Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Informational efficiency with ambiguous information

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proves the existence of fully revealing rational expectations equilibria for almost all sets of beliefs when investors are ambiguity averse and have preferences that are characterized by Choquet expected utility with a convex capacity. The result implies that strong-form efficient equilibrium prices exist even when many investors in the market make use of information in a way that is substantially different from traditional models of financial markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen B.: Generic existence of completely revealing equilibria for economies with uncertainty when prices convey information. Econometrica 49, 1173–1199 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen B.: Strict rational expectations equilibria with diffuseness. J Econ Theory 27, 20–46 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B., Jordan, J.S.: The existence of rational expectations equilibrium: a retrospective. In: Majumdar M (ed) Organizations with incomplete information: essays in economic analysis. Cambridge University Press, also available as Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 252 (1998)

  • Anscombe F., Aumann R.: A definition of subjective probability. Ann Math Stat 34, 199–205 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao H.H., Wang T., Zhang H.H.: Model uncertainty, limited market participation, and asset prices. Rev Financ Stud 18(4), 1219–1251 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caskey J.A.: Information in equity markets with ambiguity-averse investors. Rev Financial Stud 22, 3595–3627 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateauneuf A., Dana R.A., Tallon J.M.: Optimal risk-sharing rules and equilibria with choquet- expected-utility. J Math Econ 34, 191–214 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z., Epstein L.: Ambiguity, risk, and asset returns in continuous time. Econometrica 70(4), 1403–1443 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke F.H.: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. Wiley-Interscience, London (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Condie, S., Ganguli, J.V.: Ambiguity and rational expectations equilibria. Rev Econ Stud (2010, forthcoming)

  • Dana R.A.: Ambiguity, uncertainty aversion, and equilibrium welfare. Econ Theory 23, 569–587 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel K., Titman S.: Market reactions to tangible and intangible information. J Finance 61(4), 1605–1643 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, L., Pesce, M., Yannelis, N.: Core and equilibria under ambiguity. Econ Theory (2010a, forthcoming)

  • de Castro L., Pesce M., Yannelis N.: A New Perspective to Rational Expectations: Maximin Rational Expectations Equilibrium, Mimeo. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow J., da Costa Werlang S.R.: Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of portfolio. Econometrica 60(1), 197–204 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D., O’Hara M.: Regulation and return: the role of ambiguity aversion. Rev Financial Stud 22, 1817–1843 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75, 643–669 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L., Schneider M.: Ambiguity, information quality and asset pricing. J Finance 63, 197–228 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. Schneider, M.: Ambiguity and Asset Markets, Mimeo (2010)

  • Epstein L.G.: A definition of uncertainty aversion. Rev Econ Stud 66(3), 579–608 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L.G., Miao J.: A two-person dynamic equilibrium under ambiguity. J Econ Dyn Control 27(7), 1253–1288 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E.F.: Efficient capital markets: Ii. J Finance 46(5), 1575–1617 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardato P., Marinacci M.: Ambiguity made precise: A comparative foundation. J Econ Theory 102(2), 251–289 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D.: Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J Math Econ 18, 141–153 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S.: Further results on the informational efficiency of competitive stock markets. J Econ Theory 18(1), 81–101 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S.J., Stiglitz J.E.: On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. Am Econ Rev 70(3), 393–408 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan J.S.: On the efficient markets hypothesis. Econometrica 51(5), 1325–1343 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes J.M.: A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan, New Delhi (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight F.: Risk, Ambiguity, and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maenhout P.J.: Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing. Rev Financ Stud 17(4), 951–983 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A., Sangiorgi, F.: Ambiguity, Information Acquisition, and Price Swings in Asset Markets, Mimeo (2009)

  • Mukerji S., Tallon J.M.: Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of financial markets. Rev Econ Stud 68(4), 883–904 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji S., Tallon J.M.: Ambiguity aversion and the absence of indexed debt. Econ Theory 27(3), 665–685 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji S., Tallon J.M.: Ambiguity aversion and the absence of wage indexation. J Monet Econ 51(3), 653–670 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozsoylev, H., Werner, J.: Liquidity and asset prices in rational expectations equilibrium with ambiguous information. Econ Theory (2010, forthcoming)

  • Radner R.: Competitive equilibrium under uncertainty. Econometrica 36(3), 31–58 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner R.: Rational expectations equilibrium: generic existence and the information revealed by prices. Econometrica 47(3), 655–678 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigotti, L., Shannon, C.: Sharing Risk and Ambiguity, Mimeo (2008)

  • Savage L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, London (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57, 571–587 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siniscalchi M.: A behavioral characterization of plausible priors. J Econ Theory 128, 91–135 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallon J.M.: Assymetric information, nonadditive expected utility, and the information revealed by prices: an example. Int Econ Rev 39, 329–342 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ui, T.: The ambiguity premium versus the risk premium under limited market participation. Rev Finance (2010, forthcoming)

  • Uppal R., Wang T.: Model misspecification and underdiversification. J Finance 58(6), 2437–2464 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA

    Scott Condie

  2. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Jayant V. Ganguli

Authors
  1. Scott Condie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jayant V. Ganguli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Condie.

Additional information

We are grateful to Alain Chateauneuf, Ani Guerdjikova, Paolo Siconolfi and Jean-Marc Tallon for helpful comments. We are particularly grateful to an anonymous referee as well as Mark Machina, Klaus Ritzberger, and Nicholas Yannelis as editors of this special issue in honor of Daniel Ellsberg. Finally, we are grateful to Larry Blume and David Easley for advice and suggestions. We also thank several seminar and conference audiences for helpful discussion. Condie acknowledges support from the Solomon Fund for Decision Research at Cornell University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Condie, S., Ganguli, J.V. Informational efficiency with ambiguous information. Econ Theory 48, 229–242 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0646-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0646-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation