Skip to main content
Log in

The limb-specific embodiment of a tool following experience

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the incorporation of tools into the human body schema. Previous research on tool use suggests that through physical interaction with a tool, the representation of the body is adjusted to incorporate or “embody” the tool. The present experiment was conducted to test the limb-specific nature of tool embodiment. Participants were presented with images of a person holding a rake and executed hand- and foot-press responses to colored targets superimposed on the hand, foot, and rake of the image. This task was completed before and after moving a ball around a course with a hand-held rake. Consistent with previous research, a body-part compatibility effect emerged—response times (RTs) were shorter when the responding limb and target location were compatible (e.g., hand responses to targets on the hand) than when they were incompatible (e.g., hand responses to targets on the foot). Of greater theoretical relevance, hand RTs to targets presented on the hand were shorter than those to targets on the rake prior to experience, but were not different after completing the rake task. The post-experience similarity in hand RTs emerged because there was a significant reduction in RTs to targets on the rake following use. There was no significant pre-/post-experience change in hand RTs to targets on the hand or, importantly, for any response executed by the foot. These results provide new evidence that a tool is embodied in a limb-specific manner and is represented within the body schema as if it was an extension of the limb.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach P, Peatfield A, Tipper S (2007) Focusing on body sites: the role of spatial attention in action perception. Exp Brain Res 178:509–517

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berti A, Frassinetti F (2000) When far becomes near: re-mapping of space by tool use. J Cogn Neurosci 12:415–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonifazi S, Farnè A, Rinaldesi L, Làdavas E (2007) Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space through tool use: spatial extension or shift of the multi-sensory area. J Neuropsychol 1:101–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois J, Farnè A, Coello Y (2014) Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychol 148:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catmur C, Heyes C (2011) Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. J Exp Psychol Hum 37:409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby C (1998) Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex. Neuron 20:15–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • di Pellegrino G, Làdavas E, Farnè A (1997) Seeing where your hands are. Nature 338:730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing PE, Jiang YH, Shuman M, Kanwisher N (2001) A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293:2470–2473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farnè A, Làdavas E (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peri-personal space following tool use. NeuroReport 11:1645–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farnè A, Iriki A, Làdavas E (2005) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with crossmodal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43:238–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farnè A, Serino A, Làdavas E (2007) Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space following tool use: determinants and spatial characteristics revealed through cross-modal extinction. Cortex 43:436–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano M, Gross C (1993) A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp Brain Res 97:96–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano M, Gross C, Yap G (1994) Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science 266:1054–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imamizu H, Pütz B, Yoshioka T, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, Kawato M, Mivauchi S (2000) Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403:192–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport 7:2325–2330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kao K, Goodale M (2009) Enhanced detection of visual targets on the hand and familiar tools. Neuropsychologia 47:2454–2463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maravita A, Iriki A (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 8:79–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 35:580–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazalek A, Welsh TN, Nitsche M, Reid C, Clifton P, Leighton F, Tan K (2013) Reach across the boundary: evidence of physical tool appropriation following virtual practice. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (TEI ‘13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 155–158

  • Peelen MV, Downing PE (2007) The neural basis of visual body perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:636–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rademaker RL, Wu D, Bloem IM, Sack AT (2014) Intensive tool-practice and skillfulness facilitate the extension of body representations in humans. Neuropsychologia 56:196–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed C, Grubb J, Steele C (2006) Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. J Exp Psychol Hum 32:166–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M (1998) The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106:283–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas R, Press C, Haggard P (2006) Shared representations in body perception. Acta Psychol 121:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasino B, Weiss PH, Fink GR (2012) Imagined tool-use in near and far space modulates the extra-striate body area. Neuropsychologia 50:2467–2476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallesi A, Mapelli D, Schiff S, Amodio P, Umiltà C (2005) Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? Cognition 96:B33–B43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh TN, McDougall L, Paulson SD (2014) The personification of animals and the “animalization” of humans: initial insights into cross-species body and action representation. Cognition 132:398–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggett A, Hudson M, Tipper SP, Downing PE (2011) Learning associations between action and perception: effects of incompatible training on body part and spatial priming. Brain Cogn 76:87–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggett A, Downing PE, Tipper SP (2013) Facilitation and interference in spatial and body reference frames. Exp Brain Res 225:119–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Canada Research Chair program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberley Jovanov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jovanov, K., Clifton, P., Mazalek, A. et al. The limb-specific embodiment of a tool following experience. Exp Brain Res 233, 2685–2694 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4342-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4342-5

Keywords

Navigation