Skip to main content
Log in

(In)determinacy, increasing returns, and the optimality of the Friedman rule in an endogenously growing open economy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper sets up a monetary endogenous growth model with Benhabib–Farmer production externalities for an open economy, and then uses it to investigate the possibility of indeterminacy. Moreover, the paper examines how the monetary authorities will set its optimal anchor of the money growth rate from the viewpoint of welfare maximization. Several main findings emerge from the analysis. First, when investment does not involve adjustment costs, the monetary equilibrium is locally determinate regardless of the strength of the labor externality and the extent of world capital market imperfections. Second, in the presence of investment adjustment costs, the monetary equilibrium may exhibit indeterminacy when the aggregate increasing returns-to-scale in production is sufficiently strong. Third, in the presence of world capital market imperfections, the Friedman rule of a zero nominal interest rate fails to be optimal. Fourth, in the face of perfect world capital markets, the optimal nominal money growth rate is maintained at the rate that is conformable to the Friedman rule, regardless of whether investment involves adjustment costs or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel A.B., Blanchard O.J.: An intertemporal model of saving and investment. Econometrica 51, 673–692 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arseneau D.M.: The inflation tax in an open economy with imperfect competition. Rev Econ Dyn 10, 126–147 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib J., Farmer R.E.A.: Indeterminacy and increasing returns. J Econ Theory 63, 19–41 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib J., Farmer R.E.A.: Indeterminacy and sector-specific externalities. J Monet Econ 37, 421–444 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buiter W.H.: Saddlepoint problems in continuous time rational expectations models: A general method and some macroeconomic examples. Econometrica 52, 665–680 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister E.: On some conceptual issues in rational expectations modeling. J Money Credit Bank 12, 800–816 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley T.F., Quadrini V.: Common currencies vs. monetary independence. Rev Econ Stud 70, 785–806 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia I., Teles P.: The optimal inflation tax. Rev Econ Dyn 2, 325–346 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha A.B.: The optimality of the Friedman rule when some distorting taxes are exogenous. Econ Theory 35, 267–291 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards S.: LDC foreign borrowing and default risk: An empirical investigation, 1976–1980. Am Econ Rev 74, 726–734 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eicher T.S., Turnovsky S.J., Walz U.: Optimal policy for financial market liberalizations: Decentralization and capital flow reversals. German Econ Rev 1, 19–42 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer R.E.A., Guo J.T.: Real business cycles and the animal spirits hypothesis. J Econ Theory 63, 42–73 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feichtinger G., Kort P.M., Hartl R.F., Wirl F.: The dynamics of a simple relative adjustment cost framework. German Econ Rev 2, 255–268 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M.: The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Macmillan, London (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidotti P.E., Vegh C.A.: The optimal inflation tax when money reduces transactions costs: A reconsideration. J Monet Econ 31, 189–205 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J.T., Lansing K.J.: Indeterminacy and stabilization policy. J Econ Theory 82, 481–490 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi F.: Tobin’s marginal and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50, 213–224 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho W.M., Zeng J., Zhang J.: Inflation taxation and welfare with externalities and leisure. J Money Credit Bank 39, 105–131 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Itaya J.I., Mino K.: Inflation, transaction costs and indeterminacy in monetary economies with endogenous growth. Economica 70, 451–470 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland P.N.: Implementing the Friedman rule. Rev Econ Dyn 6, 120–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri A.: Growth and equilibrium indeterminacy: The role of capital mobility. Econ Theory 17, 197–208 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q., Velasco A.: Indeterminacy in a small open economy with endogenous labor supply. Econ Theory 22, 661–669 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q., Velasco A.: Market imperfections and the instability of open economies. J Int Econ 64, 503–519 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P.M.: Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94, 1002–1037 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw M.F., Lai C.C., Chang W.Y.: Anticipated policy and endogenous growth in a small open monetary economy. J Int Money Finance 24, 719–743 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suen M.H., Yip C.K.: Superneutrality, indeterminacy and endogenous growth. J Macroeconomics 27, 579–595 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnovsky S.J.: Fiscal policy, growth, and macroeconomic performance in a small open economy. J Int Econ 40, 41–66 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnovsky S.J.: Equilibrium growth in a small economy facing an imperfect world capital market. Rev Dev Econ 1, 1–22 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnovsky S.J.: Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weder M.: Indeterminacy in the small open economy Ramsey growth model. J Econ Theory 98, 339–356 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Y.: Capacity utilization under increasing returns to scale. J Econ Theory 81, 7–36 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J.: Inflation and growth: pecuniary transactions costs and qualitative equivalence. J Money Credit Bank 32, 1–12 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-chong Lai.

Additional information

We are deeply grateful to Jang-Ting Guo, Ping Wang, an anonymous referee, and a co-editor, Stephen D. Williamson for their insightful comments that substantially improved the paper. We would also like to thank Fu-Sheng Hung, Chih-Hsing Liao, and Hsueh-fang Tsai for their helpful suggestions in relation to a previous version of this article. Financial support from the National Science Council of Taiwan, under grant NSC 96-2752-H-001-002-PAE, is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lai, Cc., Chin, Ct. (In)determinacy, increasing returns, and the optimality of the Friedman rule in an endogenously growing open economy. Econ Theory 44, 69–100 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0457-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0457-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation