Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomical differences in the structural elements of fluid passage of Scots pine sapwood with contrasting treatability

  • Original
  • Published:
Wood Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatability of wood is a function of anatomical properties developed under certain growing conditions. While Scots pine sapwood material normally is considered as easy to impregnate, great variations in treatability can be observed. In order to study anatomical differences in the structural elements of transverse fluid passage, wood material with contrasting treatability has been compared. Ray composition and resin canal network, membrane areas of fenestriform pits in the cross-field as well as dimension and properties of bordered pits were investigated. The results showed large anatomical differences between the two contrasting treatability groups. Refractory Scots pine sapwood samples developed more rays per mm2 tangential section, while they were on average lower in cell numbers than rays found in easily treatable material. Easily treatable material had more parenchyma cells in rays than refractory material. At the same time, a larger membrane area in fenestriform pits in the cross-field was observed in the easily treatable sample fraction. Differences in the composition of resin canal network were not observed. Refractory samples developed on average smaller bordered pit features, with relatively small formed pit apertures compared to the easily treatable samples. In refractory Scots pine sapwood material, the structural elements of fluid passage such as bordered pit dimensions, fenestriform pits in the cross-field and parenchyma cells were altogether developed in smaller dimensions or number. Wood samples from better growing conditions and sufficient water supply showed a better treatability in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed SA, Sehlstedt-Persson M, Karlsson O, Morén T (2012) Uneven distribution of preservative in kiln-dried sapwood lumber of Scots pine: impact of wood structure and resin allocation. Holzforschung 66(2):251–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antonova GF, Stasova VV (1993) Effects of environmental factors on wood formation in Scots Pine stems. Trees Struct Funct 7(4):214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balatinecz JJ, Kennedy RV (1967) Maturation of ray parenchyma cells in Pine. Forest Prod J 17(10):57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamber RK (1973) The formation and permeability of interstitial spaces in the sapwood of some pinus species. J Inst Wood Sci 6(2):36–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks WB (1970) Some factors affecting the permeability of Scots Pine and Norway Spruce. J Inst Wood Sci 5(25):10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard DM, Lachenbruch B, McCulloh KA, Kitin P, Meinzer FC (2013) Do ray cells provide a pathway for radial water movement in the stems of conifer trees? Am J Bot 100:322–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauch J, Liese W, Willeitner H (1983) Zum Tränkverhalten verschiedener Kiefernarten. Holz Roh Werkst 41(8):339–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger F (1997) Effects of drought and phenology on GPP in Pinus sylvestris: a simulation study along a geographical gradient. Funct Ecol 11(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown FBH (1915) Variation in the size of ray pits in conifers. Ohio Nat 15(8):542–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Buro A, Buro E-A (1959a) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Eindringwege für Flüssigkeiten in Kiefernholz. Holzforschung 3:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buro A, Buro E-A (1959b) Untersuchungen über die Durchlässigkeit von Kiefernholz. Holz Roh Werkst 17(12):461–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté WA (1963) Structural factors affecting the permeability of wood. J Poly Sci Part C Poly Symp 2(1):231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domec JC, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC (2006) Bordered pit structure and function determine spatial patterns of air-seeding thresholds in xylem of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii; Pinaceae) trees. Am J Bot 93:1588–1600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domec JC, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC, Woodruff DR, Warren JM, McCulloh KA (2008) Maximum height in a conifer is associated with conflicting requirements for xylem design. PNAS 105(33):12069–12074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EN350-2 (1994) Durability of wood and wood-based products. Natural durability of solid wood. Guide to natural durability and treatability of selected wood species of importance in Europe. European Norm

  • Flynn KA (1995) A review of the permeability, fluid-flow, and anatomy of Spruce (Picea spp.). Wood Fiber Sci 27(3):278–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner BL, Meinzer FC (2005) Structure–function relationships in sapwood water transport and storage. In: Zwieniecki M, Holbrook NM (eds) Vascular transport in plants. Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, pp 307–332

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kitin P, Fujii T, Abe H, Takata K (2009) Anatomical features that facilitate radial flow across growth rings and from xylem to cambium in Cryptomeria japonica. Ann Bot 103(7):1145–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lande S, Høibø O, Larnøy E (2010) Variation in treatability of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) by the chemical modification agent furfuryl alcohol dissolved in water. Wood Sci Technol 44(1):105–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larnøy E, Lande S, Vestøl GI (2008) Variations of Furfuryl alcohol and Wolmanit CX-8 treatability of pine sapwood within and between trees. Paper presented at the International Research Group on Wood Protection, Istanbul, Turkey, 25–29 May 2008

  • Liese W, Fahnenbrock M (1952) Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen über den Bau der Hoftüpfel. Holz Roh Werkst 10(5):197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JA, Esteban LG, de Palacios P, Fernandez FG (2010) Variation in wood anatomical traits of Pinus sylvestris L. between Spanish regions of provenance. Trees Struct Funct 24(6):1017–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Vilalta J, Cochard H, Mencuccini M, Sterck F, Herrero A, Korhonen JFJ, Llorens P, Nikinmaa E, Nolè A, Poyatos R, Ripullone F, Sass-Klaassen U, Zweifel R (2009) Hydraulic adjustment of Scots pine across Europe. New Phytol 184(2):353–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mátyás C, Ackzell L, Samuel CJA (2004) EUFORGEN technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Int Plant Genet Resour Inst, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson T, Megnis M, Varna J, Lindberg H (2001a) Measurement of the uptake of linseed oil in pine by the use of an X-ray microdensitometry technique. J Wood Sci 47(4):275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson T, Megnis M, Varna J, Lindberg H (2001b) Study of the transverse liquid flow paths in pine and spruce using scanning electron microscopy. J Wood Sci 47(4):282–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallardy SG (2008) Physiology of woody plants, 3rd edn. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips EWJ (1933) Movement of the pit membrane in coniferous woods, with special reference to preservative treatment. Forestry 7(2):109–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poyatos R, Martinez-Vilalta J, Cermak J, Ceulemans R, Granier A, Irvine J, Kostner B, Lagergren F, Meiresonne L, Nadezhdina N, Zimmermann R, Llorens P, Mencuccini M (2007) Plasticity in hydraulic architecture of Scots pine across Eurasia. Oecologia 153(2):245–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz G, Krause A, Militz H (2010) Exploratory study on the impregnation of Scots pine sapwood (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with different hot melting waxes. Wood Sci Technol 44(3):379–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sedighi-Gilani M, Griffa M, Mannes D, Lehmann E, Carmeliet J, Derome D (2012) Visualization and quantification of liquid water transport in softwood by means of neutron radiography. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55(21–22):6211–6221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamm AJ (1947) Passage of liquids, vapors and dissolved materials through softwoods. Technical bulletin, US Forest Products Laboratory 929

    Google Scholar 

  • Tondi G, Thevenon MF, Mies B, Standfest G, Petutschnigg A, Wieland S (2013) Impregnation of Scots pine and beech with tannin solutions: effect of viscosity and wood anatomy in wood infiltration. Wood Sci Technol 47(3):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenführ R (1989) Anatomie des Holzes, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Holztechnik. Fachbuchverlag, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenführ R (1999) Anatomie des Holzes: Strukturanalytik, Identifizierung, Nomenklatur. Mikrotechnologie, DRW-Verlag, Leinfelden-Echterdingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenführ R (2007) Holzatlas, 6th edn. Fachbuchverlag Leipzig, Carl Hanser Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop AB, Davies GW (1961) Morphological factors relating to the penetration of liquids into wood. Holzforschung 15(5):129–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yaman B (2007) Comparative wood anatomy of Pinus sylvestris and its var. compacta in the west Black Sea region of Turkey. IAWA J 28(1):75–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Northern Periphery Programme project “Developing the Scots pine Resource” for financial support within the sampling process. KAM’s participation in this project was funded by Grant IBN 09–19871 from the National Science Foundation, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrin Zimmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmer, K., Treu, A. & McCulloh, K.A. Anatomical differences in the structural elements of fluid passage of Scots pine sapwood with contrasting treatability. Wood Sci Technol 48, 435–447 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-014-0619-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-014-0619-2

Keywords

Navigation