Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attachment orientations and entrepreneurship

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research presents a theoretical model and examines it empirically to associate attachment orientations with various types of entrepreneurs. The results show clear evidence that attachment orientations not only predict an adult’s tendency to become an entrepreneur but also the type of entrepreneur he will become. Specifically, the results show that attachment anxiety is the dimension that is the most responsible for the variability of becoming an entrepreneur, while anxiety and avoidant dimensions predict his characteristics and attitudes as an entrepreneur. This paper makes five important contributions to the research of both attachment theory and entrepreneurship. First, it adds to the theoretical understanding of the psychology of entrepreneurs. Second, the attachment theory enables us to extend our understanding beyond the predictions of personality traits regarding entrepreneurial intentions in order to further predict the type of entrepreneur he will turn out to be. Third, it stresses the role of early childhood events regarding the prediction of future entrepreneurial orientation. Fourth, it uses a unique data set of real young entrepreneurs in a single industry homogenous design in Israel, which is known worldwide as a startup nation. Fifth, it focuses on the opportunity validation stage (rather than the opportunity identification of the resource allocation stages), which is often neglected in entrepreneur personality research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The individuals in these studies were volunteers attending a specialized College as a part of their graduate or undergraduate business administration studies. I used this sample because all volunteers were in the process of attaining a degree geared at reaching job-oriented goals and would therefore be affected by obstacles such as organizational death that might threaten their job security.

  2. In Study 2, we added some more items following the analyses of Study 1’s data and in order to achieve better in-depth understanding of the prediction power of attachment dimensions on entrepreneurship.

  3. We first conducted an independent samples t-test to see whether there were gender differences in any of our dependent variables. The only significant difference was regarding the item related to the preference for becoming a sole vs. a team entrepreneur (t(76) = 2.26, p = 0.027). However, in the regression analyses, we also entered gender as a constant in the first step of the analyses.

References

  • Acs Z (2006) How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations 1(1):97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S (1978) Patterns of Attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez SA, Busenitz LW (2001) The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. J Manag 27(6):755–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili A, Cardozo R, Ray S (2003) A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. J Bus Ventur 18(1):105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RA, Markman GD (2000) Beyond social capital: how social skills can enhance Entrepreneurs' success. Acad Manag Exec 14(1):106–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RA, Markman GD (2003) Beyond social capital: the role of entrepreneurs’ social competence in their financial success. J Bus Ventur 18:41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JR, Locke EA (2004) The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. J Appl Psychol 89(4):587

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1993) Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: existence and bounds. J Bus Ventur 8(3):197–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley TM, Boyd DP (1988) Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. J Bus Ventur 2(1):79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Hafaïedh C (2017) Entrepreneurial teams research in movement. Research Handbook on Entrepreneurial Teams: Theory and Practice. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 11–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman AJ (2004) Entrepreneurs: interrelationships between their characteristics, values, expectations. Griffith University, Management Practices and SME Performance

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank S (2013a) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harv Bus Rev 91(5):63–72

  • Blank S (2013b) The four steps to the epiphany: Successful strategies for products that win. BookBaby

  • Blank, S. (2012). The startup Owner's manual: the step-by-step guide for building a great company. BookBaby

  • Block J, Sandner P (2009) Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs and their duration in selfemployment: evidence from German micro data. J Ind Compet Trade 9(2):117–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Block JH, Wagner M (2010) Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs in Germany: characteristics and earnings differentials. Schmalenbach Business Review 62(2):154–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Blustein DL, Prezioso MS, Schultheiss DP (1995) Attachment theory and career development: current status and future directions. Couns Psychol 23:416–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, C. M. (1975). Locus of control, need for achievement and entrepreneurship (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning)

  • Bosma N, Van Praag M, Thurik R, De Wit G (2004) The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Bus Econ 23(3):227–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby J (1969) Attachment and Loss: Attachment. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby J (1973) Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: anxiety and anger. Basic Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby J (1979) The making and breaking of affectional bonds. BasicBooks, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby J (1988) A Secure Base: clinical applications of attachment theory. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter H (2011) Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: a look at five meta-analyses. Personal Individ Differ 51(3):222–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR (1998) Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: an integrative overview. In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS (eds) Attachment theory and close relationships. Guilford Press, New York, pp 46–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus RH (1980) Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Acad Manag J 23(3):509–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus RH, Horwitz PS (1986) The psychology of the entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship: Crit Perspect Bus Manag 2:260–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush CG, Greene PG, Hart MM (2001) From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a Resource Base. Acad Manag Exec 15(1):64–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke AE, FitzRoy FR, Nolan MA (2008) What makes a die-hard entrepreneur? Beyond the employee or entrepreneur’ dichotomy. Small Bus Econ 31(2):93–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo M, Fossen F, Kritikos AS (2014) Personality characteristics and the decisions to become and stay self-employed. Small Business Economy 42:787–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnelley KB, Ruscher JB (2000) Adult attachment and exploratory behavior in leisure. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 15:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy J, Kobak RR (1988) Avoidance and its telation to other defensive processes. Clinical implications of attachment. In: Belsky J, Nezworski T (eds) Clinical implications of attachment. Child psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, England, pp 300–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsrud A, Brännback M (2011) Entrepreneurial motivations: what do we still need to know? J Small Bus Manag 49(1):9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler GN, Lyon DW (2001) Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: the past decade. Entrep Theory Pract 25(4):101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Chell E (1985) The entrepreneurial personality: a few ghosts laid to rest? Int Small Bus J 3(3):43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciavarella MA, Buchholtz AK, Riordan CM, Gatewood RD, Stokes GS (2004) The big five and venture survival: is there a linkage? J Bus Ventur 19(4):465–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins CJ, Hanges PJ, Locke EA (2004) The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: a meta-analysis. Hum Perform 17(1):95–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins OF, Moore DG, Unwalla D (1964) The enterprising man and the business executive. MSU Bus Top 12(1):19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins NL, Read SJ (1990) Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol 58:644–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AC (1973) Technical entrepreneurship: What do we know? R&D Management 3:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR (1992) Four ways five factors are basic. Personal Individ Differ 13(6):653–665

  • Covin JG (1991) Entrepreneurial versus conservative firms: a comparison of strategies and performance. J Manag Stud 28(5):439–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Crant JM (1996) The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. J Small Bus Manag 34(3):42

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitz R, Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Izsak R, Popper M (2007) Leaders as attachment figures: leaders’ attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers’ performance and mental health. J Pers Soc Psychol 93:632–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (1995). Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Paper prepared for the RENT IX Workshop, Piacenza, Italy, Nov. 23–24, 1995

  • Davidson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 18(3):301–331

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Witte M, De-Houwer J (2008) Proximity and distance goals in adult attachment. Eur J Personal 22:675–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond LM, Fagundes CP (2008) Developmental perspectives on links between attachment and affect regulation over the lifespan. In: Kail RV (ed) Advances in child development and behavior, 36. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US, pp 83–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol 41(1):417–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing HM, Nauta MM (2010) Separation-individuation, exploration, and identity diffusion as mediators of the relationship between attachment and career indecision. J Career Dev 36:207–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Doverspike D, Hollis LA, Justice A, Polomsky M (1997) Correlations between leadership styles as measured by the least preferred co-worker scale and adults' attachment styles. Psychol Rep 81:1148–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkelberg WC, Cooper AC (1982) Entrepreneurial Typologies. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research:1–15

  • Eckhardt JT, Shane SA (2003) Opportunities and entrepreneurship. J Manag 29(3):333–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot AJ, Reis HT (2003) Attachment and exploration in adulthood. J Pers Soc Psychol 85(2):317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney BC, Cassidy J, Ramos-Marcuse F (2008) The generalization of attachment representations to new social situations: predicting behavior during initial interactions with strangers. J Pers Soc Psychol 95:1481–1498

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney BC, Van Vleet M (2010) Growing through attachment: the interplay of attachment and exploration in adulthood. J Soc Pers Relat 27:226–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeser HR, Willard GE (1990) Founding strategy and performance: a comparison of high and low growth high tech firms. Strateg Manag J 11(2):87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Filion LJ (2004) Operators and visionaries: differences in the entrepreneurial and managerial Systems of two Types of entrepreneurs. Int J Entrep Small Bus 1(1):35–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner WB (1988) Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. Am J Small Bus 12(4):11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner WB, Shaver KG, Gatewood E, Katz JA (1994) Finding the entrepreneur in entrepreneurship. Entrep: Theory & Pract 18(3):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasse Y (1982) Elaborations on the psychology of the entrepreneur. Encyclopedia Entrep:57–71

  • Gillath O, Mikulincer M, Fitzsimons GM, Shaver PR, Schachner DA, Barg JA (2006) Automatic activation of attachment-related goals. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 32:1375–1388

    Google Scholar 

  • Green JD, Campbell W (2000) Attachment and exploration in adults: chronic and contextual accessibility. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 26:452–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Hennessy S, Reis HT (1998) Openness in processing social information among attachment types. Pers Relat 5:449–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansemark OC (2003) Need for achievement, locus of control and the prediction of business start-ups: a longitudinal study. J Econ Psychol 24(3):301–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper DA (2008) Towards a theory of entrepreneurial teams. J Bus Ventur 23(6):613–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazan C, Shaver PR (1990) Love and work: an attachment-theoretical perspective. J Pers Soc Psychol 59:270–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse E (1999) The adult attachment interview: historical and current perspectives. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds) Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications. Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, pp 395–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornaday JA, Aboud J (1971) Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs. Pers Psychol 24(2):141–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornaday RW (1990) Dropping the E-words from small business research: an alternative typology. J Small Bus Manag 28(4):22–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm JB, Shuman JC, Seeger JA, Nurick AJ (1990) Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: a research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 14(4):7–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson TU, Blustein DL (1997) Attachment relationships and the career exploration process. Career Dev Q 46:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner IM (1978) Entrepreneurship, entitlement, and economic justice. East Econ J 4(1):9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafuente A, Salas V (1989) Types of entrepreneurs and firms: the case of new Spanish firms. Strateg Manag J 10(1):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutner F, Ahmetoglu G, Akhtar R, Chamorro-Premuzic T (2014) The relationship between the entrepreneurial personality and the big five personality traits. Personal Individ Differ 63:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao J, Welsch H (2005) Roles of social capital in venture creation: key dimensions and research implications. J Small Bus Manag 43(4):345–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Littunen H (2000) Entrepreneurship and the characteristics of the entrepreneurial personality. Int J Entrep Behav Res 6(6):295–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (2010) ued. National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Vol. 2. Anthem Press

  • McClelland DC (1965) N achievement and entrepreneurship: a longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol 1(4):389

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith P, Merson K, Strong J (2007) Differences in adult attachment style, career choice and career satisfaction for occupation therapy and commerce students. Occup Therapy 70:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M (1997) Adult attachment style and information processing: individual differences in curiosity and cognitive closure. J Pers Soc Psychol 72:1217–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M (1998) Adult attachment style and affect regulation: strategic variations in self-appraisals. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:420–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M, Florian V (1995) Appraisal of and coping with a real-life stressful situation: the contribution of attachment styles. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 21:406–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M, Florian V (1998) The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS (eds) Attachment theory and close relationships. Guilford, New York, pp 143–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M, Orbach I, Iavnieli D (1998) Adult attachment style and affect regulation: strategic variations in subjective self-other similarity. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:436–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (2003) The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (2007) Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Rom E (2011) The effects of implicit and explicit security priming on creative problem solving. Cognit Emot 25:519–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1848) Principles of political economy, with some of their applications to social philosophy. Parker, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner JB (1990) Entrepreneurs, high growth entrepreneurs, and managers: contrasting and overlapping motivational patterns. J Bus Ventur 5(4):221–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner JB (1997) A psychological typology of successful entrepreneurs. Greenwood Publishing Group

  • Miner JB (2000) Testing a psychological typology of entrepreneurship using business founders. J Appl Behav Sci 36(1):43–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner JB, Smith NR, Bracker JS (1992) Defining the inventor-entrepreneur in the context of established typologies. J Bus Ventur 7(2):103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JR, Mitchell RK, Randolph-Seng B (2014) Handbook of entrepreneurial cognition. Edward Elgar Publishing

  • Mitchell RK, Busenitz L, Lant T, McDougall PP, Morse EA, Smith JB (2004) The distinctive and inclusive domain of entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrep Theory Prac 28(6):505–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Noftle EE, Shaver PR (2006) Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. J Res Pers 40:179–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer M (1971) The application of psychological testing to entrepreneurial potential. Calif Manag Rev 13(3):32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper M, Mayseless O (2003) Back to basics: applying patenting perspective to transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly 14:41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper M, Mayseless O, Castelnovo O (2000) Transformational leadership and attachment. Leadership Quarterly 11:267–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch A, Frese M (2007) Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: a meta-analysis on the relationship between business Owners' personality traits, business creation, and success. Eur J Work Organ Psy 16(4):353–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich RB (1987) Entrepreneurship reconsidered: the team as hero. Harvard Business Review. 65(3):77–83

  • Reynolds PD, Hay M, Camp SM (1999) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership, Kansas City, Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds P, Bosma N, Autio E, Hunt S, De Bono N, Servais I, Chin N (2005) Global entrepreneurship monitor: data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Bus Econ 24(3):205–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards DA, Schat ACH (2011) Attachment at (not to) work: applying attachment theory to explain individual behavior in organizations. J Appl Psychol 96:169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: how Today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PB, Huefner JC, Keith Hunt H (1991) Entrepreneurial research on student subjects does not generalize to real world entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Manag 29(2):42

    Google Scholar 

  • Rom E, Mikulincer M (2003) Attachment theory and group processes: the association between attachment style and group-related representations goals, memories, and functioning. J Pers Soc Psychol 84:1220–1235

    Google Scholar 

  • Roney A, Meredith P, Strong J (2004) Attachment styles and factors affecting career choice of occupational therapy students. Br J OccupTher 67:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD (2009) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing

  • Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev 26(2):243–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Vol. 55). Transaction publishers

  • Shan H (2009) Practices on the periphery: highly educated Chinese immigrant women negotiating occupational settlement in Canada. Can J Study Adult Educ 21(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane SA (2003) A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Shaver PR, Hazan C (1993) Adult romantic attachment: theory and evidence. In: Perlman D, Jones W (eds) Advances in personal relationships. Jessica Kingsley, London, pp 29–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel R, Siegel E, Macmillan IC (1993) Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures. J Bus Ventur 8(2):169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. R. (1967). The entrepreneur and his firm: The Relationship between Type of Man and Type of Company. Occasional Papers, Bureau of Business and Economic Research, Michigan State University, 109

  • Smith NR, Miner JB (1983) Type of entrepreneur, type of firm, and managerial motivation: implications for organizational life cycle theory. Strateg Manag J 4(4):325–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart WH, Roth PL (2007) A meta-analysis of achievement motivation differences between entrepreneurs and managers. J Small Bus Manag 45(4):401–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart Jr, Wayne H, and Roth PL (2001) Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol 86(1):145

  • Sumer HC, Knight PA (2001) How do people with different attachment styles balance work and family. A personality perspective on work-family linkage. J Appl Psychol (4):653–663

  • Timmons JA (1989) The entrepreneurial mind. Brick House Publishing, Andover, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokar DM, Withrow JR, Hall RJ, Moradi B (2003) Psychological separation, attachment security, vocational self-concept crystallization, and career indecision: a structural equation analysis. J Couns Psychol 50:3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Towler A (2005) Charismatic leadership development: role of parental attachment style and parental psychological control. J Leadersh Org Stu 11:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars A and Hampden-Turner C (2002) 21 leaders for the 21st century: how innovative leaders manage in the digital age. McGraw-Hill Companies

  • Van Praag CM, Cramer JS (2001) The toots of entrepreneurship and labor demand: individual ability and low risk aversion. Economica 68(269):45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheu, I, Thurik R, Hessels J, & van der Zwan P (2010) Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. EIM Research Reports h, 201011, 1–24

  • Watson WE, Ponthieu LD, Critelli JW (1995) Team interpersonal process effectiveness in venture partnerships and its connection to perceived success. J Bus Ventur 10:393–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead P, Wright M (1998) Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: are they different? J Bus Ventur 13(3):173–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead P, Ucbasaran D, Wright M (2005) Decisions, actions, and performance: do novice, serial, and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? J Small Bus Manag 43(4):393–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaakobi E (2014) From birth to death. Ono Academic College, Kiryat-Ono

    Google Scholar 

  • Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza HJ (2001) Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strateg Manag J 22(6-7):587–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelekha Y, Avnimelech G, Sharabi E (2014) The effect of religion on entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 42(4):747–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Seibert SE (2006) The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta-analytical review. J Appl Psychol 91(2):259–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Seibert SE, Hills GE (2005) The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. J Appl Psychol 90(6):1265

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Seibert SE, Lumpkin GT (2010) The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: a meta-analytic review. J Manag 36(2):381–404

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaron Zelekha.

Appendices

Appendix 1 Questions in the Entrepreneurship Survey – Study 1

  1. 1.

    Different dimensions of entrepreneurship style – what do low and high scores imply?

    1. 1.1

      Low (1) – necessity entrepreneur / High (8) – opportunity entrepreneur

    2. 1.2

      Low (1) – life-style entrepreneur / High (8) – serial or portfolio entrepreneur

    3. 1.3

      Low (1) – serial entrepreneur / High (8) – portfolio entrepreneur

    4. 1.4

      Low (1) – high persistence / High (8) – low persistence

    5. 1.5

      Low (1) – leave a venture after a while / High (8) – life-style entrepreneur

    6. 1.6

      Low (1) – leave to a new venture / High (8) – leave to a salaried employment

    7. 1.7

      Low (1) – sole entrepreneur / High (8) – team entrepreneur

    8. 1.8

      Low (1) – team with friends / High (8) – team with strangers

    9. 1.9

      Low (1) – Innovative venture / High (8) - operational venture

  2. 2.

    Type of entrepreneur (only one of the following can be 1)

    1. 2.1

      Visionary entrepreneur: 0 – No / 1 – Yes

    2. 2.2

      Managerial/operational entrepreneur: 0 – No / 1 – Yes

    3. 2.3

      Innovative entrepreneur: 0 – No / 1 – Yes

    4. 2.4

      Super marketing entrepreneur: 0 – No / 1 – Yes

  3. 3.

    The main motivation to become an entrepreneur (1 to 5 scale)

    1. 3.1

      Financial return: 1 – Disagree Strongly / 5 – Agree Strongly.

    2. 3.2

      Self-fulfillment and Need for Achievement: 1 – Disagree Strongly / 5 – Agree Strongly.

    3. 3.3

      Desire for independence: 1 – Disagree Strongly / 5 – Agree Strongly.

    4. 3.4

      Desire for social recognition: 1 – Disagree Strongly / 5 – Agree Strongly.

    5. 3.5

      Desire for Authority / Responsibility / Power: 1 – Disagree Strongly / 5 – Agree Strongly.

    6. 3.6

      Need for new challenges / Escape from boredom: 1 – Disagree Strongly / 5 – Agree Strongly.

    7. 3.7

      Desire to change the market/bring in new innovation: 1 – Disagree Strongly / 5 – Agree Strongly.

    8. 3.8

      Desire to change society/the world: 1 – Disagree Strongly / 5 – Agree Strongly

  4. 4.

    After how many failures will you definitely stop entrepreneurial attempts?

  5. 5.

    Are you a part-time entrepreneur (work parallel as a salaried employee)?

  6. 6.

    How many years of experience you have in the employment market?

  7. 7.

    How many work position did you have in your carrier?

  8. 8.

    What is your gender?

  9. 9.

    Are you married?

  10. 10.

    Do you have children?

Appendix 2 Questions in the Entrepreneurship Survey – Study 2

What do low and high scores imply? 1 – Disagree Strongly / 7 – Agree Strongly

  1. 1.1

    External trigger to becoming an entrepreneur

  2. 1.2

    Internal trigger to becoming an entrepreneur

  3. 1.3

    Entrepreneurship is a onetime experience for me

  4. 1.4

    Entrepreneurship is a way of life for me

  5. 1.5

    If my venture will fail I will prefer to start a new venture

  6. 1.6

    If my venture will fail I will prefer to become a salary employee

  7. 1.7

    If my venture will succeeded (via an M&A) I will prefer to start a new venture

  8. 1.8

    If my venture will succeeded (via an M&A) I will prefer to become a salary employee

  9. 1.9

    I prefer to establish a venture as a sole entrepreneur

  10. 1.10

    I prefer to establish a venture with a partner

  11. 1.11

    If I will establish a venture with a partner, I prefer to do it with a partner I did not know before

  12. 1.12

    If I will establish a venture with a partner, I prefer to do it with a friend

Appendix 3 ECR Survey - Experiences in Close Relationships (both studies)

Instructions: The following statements concern how you feel in close relationships with others. The term “other people” relates to other people who have close relationships with you. We are interested in how you generally experience relationships, not just in what is happening in current relationships. Respond to each statement by using the following rating scale:

 

Disagree strongly

Neutral

Agree strongly

1. I prefer not to show other people how I feel deep down

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2. I worry about being abandoned

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

3. I am very comfortable being close to other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

4. I worry a lot about my relationships

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

5. Just when other people starts to get close to me I find myself pulling away

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

6. I worry that other people won’t care about me as much as I care about them

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

7. I get uncomfortable when a other people wants to be very close

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8. I worry a fair amount about losing other people who are close to me

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9. I don’t feel comfortable opening up to other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

10. I often wish that other people’s feelings for me were as strong as my feelings for them

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

11. I want to get close to other people, but I keep pulling back

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

12. I often want to merge completely with other people, and this sometimes scares them away

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

13. I am nervous when other people get too close to me

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

14. I worry about being alone

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

15. I feel comfortable sharing my private thoughts and feelings with other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

16. My desire to be very close sometimes scares people away

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

17. I try to avoid getting too close to other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

18. I need a lot of reassurance that I am loved by other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

19. I find it relatively easy to get close to other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

20. Sometimes, I feel that I force my partners to show more feeling, more commitment

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

21. I find it difficult to allow myself to depend on other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

22. I do not often worry about being abandoned

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

23. I prefer not be too close to other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

24. If I can’t get other people to show interest in me, I get upset or angry

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

25. I tell other people just about everything

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

26. I find that my other people don’t want to get as close as I would like

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

27. I usually discuss my problems and concerns with other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

28. When am not involved in a relationship, I feel somewhat anxious and insecure

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

29. I feel comfortable depending other people

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

30. I get frustrated when other people disapprove of me; I feel really bad about myself

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

31. I don’t mind asking other people for comfort, advice or help

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

32. I get frustrated if other people are not available when I need them

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

33. It helps to turn to my other people in times of need.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

34. When other people disapprove of me, I feel really bad about myself

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

35. I turn to other people for many things, including comfort and reassurance

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

36. I resent it when other people spend time away from me

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zelekha, Y., Yaakobi, E. & Avnimelech, G. Attachment orientations and entrepreneurship. J Evol Econ 28, 495–522 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0570-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0570-8

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation