Skip to main content
Log in

Anaerobic digestion of chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) sludge and the microbial community structure

  • Environmental biotechnology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness and treatment conditions of FeCl3- and AlCl3-coagulated municipal sewage sludge from chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) using anaerobic digestion (AD) and the structure of microbial community were investigated. The results based on 297 measurements under different operational conditions demonstrate good average AD performance of CEPT sludge, that is, percent volatile solid reduction of 58 %, specific biogas production (or biogas yield) of 0.92 m3/kg volatile solids (VS) destroyed, and methane content of 65.4 %. FeCl3 dosing, organic loading rate, temperature, and hydraulic retention time all significantly affected AD performance. FeCl3 dosing greatly improved specific methane production (methane yield) by 38–54 % and significantly reduced hydrogen sulfide (H2S) content in biogas (from up to 13,250 to <200 ppm), contributing to higher methane recovery and simplified biogas cleaning for power generation. Metagenomic analysis suggested that anaerobic digesters of both CEPT sludge and combined primary and secondary sludge were dominated by Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Thermotogae, and Chloroflexi. However, Methanomicrobia methanogens were better enriched in the anaerobic digesters of CEPT sludge than in the combined sludge. Further, different sources of CEPT sludge with various chemical properties nurtured shared and unique microbial community composition. Combined, this study supports AD as an efficient technology for CEPT sludge treatment and poses first insights into the microbial community structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolzonella D, Pavan P, Battistoni P, Cecchi F (2005) Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: influence of the solid retention time in the wastewater treatment process. Process Biochem 40(3):1453–1460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabirol N, Barragán E, Durán A, Noyola A (2003) Effect of aluminium and sulfate on anaerobic digestion of sludge from wastewater enhanced primary treatment. Water Sci Technol 48(6):235–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel B, Scherer P (2008) The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7(2):173–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federation WE, Association APH (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydar S, Aziz JA (2009) Characterization and treatability studies of tannery wastewater using chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT)—a case study of Saddiq leather works. J Hazard Mater 163(2):1076–1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hespell RB, Canale-Parola E (1971) Amino acid and glucose fermentation by Treponema denticola. Arch Mikrobiol 78(3):234–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ju F, Guo F, Ye L, Xia Y, Zhang T (2014) Metagenomic analysis on seasonal microbial variations of activated sludge from a full-scale wastewater treatment plant over 4 years. Environ Microbiol Rep 6(1):80–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ju F, Li B, Ma L, Wang Y, Huang D, Zhang T (2016) Antibiotic resistance genes and human bacterial pathogens: co-occurrence, removal, and enrichment in municipal sewage sludge digesters. Water Res 91:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ju F, Zhang T (2014) Novel microbial populations in ambient and mesophilic biogas-producing and phenol-degrading consortia unraveled by high-throughput sequencing. Microb Ecol 68(2):235–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-H, Kang H-J, Lee YH, Lee TJ, Han K, Choi Y, Park H-D (2012) Monitoring bacterial community structure and variability in time scale in full-scale anaerobic digesters. J Environ Monit 14(7):1893–1905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Ju F, Cai L, Zhang T (2015) Profile and fate of bacterial pathogens in sewage treatment plants revealed by high-throughput metagenomic approach. Environ Sci Technol 49(17):10492–10502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray BE (1990) The life and times of the enterococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev 3(1):46–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Noyola A, Tinajero A (2005) Effect of biological additives and micronutrients on the anaerobic digestion of physicochemical sludge. Water Sci Technol 52(1–2):275–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park CM, Novak JT (2013) The effect of direct addition of iron (III) on anaerobic digestion efficiency and odor causing compounds. Water Sci Technol 68(11):2391–2396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regueiro L, Veiga P, Figueroa M, Alonso-Gutierrez J, Stams AJ, Lema JM, Carballa M (2012) Relationship between microbial activity and microbial community structure in six full-scale anaerobic digesters. Microbiol Res 167(10):581–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandino J (2004) Chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) and its applicability for large wastewater treatment plants. IWA publishing

  • Sanin FD, Clarkson WW, Vesilind PA (2011) Sludge engineering: the treatment and disposal of wastewater sludges. DEStech Publications, Inc.

  • Sieber JR, McInerney MJ, Gunsalus RP (2012) Genomic insights into syntrophy: the paradigm for anaerobic metabolic cooperation. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:429–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg C, Al-Soud WA, Larsson M, Alm E, Yekta SS, Svensson BH, Sørensen SJ, Karlsson A (2013) 454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 85(3):612–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ünal B, Perry VR, Sheth M, Gomez-Alvarez V, Chin K-J, Nüsslein K (2012) Trace elements affect methanogenic activity and diversity in enrichments from subsurface coal bed produced water. Front Microbiol 3:375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanwonterghem I, Jensen PD, Dennis PG, Hugenholtz P, Rabaey K, Tyson GW (2014) Deterministic processes guide long-term synchronised population dynamics in replicate anaerobic digesters. ISME J 8(10):2015–2028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Werner JJ, Knights D, Garcia ML, Scalfone NB, Smith S, Yarasheski K, Cummings TA, Beers AR, Knight R, Angenent LT (2011) Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(10):4158–4163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xia Y, Cai L, Zhang T, Fang HH (2012) Effects of substrate loading and co-substrates on thermophilic anaerobic conversion of microcrystalline cellulose and microbial communities revealed using high-throughput sequencing. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(18):13652–13659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xia Y, Ju F, Fang HH, Zhang T (2013) Mining of novel thermo-stable cellulolytic genes from a thermophilic cellulose-degrading consortium by metagenomics. PLoS One 8(1):e53779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xia Y, Wang Y, Fang HH, Jin T, Zhong H, Zhang T (2014) Thermophilic microbial cellulose decomposition and methanogenesis pathways recharacterized by metatranscriptomic and metagenomic analysis. Sci Report 4:6708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Zhang D, Shan A, Yuan H, Huang X, Yuan W, Dai X, Zhu N (2015) Methane-rich biogas production from waste activated sludge with the addition of ferric chloride under thermophilic anaerobic digestion system. RSC Adv 5:38538–38546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Wang Q, Wang Z, Sahinkaya E, Li Y, Ma J, Wu Z (2014) Start-up of an anaerobic dynamic membrane digester for waste activated sludge digestion: temporal variations in microbial communities. PLoS One 9(4):e93710

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Collaborative Research Fund (CRF, C7044-14G) for financial support. Feng Ju and Yubo Wang would like to thank the University of Hong Kong (HKU) for the postgraduate scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 213 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ju, F., Wang, Y., Lau, F.T.K. et al. Anaerobic digestion of chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) sludge and the microbial community structure. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100, 8975–8982 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7730-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7730-2

Keywords

Navigation