then the \((r+1)^{th}\)derivative of \(H_r(u)\)is

$$\begin{aligned} H_r^{(r+1)}(u) = r!\hat{Q}(u)u^m. \end{aligned}$$
(18)

Proof

By the Leibniz rule (Rudin et al. 1964) of differentiating an integral, if \(H(u){:=} \int _{l_0(u)}^{l_1(u)} A(u,z) dz\), under assumption of integrability of \(\partial _u A(u,z)\), it holds:

$$\begin{aligned} H'(u) = \left[ A(u,l_1(u))l_1'(u) - A(u,l_0(u))l_0'(u)\right] +\int _{l_0(u)}^{l_1(u)} \partial _u A(u,z) dz. \end{aligned}$$

It is easy to check the integrability of \(\partial _u{\hat{Q}}(z)(u-z)^r z^m\), thus taking \(l_0(u)=0, l_1(u) = u\) in the previous equation:

$$\begin{aligned} H_r'(u) = A_r(u,u) +\int _0^u \partial _u A_r(u,z) dz. \end{aligned}$$
(19)

For \(r=0\), \(A_0(u,u) = \hat{Q}(u)u^m\) and \(\partial _u A_0(u,z)=0\). For \(r\geqslant 1\), \(A_r(u,u) = 0\) and \(\partial _u A_r(u,z) = \hat{Q}(z)r(u-z)^{r-1}z^m = rA_{r-1}(u,z)\). Therefore (19) implies

$$\begin{aligned} H_r'(u) = rH_{r-1}(u)\quad \text {for}\quad r\geqslant 1\quad \text {and}\quad H_0'(u) = \hat{Q}(u)u^m. \end{aligned}$$

Thus for \(t\leqslant r\):

$$\begin{aligned} H_r^{(t)}(u) = r(r-1)\cdots (r-t+1)H_{r-t}(u), \end{aligned}$$

so \(H_r^{(r)}(u) = r!H_0(u)\) and therefore \(H_r^{(r+1)}(u) = r!H_0'(u) = r!\hat{Q}(u)u^m.\)\(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mihelich, M., Shu, Y. Analytical solution of kth price auction. Int J Game Theory 49, 875–884 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-020-00729-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-020-00729-x

Keywords

Navigation