Abstract
The aim of this study is to understand the process of new routine introduction and its effects on organizational structure and performance. To achieve this, it proposes a model of new routine introduction based on a notion of micro-level entrepreneurship. The model tracks the source of new routine antecedents, defined as factors motivating the conception and/or adoption of ideas for new routines, tying them to organizational structure and performance. Currently, the literature on routine micro foundations lacks this kind of integrative, holistic model to spur fruitful connections between nascent and dispersed contributions related to the origins of new routines. Applying a process approach in the context of a single case study, the research analyzes 23 instances of new routine introduction at an Australian consulting firm called Secure. The results reveal that ideas for new routines were heavily influenced by endogenous factors such as the personal preferences of enterprising managers and internal pressure. While market-related factors were omnipresent, endogenous factors were remarkably preponderant, influential, and oftentimes mixed with exogenous factors such that an either/or distinction in the origins of flexibility- and efficiency-oriented routines did not hold. The findings also shed light on a paradox related to new routine introduction in which the act of introducing new routines intended to improve performance actually undermines it by inciting conflict. Ultimately the model of new routine introduction bestows a central role on the enterprising manager, showing how they oscillate between managerial and micro-level entrepreneurial action in the pursuit of adaptation and growth. This study’s bringing back of the individual and his or her subjectivity into the routine introduction process is in line with recent calls for further research, as is its provision of an empirically detailed case-based analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Secure and all personal names used in this paper are pseudonyms
References
Abell P, Felin T, Foss N (2008) Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Manag Decis Econ 29(6):489–502
Aldrich HE, Yang T (2014) How do entrepreneurs know what to do? Learning and organizing in new ventures. J Evol Econ 24:59–82
Becker MC (2004) Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Ind Corp Chang 13:643–678
Becker MC (2005) The concept of routines: some clarifications. Camb J Econ 29:249–262
Becker MC, Knudsen T, March JG (2006) Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty. Ind Corp Chang 15(2):353–371
Bennet, A. & George, A. L. (1997). Process tracing in case study research. Paper presented at the MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA), Harvard University, October 17-19
Bertels S, Howard-Grenville J, Pek S (2016) Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: the role of culture in the integration of routines. Organ Sci 27(3):573–593
Bloodgood JM, Hornsby JS, Burkemper AC, Sarooghi H (2015) A system dynamics perspective of corporate entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 45(2):383–402
Bridoux, F., Coeurderoy, R. & Durand, R. (2016) Heterogeneous social motives and interactions: The three predictable paths of capability development. Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2605
Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Adm Sci Q 42(1):1–34
Bryant PT (2014) Imprinting by design: the microfoundations of entrepreneurial adaptation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38(5):1081–1102
Bryant, P., Lazaric, N., & Niang, M. (2012). When past and present collide: The consequences of conflict between imprinted memory and contemporary experience (No. halshs-00908420)
Burgelman RA (1983) Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: insights from a process study. Manag Sci 29(12):1349–1364
Burgelman RA (1991) Intraorganizational ecology of strategy-making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organ Sci 2(3):239–262
Burgelman RA (1994) Fading memories: a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Adm Sci Q 39(1):24–56
Burns J (2000) The dynamics of accounting change inter-play between new practices, routines, institutions, power and politics. Account Audit Account J 13(5):566–596
Cacciatori E (2012) Resolving conflict in problem-solving: systems of artefacts in the development of new routines. J Manag Stud 49:1559–1585
Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study. Organ Sci 5(4):554–568
Cohen MD, Burkhart R, Dosi G, Egidi M, Marengo L, Warglien M, Winter S (1996) Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: contemporary research issues. Ind Corp Chang 5(3):653–698
Cohendet P, Llerena P (2003) Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm. Ind Corp Chang 12(2):271–297
Cohendet P, Grandadam D, Simon L, Capdevila I (2014) Epistemic communities, localization and the dynamics of knowledge creation. J Econ Geogr 14(5):929–954
Collins J (2001) Good to great. Random House, London
Coriat, B., & Dosi, G. (1995). Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: on the co-evolution of competences, conflicts and organisational routines. IIASA Working Paper, WP-95-006
D’Adderio L (2014) The replication dilemma unravelled: how organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organ Sci 25(5):1325–1350
Duncan RB (1976) The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization 1:167–188
Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q 46(4):685–716
Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550
Eisenhardt KM (2000) Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: the new language of change and pluralism. Acad Manag Rev 25(4):703–705
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J 21(10–11):1105–1121
Eisenhardt K, Furr N, Bingham C (2010) Microfoundations of performance: balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ Sci 21(6):1263–1273
Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ Sci 11(6):611–629
Feldman M, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Adm Sci Q 48(1):94–118
Feldman MS, Pentland BT, D’Adderio L, Lazaric N (2016) Beyond routines as things: introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organ Sci 27(3):505–513
Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations
Felin T, Foss NJ (2009) Organizational routines and capabilities: historical drift and a course correction toward microfoundations. Scand J Manag 25:157–167
Felin T, Foss NJ (2011) The endogenous origins of experience, routines and organizational capabilities: the poverty of stimulus. J Inst Econ 7(2):231–256
Felin T, Foss NJ (2012) The (proper) microfoundations of routines and capabilities: a response to Winter, Pentland, Hodgson and Knudsen. J Inst Econ 8(2):271–288
Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies of qualitative research. Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, London
Greve HR (2008) A behavioral theory of firm growth: sequential attention to size and performance goals. Acad Manag J 51(3):476–494
Guth, W. D., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Guest editors' introduction: corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 5-15
Hayton JC, Kelley DJ (2006) A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management 45(3):407–427
Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Sirmon DG, Trahms CA (2011) Strategic entrepreneurship: creating value for individuals, organizations, and society. Acad Manag Perspect 25(2):57–75
Hodgson, G (2003) The Mystery of the Routine: The Darwinian Destiny of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Revue économique 54(2):355–384
Hodgson GM, Knudsen T (2004) The firm as an interactor: firms as vehicles for habits and routines. J Evol Econ 14(3):281–307
Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Camp SM, Sexton DL (2001) Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Acad Manag Perspect 15(1):49–63
Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Simon DG (2003) A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. J Manag 29(6):963–989
Ireland RD, Covin JG, Kuratko DF (2009) Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Enterp Theory Pract 33(1):19–46
Jansen JJ, Tempelaar MP, Van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2009) Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organ Sci 20(4):797–811
Jensen RJ, Szulanski G (2007) Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Manag Sci 53(11):1716–1730
Kantur D (2016) Strategic entrepreneurship: mediating the entrepreneurial orientation-performance link. Manag Decis 54(1):24–43
Kellermanns FW, Eddleston KA (2006) Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: a family perspective. Enterp Theory Pract 30(6):809–830
Kimberly JR, Bouchikhi H (1995) The dynamics of organizational development and change: how the past shapes the present and constrains the future. Organ Sci 6(1):9–18
Kremser W, Schreyögg G (2016) The dynamics of interrelated routines: introducing the cluster level. Organ Sci 27(3):698–721
Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manag Rev 24(4):691–710
Lazaric N (2008) 10 Routines and routinization: an exploration of some micro-cognitive foundations. Handbook of organizational routines 205
Lazaric N (2011) Organizational routines and cognition: an introduction to empirical and analytical contributions. J Inst Econ 7(2):147–156
Lazaric N, Denis B (2005) Routinisation and memorisation of tasks within a workshop: the case of the introduction of ISO norms. Ind Corp Chang 14(5):873–896
Lazaric N, Raybaut A (2005) Knowledge, hierarchy and the selection of routines: an interpretative model with group interactions. J Evol Econ 15(4):393–421
Lazaric N, Mangolte PA, Massué ML (2003) Articulation and codification of collective know-how in the steel industry: evidence from blast furnace control in France. Res Policy 32(10):1829–1847
Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ Sci 1(3):248–266
March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87
Marshall N., Tsekouras G. and Maron A. (2010). Creating routines for innovation: insight from an organizational experiment. Presented at the 5th International Conference on organizational knowledge, learning and capabilities. Boston, USA, 3-6 June, 19p
Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass
Nelson R, Winter S (2002) Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2):23–46.
Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J (2011) Routines revisited: exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad Manag Ann 5(1):413–453
Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Sharpe, New York
Pentland BT (1999) Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation. Acad Manag Rev 24(4):711–724
Polanyi M (2015) Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press
Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ Sci 20(4):685–695
Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. Acad Manag J 54:577–610
Schindehutte M, Morris MH (2009) Advancing strategic entrepreneurship research: the role of complexity science in shifting the paradigm. Enterp Theory Pract 33(1):241–276
Schumpeter JA (2008) The theory of economic development, 1934. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
Sharma P, Chrisman J (1999) Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Spring 1999:11–27
Sørensen JB, Stuart TE (2000) Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Adm Sci Q 45(1):81–112
Taylor A, Helfat CE (2009) Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organ Sci 20(4):718–739
Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28(13):1319–1350
Winter SG (2006) Toward a neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm. Ind Corp Chang 15(1):125–141
Winter SG (2013) Habit, deliberation, and action: strengthening the microfoundations of routines and capabilities. Acad Manag Perspect 27(2):120–137
Winter SG, Szulanski G (2001) Replication as strategy. Organ Sci 12(6):730–743
Witt U (2011) Emergence and functionality of organizational routines: an individualistic approach. J Inst Econ 7(02):157–174
Yin RK (1984) Applied social research methods series. Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, London
Zahra AS, Randerson K, Fayolle A (2013) Corporate entrepreneurship: where are we? Where can we go from here? M@n@gement 16(4):357–361
Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: a longitudinal study of price adjustment routines. Organ Sci 21(5):955–972
Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13:339–351
Funding
This study was funded with a grant from la Chaire transversale de recherche en entrepreneuriat et innovation de la Chambre de Commerce et d’Industrie de Paris (granted 24 November 2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Annex 1
Annex 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheldon, R.C., Laviolette, E.M. & de Geuser, F. Explaining the process and effects of new routine introduction with a notion of micro-level entrepreneurship. J Evol Econ 30, 609–642 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00655-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00655-6