Abstract
In Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) using L-band frequencies, the ionosphere causes signal delays that correspond with link related range errors of up to 100 m. In a first order approximation the range error is proportional to the total electron content (TEC) of the ionosphere. Whereas this first order range error can be corrected in dual-frequency measurements by a linear combination of carrier phase- or code-ranges of both frequencies, single-frequency users need additional information to mitigate the ionospheric error. This information can be provided by TEC maps deduced from corresponding GNSS measurements or by ionospheric models. In this paper we discuss and compare different ionospheric correction methods for single-frequency users. The focus is on the comparison of the positioning quality using dual-frequency measurements, the Klobuchar model, the NeQuick model, the IGS TEC maps, the Neustrelitz TEC Model (NTCM-GL) and the reconstructed NTCM-GL TEC maps both provided via the ionosphere data service SWACI (http://swaciweb.dlr.de) in near real-time. For that purpose, data from different locations covering several days in 2011 and 2012 are investigated, including periods of quiet and disturbed ionospheric conditions. In applying the NTCM-GL based corrections instead of the Klobuchar model, positioning accuracy improvements up to several meters have been found for the European region in dependence on the ionospheric conditions. Further in mid- and low-latitudes the NTCM-GL model provides results comparable to NeQuick during the considered time periods. Moreover, in regions with a dense GNSS ground station network the reconstructed NTCM-GL TEC maps are partly at the same level as the final IGS TEC maps.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allain DJ, Mitchell CN (2008) Ionospheric delay corrections for single-frequency GPS receivers over Europe using tomographic mapping. GPS Solut. doi:10.1007/s10291-008-0107-y
Angrisano A, Gaglione S, Gioia C, Massaro M, Robustelli U (2013) Assessment of NeQuick ionospheric model for Galileo single-frequency users. Acta Geophys. doi:10.2478/s11600-013-0116-2
Covington AE (1969) Solar Radio Emission at 10.7 cm, 1947–1968. J Roy Astron Soc Can 63/3:125–132
DOD SPS, Department of Defense USA (2008) Global positioning system standard positioning service performance standard, 4th edn. http://www.gps.gov/technical/ps/2008-SPS-performance-standard. Accessed 6 Jan 2012
EUROCONTROL Robert E (2012) Eurocontrol space weather activities. Space Weather Workshop, Boulder/CO
Feltens J, Angling M, Jackson-Booth N, Jakowski N, Hoque M, Hernández-Pajares M, Aragón-Àngel A, Orús R, Zandbergen R (2011) Comparative testing of four ionospheric models driven with GPS measurements. Radio Sci 46:RS0D12. doi:10.1029/2010RS004584
Galileo SIS ICD, European Commission (2010) European GNSS (Galileo) open service, signal in space interface control document. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/satnav/galileo/open-service/. Accessed 30 Mar 2011
GGOS, global geodetic observing system. http://ggosatm.hg.tuwien.ac.at/
Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Orús R, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A (2009) The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geod 83:263–275. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1
Hochegger G, Nava B, Radicella SM, Leitinger R (2000) A family of ionospheric models for different uses. Phys Chem Earth 25/4:307–310
Hoque MM, Jakwoski N (2013) Mitigation of ionospheric mapping function error. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS+, Nashville/Tennessee/USA, 16–20 Sept
IGS, International GNSS Service. http://www.igs.org
IS-GPS-200F, Global Positioning System Directorate, Systems Engineering & Integration (2011) Interface specification, IS-GPS-200F. http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pdf/IS-GPS-200F. Accessed 5 Sept 2012
Jakowski N, Hoque MM, Mayer C (2011a) A new global TEC model for estimating transionospheric radio wave propagation errors. J Geod 85/12:965–974. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0455-1
Jakowski N, Mayer C, Hoque MM, Wilken V (2011b) Total electron content models and their use in ionosphere monitoring. Radio Sci 46:RS0D18
Klobuchar J (1987) Ionospheric time-delay algorithm for single-frequency GPS users. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys 23:325–332
Misra P, Enge P (2001) Global positioning system: signals, measurements, and performance. Ganga-Jamuna Press, Massachusetts
Nava B, Coisson P, Radicella SM (2008) A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phy 70:1856–1862. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2008.01.015
Orús R, Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, García-Fernández A. (2002) Performance of different TEC models to provide GPS ionospheric corrections. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phy 64:2055–2062. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1. http://gage6.upc.es/gAGE_WEB/papers/2003/sdarticle. Accessed 20 Nov 2013
Radicella SM (2009) The NeQuick model genesis, uses and evolution. Ann Geophys-Italy 52(3):417–422
Rose ARJ, Allain DJ, Mitchell C (2009) Reduction in the ionospheric error for a single-frequency GPS timing solution using tomography. Ann Geophys Italy 52/5:469–486
Rostoker G (1972) Geomagnetic Indices. Rev Geophys Space Ge 10/4:935–950
RTCA-DO229D (2006) Minimum operational performance standards for global positioning system/wide area augmentation system airborne equipment. 13 Dec
Schaer S, Gurtner W, Feltens J. (1998) IONEX: The IONosphere Map EXchange Format Version 1. In: Proceedings of the IGS analysis centers workshop, ESOC, Darmstadt, 9–11 February. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/data/format/ionex1. Accessed 10 Oct 2012
Schueler T. (2001) On Ground-Based GPS Tropospheric Delay Estimation. Dissertation, University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich
Seeber G (2003) Satellite Geodesy, 2nd edn. de Gruyter Press, Berlin/Germany
SPIDR, Space Physics Interactive Data Resource. http://spidr.ngdc.noaa.gov/spidr/dataset.do
Suard N, Azair JM, Gadat S, Debailleux D, Rifa E (2011) Assessment of an ionosphere storm occurence risk. European Navigation Conference, London 29 November–1 December
SWACI, Space Weather Application Center Ionosphere. http://swaciweb.dlr.de
Tetewsky A, Ross J, Soltz A, Vaughn N, Anszperger J, O’Brien C, Graham D, Craig D, Lozow J. (2009) Making sense of GPS inter-signal corrections: satellite calibration parameters in legacy and modernized ionosphere correction algorithms. Inside GNSS 4(2): 37–48. http://www.insidegnss.com/auto/julyaug09-tetewsky-final. Accessed 5 Nov 2013
WDC Kyoto, World Data Center for Geomagnetism Kyoto. http://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to the editors and reviewers for their remarks for the improvement of this paper. Additionally we thank IGS, SPIDR and WDC Kyoto for making available high quality GNSS and geo-related data. Further we would like to express our gratitude to the Aeronomy and Radiopropagation Laboratory of the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics Trieste/Italy providing NeQuick version 2.0.2 for scientific purposes. Finally, thanks to our colleagues of DLR’s Institute of Communications and Navigation maintaining provision of GNSS measurements via EVnet and to our colleagues of DLR’s Earth Observation Center supporting the SWACI service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minkwitz, D., Gerzen, T., Wilken, V. et al. Application of SWACI products as ionospheric correction for single-point positioning: a comparative study. J Geod 88, 463–478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0698-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0698-8