Skip to main content
Log in

Cleaner shrimp are true cleaners of injured fish

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reef fishes sustain injuries from various behavioural and environmental interactions. Injured fishes have been observed frequenting cleaning stations to be attended by different cleaner fishes. This symbiotic relationship between injured fishes and cleaner fishes has only been observed in the wild and has never been demonstrated empirically for cleaner shrimp. We present the first investigation of cleaning of injured fish by cleaner shrimp, and the first controlled laboratory trial investigating the functional relationship between injured client fish and cleaners. We tested whether the cleaner shrimp (Lysmata amboinensis) cleaned injured sea goldies (Pseudanthias squamipinnis) following a standardised, unilateral superficial skin lesion. We recorded the cleaning behaviour between shrimp and fish and determined that the fish regulated the cleaning and reduced the amount of cleaning time by the shrimp of the injured side immediately post-injury, corresponding with previous literary evidence of the rapid onset of re-epithelialisation of the injury to seal it in the first 24 h in injured fishes. Thereafter, injured fish showed no cleaning preference between injured and uninjured sides. Image analyses determined that the cleaner shrimp reduced the redness of the injury, representing rubor, associated with the inflammatory response in fishes. Injuries in fishes are susceptible to invasion by secondary pathogens, and the reduction of injury rubor by shrimp may suggest that cleaning by these shrimp could reduce the success of opportunistic infection. Cleaner shrimp neither aggravated existing injury, nor created additional injury, measured quantitatively. The cleaning of injured fish by cleaner shrimp thus likely involves true cleaning behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnal C, Morand S (2001) Importance of ectoparasites and mucus in cleaning interactions in the Mediterranean cleaner wrasse Symphodus melanocercus. Mar Biol 138:777–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnal C, Côté IM, Morand S (2001) Why clean and be cleaned? The importance of client ectoparasites and mucus in a marine cleaning symbiosis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft 67:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker JHA, Grutter AS (2004) Cleaner shrimp do clean. Coral Reefs 23:515–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoncini AA, Machado LF, Barreiros JP, Hostim-Silva M, Verani JR (2009) Cleaning activity among Labridae in the Azores: the rainbow wrasse Coris julis and the Azorean blue wrasse Centrolabrus caeruleus. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 89:859–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böckelmann PK, Ochandio BS, Bechara IJ (2010) Histological study of the dynamics in epidermis regeneration of the carp tail fin (Cyprinus carpio, Linnaeus, 1758). Braz J Biol 70:217–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary R (2003) The cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus, is a key organism for reef fish diversity at Ras Mohammed national Park, Egypt. J Anim Ecol 72:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary R, Grutter AS (2002) Asymmetric cheating opportunities and partner control in the cleaner fish mutualism. Anim Behav 63:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary R, Grutter AS (2005) Punishment and partner switching cause cooperative behaviour in a cleaning mutualism. Biol Lett 1:396–399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary R, Oliviera RF, Oliviera TSF, Canário AVM (2007) Do cleaning organisms reduce the stress response of client reef fish? Front Zool. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-4-21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bunkley-Williams L, Williams EH Jr (1998) Ability of Pederson cleaner shrimp to remove juveniles of the parasitic cymothoid isopod, Anilocra haemuli, from the host. Crustaceana 71:862–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro R, Zou J, Secombes CJ, Martin SAM (2011) Cortisol modulates the induction of inflammatory gene expression in a rainbow trout macrophage cell line. Fish Shellfish Immunol 30:215–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis L, Bshary R (2009) Strategic adjustment of service quality to client identity in the cleaner shrimp, Periclimenes longicarpus. Anim Behav 78:455–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney KL, Côté IM (2005) Mutualism or parasitism? The variable outcome of cleaning symbioses. Biol Lett 1:162–165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Côté IM (2000) Evolution and ecology of cleaning symbioses in the sea. In: Gibson RN, Barnes M (eds) Oceanography and marine biology: an annual review, vol 38. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 311–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MW, Ottmar ML (2006) Wounding and reflex impairment may be predictors for mortality in discarded or escaped fish. Fish Res 82:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MW, Stephenson J, Noga EJ (2008) The effect of Tricaine on use of the fluorescein test for detecting skin and corneal ulcers in fish. J Aquat Anim Health 20:86–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckes M, Dove S, Siebeck UE, Grutter AS (2015) Fish mucus versus parasitic gnathiid isopods as sources of energy and sunscreens for a cleaner fish. Coral Reefs 34:823–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreire R, Bronstein JL, Rinaldi S, Law R, Gauduchon M (2001) Cheating and the evolutionary stability of mutualisms. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:773–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontenot DK, Neiffer DL (2004) Wound management in teleost fish: biology of the healing process, evaluation, and treatment. Vet Clin N Am Exot Anim Pract 7:57–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster SA (1985) Wound healing: a possible role of cleaning stations. Copeia 4:875–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francini-Filho RB, Moura RL, Sazima I (2000) Cleaning by the wrasse Thalassoma norohanum, with two records of predation by its grouper client Cephalopholis fulva. J Fish Biol 56:802–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorlick DL (1980) Ingestion of host fish surface mucus by the Hawaiian cleaning wrasse, Labroides phthirophagus (Labridae), and its effect on host species preference. Copeia 4:863–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grutter AS (1997) Effect of the removal of cleaner fish on the abundance and species composition of reef fish. Oecologia 11:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grutter AS (2001) Parasite infection rather than tactile stimulation is the proximate cause of cleaning behaviour in reef fish. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1361–1365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grutter AS, Bshary R (2003) Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:S242–S244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grutter AS, Murphy JM, Choat JH (2003) Cleaner fish drives local fish diversity on coral reefs. Curr Biol 13:64–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grutter AS, De Brauwer M, Bshary R, Cheney KL, Cribb TH, Madin EMP, McClure EC, Meekan MG, Sun D, Warner RR, Werminghausen J, Sikkel P (2018) Parasite infestation increases on coral reefs without cleaner fish. Coral Reefs 37:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE Jr (2017) Hmisc: harrell miscellaneous. R package version 4.0-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc (with contributions from Charles Dupont and many others). Accessed 20 Sept 2017

  • Hobson ES (1971) Cleaning symbiosis among California inshore fishes. Fish Bull 69:491–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutson KS, Brazenor AK, Vaughan DB, Trujillo-Gonzalez A (2018) Monogenean parasite cultures: current techniques and recent advances. Adv Parasitol. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2018.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iger Y, Balm PHM, Jenner HA, Wendelaar Bonga SE (1995) Cortisol induced stress-related changes in the skin of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Gen Comp Endocrinol 97:188–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen LB, Wahli T, McGurk C, Eriksen TB, Obach A, Waagbø R, Handler A, Tafalla C (2015) Effect of temperature and diet on wound healing in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Fish Physiol Biochem 41:1527–1543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko JJ II, Yamada R, Brock JA, Nakamura RM (1988) Infection of tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus (Trewavas), by a marine monogenean, Neobenedenia melleni (MacCallum, 1927) Yamaguti, 1963 in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, USA, and its treatment. J Fish Dis 11:295–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolm N, Hoffman EA, Olsson J, Berglund A, Jones AG (2005) Group stability and homing behaviour but no kin group structure in a coral reef fish. Behav Ecol 16:521–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limbaugh C (1961) Cleaning symbiosis. Sci Am 205:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey GS, Balazs GH, Privitera LA (1994) Cleaning symbiosis between the wrasse, Thalassoma duperrey, and the green turtle, Chelonia mydas. Copeia 3:684–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcusso PF, Yunis J, Claudiano GS, Manrique WG, Salvador R, de Moraes JRE, Moraes FR (2014) Sodium fluorescein for early detection of skin ulcers in Aeromonas hydrophila infected Piaractus mesopotamicus. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol 34:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  • McCammon AM, Sikkel P, Nemeth D (2010) Effects of three Caribbean cleaner shrimps on ectoparasitic monogeneans in a semi-natural environment. Coral Reefs 29:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Militz TA, Hutson KS (2015) Beyond symbiosis: cleaner shrimp clean up in culture. PLoS One 10(2):e0117723

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neiffer DL, Stamper MA (2009) Fish sedation, anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia: considerations, methods, and types of drugs. ILAR J 50:343–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noga EJ, Udomkusonri P (2002) Fluorescein: a rapid, sensitive, nonlethal method for detecting skin ulceration in fish. Vet Pathol 39:726–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oates J, Manica A, Bshary R (2010) Roving and service quality in the cleaner wrasse Labroides bicolor. Ethology 116:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östlund-Nilsson S, Becker JHA, Nilsson GE (2005) Shrimps remove ectoparasites from fishes in temperate waters. Biol Lett 1:454–456

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Penning MR, Vaughan DB, Fivas K, McEwan T (2017) Chemical immobilization of elasmobranchs at uShaka Sea World, Durban, South Africa. In: Smith M, Warmolts D, Thoney D, Heuter R, Murray M, Ezcurra J (eds) The elasmobranch husbandry manual II: recent advances in the care of sharks, rays and their relatives. Special Publication of the Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio, pp 331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Purivirojkul W (2012) Histological changes of aquatic animals by parasitic infection. In: Martinez EP (ed) Histopathology—reviews and recent advances. InTech publishers, London, pp 153–176

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 Sept 2017

  • Roberts RJ (2012) Fish pathology, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde K (2005) Marine parasitology. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sazima I, Grossman A, Sazima C (2004) Hawksbill turtles visit moustached barbers: cleaning symbiosis between Eretmochelys imbricata and the shrimp Stenopus hispidus. Biota Neotrop 4:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sazima C, Grossman A, Sazima I (2010) Turtle cleaners: reef fishes foraging on epibionts of sea turtles in the tropical Southwestern Atlantic, with a summary of this association type. Neotrop Ichthyol 8:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sazima C, Jordano P, Guimarães PR Jr, Dos Reis SF, Sazima I (2012) Cleaning associations between birds and herbivorous mammals in Brazil: structure and complexity. Auk 129:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro DY (1988) Variation of group composition and spatial structure with group size in a sex-changing fish. Anim Behav 36:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard KL (1994) Functions of fish mucus. Rev Fish Biol Fish 4:401–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikkel PC, Cheney KL, Côté IM (2004) In situ evidence for ectoparasites as a proximate cause of cleaning interactions in reef fish. Anim Behav 68:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares MC, Bshary R, Cardoso SC, Côté IM (2008) The meaning of jolts by fish clients of cleaning gobies. Ethology 114:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares MC, Oliviera RF, Ros AFH, Grutter AS, Bshary R (2011) Tactile stimulation lowers stress in fish. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Cheney KL, Werminghausen J, Meekan MG, McCormick MI, Cribb TH, Grutter AS (2015) Presence of cleaner wrasse increases the recruitment of damselfishes to coral reefs. Biol Lett 11:20150456

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Titus BM, Daly M, Exton DA (2015) Temporal patterns of Pederson shrimp (Ancylomenes pedersoni Chace 1958) cleaning interactions on Caribbean coral reefs. Mar Biol 162:1651–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titus BM, Vondriska C, Daly M (2017) Comparative behavioural observations demonstrate the ‘cleaner’ shrimp Periclimenes yucatanicus engages in true symbiotic cleaning interactions. R Soc Open Sci 4:170078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan DB, Penning MR, Christison KW (2008) 2-Phenoxyethanol as anaesthetic in removing and relocating 102 species of fishes representing 30 families from Sea World to uShaka Marine World, South Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 75:189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan DB, Grutter AS, Costello MJ, Hutson K (2016) Cleaner fishes and shrimp diversity and a re-evaluation of cleaning symbioses. Fish Fish. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldie PA, Blomberg SP, Cheney KL, Goldizen AW, Grutter AS (2011) Long-term effects of the cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus on coral reef fish communities. PLoS One 6:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh WJ (1983) Stability of a coral reef fish community following a catastrophic storm. Coral Reefs 2:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks P (2000) Red-billed oxpeckers: vampires or tickbirds? Behav Ecol 11:154–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler B, Torchiano M (2016) lmPerm: Permutation tests for linear models. R package version 2.1.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmPerm. Accessed 20 Sept 2017

  • Whiteman EA, Côté IM (2002) Cleaning activity of two Caribbean cleaning gobies: intra- and interspecific comparisons. J Fish Biol 60:1443–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

DBV was funded through an IPRS (Australian government) scholarship awarded by James Cook University, Townsville, Australia. We are grateful to Cairns Marine, Cairns, Australia, and in particular to Laura Simmons for the ongoing support for our investigations into cleaning symbiosis. We acknowledge the generous assistance of volunteers Alejandro Trujillo González, Thienthanh Trinh, Julian Wilson, and Pauline Narvaez. We thank Peter Waldie and an undisclosed reviewer for their insightful comments and suggestions that ultimately strengthened the manuscript. This paper is dedicated in memoriam to Patrick Donnelly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Vaughan.

Ethics declarations

Statement on the welfare of animals

All applicable international, national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Animal housing was inspected by the James Cook University welfare officer, and ethics approval was granted prior to commencement of this study under the James Cook University Ethics Committee Permit number A2260, conforming strictly to the national regulations set out in the National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, 8th edition, under Section 39 of the National Health and Medical Research Council Act, 1992. A superficial, standardised epithelial injury was necessary to answer the research question. Fish were given a single unilateral superficial injury by removal of scales from a predetermined area on either flank of an area no larger than 0.15 cm2. All fish were housed separately to avoid bullying. Handling of all fish briefly with an aquarium hand-held net was crucial for the transferral into and out of the experimental tanks and could not be avoided. Hand-netting was kept to the operational minimum, occurring only once per day in and out of the experimental tanks per individual. Fish were offered food daily after experimentation and fed successfully, demonstrating a rapid return to normal behaviour after brief handling. Anaesthesia was justifiably employed to facilitate rapid photography of all fish and to avoid prolonged aerial exposure. Three fish mortalities occurred during the experimentation period employing 126 fish. All fish were humanely euthanised after sampling using an anaesthetic overdose of 2-phenoxyethanol (1.5 ml/l > 10 min; Neiffer and Stamper 2009) following the approved animal end-point set out in the animal ethics approval. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

All datasets used to generate the statistical analyses are available from https://doi.org/10.4225/28/5b2c885b32331.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: D. Goulet.

Reviewed by P. Waldie and an undisclosed expert.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaughan, D.B., Grutter, A.S., Ferguson, H.W. et al. Cleaner shrimp are true cleaners of injured fish. Mar Biol 165, 118 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3379-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3379-y

Navigation