Skip to main content
Log in

On the shape of the cross-ratio function in bivariate survival models induced by truncated and folded normal frailty distributions

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In shared frailty models for bivariate survival data the frailty is identifiable through the cross-ratio function (CRF), which provides a convenient measure of association for correlated survival variables. The CRF may be used to compare patterns of dependence across models and data sets. We explore the shape of the CRF for the families of one-sided truncated normal and folded normal frailty distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalen OO, Borgan Ø, Gjessing HK (2008) Survival and event history analysis: a process point of view. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JE, Louis TA, Holm NV, Harvald B (1992) Time-dependent association measures for bivariate survival distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 87:641–650

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini A, Capitanio A (2014) The skew-normal and related families. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini A, Kotz S (2003) Log-skew-normal and log-skew-\(t\) distributions as models for family income data. J Income Distrib 11:12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Callegaro A, Iacobelli S (2012) The cox shared frailty model with log-skew normal frailties. Stat Model 12:399–418

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG (1978) A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of family tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65:141–151

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG, Cuzick J (1985) Multivariate generalizations of the proportional hazards model. J R Stat Soci Ser A 148:82–117

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duchateau L, Janssen P (2008) The frailty model. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington CP, Unkel S, Anaya-Izquierdo K (2012) The relative frailty variance and shared frailty models. J R Stat Soc Ser B 74:673–696

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (2000) Analysis of multivariate survival data. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (2014) Frailty models. In: Klein JP, van Houwelingen HC, Ibrahim JG, Scheike TH (eds) Handbook of survival analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 457–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes D (1989) Bivariate survival models induced by frailities. J Am Stat Assoc 84:487–493

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Paik MC, Tsai W-Y, Ottman R (1994) Multivariate survival analysis using piecewise gamma frailty. Biometrics 50:975–988

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org

  • Sahu S K, Dey D K (2004) On a Bayesian multivariate survival model with a skewed frailty. In: Genton M G (ed) Skew-elliptical distributions and their applications: a journey beyond normality. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 321–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan B, Manatunga AK (2001) Diagnostic plots for assessing the frailty distribution in multivariate survival data. Lifetime Data Anal 7:143–155

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wienke A (2011) Frailty models in survival analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges David Ellenberger for proofreading the manuscript. One reviewer made valuable comments and suggestions on the first draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Unkel.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 One-sided truncated normal distribution

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal {K}'(-s/\mu )= & {} \frac{\sigma ^2 s}{\mu ^2} -\frac{\xi }{\mu } - \frac{\sigma \phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu }-\frac{\xi }{\sigma }\right) }{\mu \left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu }-\frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) } \end{aligned}$$
(14)
$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal {K}''(-s/\mu )= & {} \frac{\sigma ^2}{\mu ^2} - \frac{\sigma ^2 \phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } - \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) ^2}{\mu ^2\left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } - \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) ^2 } - \frac{\sigma ^2 \phi ' \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } - \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) }{\mu ^2\left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } - \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) } \end{aligned}$$
(15)

1.2 Folded normal distribution

$$\begin{aligned}&\mathcal {K}'(-s/\mu ) \nonumber \\&\quad = \frac{2\xi \exp (2\xi s/\mu )\left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } +\frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) - \sigma \phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } - \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) - \sigma \exp (2\xi s /\mu )\phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } + \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) }{\mu \left\{ 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } -\frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) + \exp (2\xi s/\mu )\left[ 1- \Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } + \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right] \right\} } + \frac{\sigma ^2 s}{\mu ^2} - \frac{\xi }{\mu } \end{aligned}$$
(16)
$$\begin{aligned}&\mathcal {K}''(-s/\mu )\nonumber \\&\quad = \frac{1}{\mu ^2}\left\{ \frac{4 \xi ^2 \exp (2\xi s/\mu )\left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } + \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) - \sigma ^2 \phi '\left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } -\frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) - \sigma ^2\exp (2\xi s/\mu ) \phi '\left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } +\frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) - 4 \xi \sigma \exp (2\xi s/\mu )\phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } +\frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) }{1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } - \frac{\xi }{\sigma }\right) +\exp (2\xi s/\mu )\left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } + \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) } \right. \nonumber \\&\quad \quad - \left. \frac{\left( 2\xi \exp (2\xi s/\mu )\left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } +\frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) - \sigma \phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } - \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) - \sigma \exp (2\xi s /\mu )\phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } + \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) ^2 }{\left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } - \frac{\xi }{\sigma }\right) +\exp (2\xi s/\mu )\left( 1-\Phi \left( \frac{\sigma s}{\mu } + \frac{\xi }{\sigma } \right) \right) \right) ^2} + \sigma ^2 \right\} \end{aligned}$$
(17)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Unkel, S. On the shape of the cross-ratio function in bivariate survival models induced by truncated and folded normal frailty distributions. Metrika 80, 351–362 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-016-0608-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-016-0608-6

Keywords

Navigation