Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gradient-recalled echo sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating the labrum

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of fat-suppressed gradient-recalled echo (GRE) compared with conventional spin echo T1-weighted (T1W) sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating labral tears.

Materials and methods

Three musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed MR arthrograms performed over a 12-month period for which surgical correlation was available. Of 180 serial arthrograms, 31 patients had surgery with a mean of 48 days following imaging. Paired coronal oblique and axial T1W or GRE sequences were analyzed by consensus for labral tear (coronal oblique two-dimensional multi-echo data image combination, 2D MEDIC; and axial three-dimensional double-echo steady-state, 3D DESS; Siemens MAGNETOM Sonata 1.5-T MR system). Interpretations were correlated with operative reports.

Results

Of 31 shoulders, 25 had labral tears at surgery. The GRE sequences depicted labral tears in 22, while T1W images depicted tears in 16 (sensitivity 88% versus 64%; p < 0.05). Subdividing the labrum, GRE was significantly more sensitive for the posterior labrum (75% versus 25%; p < 0.05) with a trend toward greater sensitivity at the anterior labrum (78% versus 56%; p = 0.157) but not significantly different for the superior labrum (50% versus 57%; p > 0.7). Specificities were somewhat lower for GRE.

Conclusion

Thin section GRE sequences are more sensitive than T1W for the detection of anterior and posterior labral tears. As the specificity of GRE was lower, it should be considered as an adjunctive imaging sequence that may improve depiction of labral tears, particularly smaller tears, in routine MR arthrography protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaipat L, Palmer WE. Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25: 371–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jbara M, Chen Q, Marten P, Morcos M, Beltran J. Shoulder MR arthrography: how, why, when. Radiol Clin N Am 2005; 43: 683–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shankman S, Bencardino J, Beltran J. Glenohumeral instability: evaluation using MR arthrography of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiol 1999; 28: 365–382.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gusmer PB, Potter HG, Schatz JA, et al. Labral Injuries: accuracy of detection with unenhanced MR imaging of the shoulder. Radiology 1996; 200: 519–524.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett BM. On tests for equality of predictive values for t diagnostic procedures. Stat Med 1985; 4: 535–539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett BM. On comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a number of diagnostic procedures. Biometrics 1972; 28: 793–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandnani VP, Yeager TD, DeBerardino T, et al. Glenoid labral tears: prospective evaluation with MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 1229–1235.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, Karzel R, Del Pizzo W, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 155: 829–832.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1994; 190: 645–651.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer WE, Caslowitz PL. Anterior shoulder instability: diagnostic criteria determined from prospective analysis of 121 MR arthrograms. Radiology 1995; 197: 819–825.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Applegate GR, Hewitt M, Snyder SJ, Watson E, Kwak S, Resnick D. Chronic labral tears: value of magnetic resonance arthrography in evaluating the glenoid labrum and labral-bicipital complex. Arthroscopy 2004; 209: 959–963.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS, et al. Superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions: diagnosis with MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology 2000; 214: 267–271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jee WH, McCauley TR, Katz LD, Matheny JM, Ruwe PA, Daigneault JP. Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid labrum: reliability and accuracy of MR arthrography for diagnosis. Radiology 2001; 218: 127–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JHE, Van Raalte V, Malian V. Diagnosis of SLAP lesions with Grashey-view arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32: 388–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Waldt S, Burkart A, Lange P, Imhoff AB, Rummeny EJ, Woertler K. Diagnostic performance of MR arthrography in the assessment of superior labral anteroposterior lesions of the shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 1271–1278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Waldt S, Burkart A, Imhoff AB, Bruegel M, Rummeny EJ, Woertler K. Anterior shoulder instability: accuracy of MR arthrography in the classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous injuries. Radiology 2005; 237: 578–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahin G, Demirtas M. An overview of MR arthrography with emphasis on current technique and applicational hints and tips. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58: 416–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wutke R, Fellner FA, Fellner C, Stangl R, Dobritz M, Bautz WA. Direct MR arthrography of the shoulder: 2D vs. 3D gradient-echo imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19: 1183–1191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McCauley TR, Pope CF, Jokl P. Normal and abnormal glenoid labrum: assessment with multiplanar gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 183: 35–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Loredo R, Longo C, Salonen D, et al. Glenoid labrum: MR imaging with histologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196: 33–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gobezie R, Warner JJP. SLAP lesion: what is it...really? Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36: 379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank James Sayre, PhD for advice and assistance with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 165-59, Box 956952, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA

    Marc J. Lee, Kambiz Motamedi, Kira Chow & Leanne L. Seeger

Authors
  1. Marc J. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kambiz Motamedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kira Chow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leanne L. Seeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kambiz Motamedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, M.J., Motamedi, K., Chow, K. et al. Gradient-recalled echo sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating the labrum. Skeletal Radiol 37, 19–25 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0398-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0398-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation