Abstract
Theory suggests that there is a trade-off between mate attraction and investment in parental care. Yet, under some circumstances, such as in species with uniparental male care, it is conceivable that males who provide more care also attract more females, and hence avoid this cost. We tested these two alternative hypotheses using the Florida flagfish, Jordanella floridae, which is a highly sexually dimorphic species with male parental care. We predicted that if components of male care behavior primarily serve offspring survival, they should display these behaviors more in the presence of eggs than without eggs. We also predicted that males should show a trade-off between display, and other activities directed to other fish, and care behaviors. Alternatively, if care has a positive effect on mating success, we expected males to show care even in the absence of eggs, and that they should display more care in the presence of females. We found that care behavior mostly depended on the presence of eggs, males increased care when they guarded eggs, and there was a negative relationship between rates of interaction and care behavior. Most care was exhibited in the absence of other fish while the presence of males and females both had a negative effect on care behavior. There was no difference in care behavior with males or females present. Only nest-visitation rates were highest in the presence of females, suggesting that this behavior is used as part of the courtship. These results support the idea that male care in this species is primarily influenced by natural selection. Males did, however, display fanning and other egg-directed behaviors even in the absence of eggs. The level of these behaviors was constant and independent of display behavior. Hence, it seems that care may be used in mate attraction before the male has received his first clutches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Andersson M, Iwasa Y (1996) Sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 11:53–58
Assem J van den (1967) Territory in the three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus L. An experimental study in intra-specific competition. Behaviour 16 [Suppl]:1–164
Baylis JR (1981) The evolution of parental care in fishes, with reference to Darwin's rule of male sexual selection. Environ Biol Fish 6:223–251
Blumer LS (1979) Male parental care in the bony fishes. Q Rev Biol 54:149–161
Boschung HTJr, Williams JD, Gotshall DW, Caldwell MC, Caldwell DK (2000) The Audubon Society field guide to North American fishes, whales, and dolphins. Chanticleer, New York
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London
Fitzpatrick S, Berglund A, Rosenqvist G (1995) Ornaments or offspring: costs to reproductive success restrict sexual selection processes. Biol J Linn Soc 55:251–260
Foster NR, Cairns J Jr, Kaesler RL (1969) The flagfish, Jordanella floridae, as a laboratory animal for behavioral bioassay studies. Proc Natl Nat Sci Philadelphia 121:129–152
Gowaty PA (1997) Sexual dialectics, sexual selection and variation in reproductive behavior. In: Gowaty PA (ed) Feminism and evolutionary ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 21–52
Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) The evolution of male and female parental care in fishes. Am Zool 25:807–822
Hoelzer GA (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067–1107
Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A (1999) Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J Theor Biol 200:97–109
Jamieson IG (1995) Do female fish prefer to spawn in nests with eggs for reasons of mate choice copying or egg survival? Am Nat 145:824–832
Keenleyside MHA (1983) Mate desertion in relation to adult sex ratio in the biparental cichlid fish Herotilapia multispinosa. Anim Behav 31:683–688
Kirkpatrick M (1985) Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: the demise of the "sexy son". Am Nat 125:788–810
Kokko H (1998) Should advertising parental care be honest? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:1871–1878
Kraak SBM (1996) 'Copying mate choice': which phenomena deserve this term? Behav Proc 36:99–102
Magrath RD, Elgar MA (1997) Paternal care declines with increased opportunity for extra-pair matings in fairy martins. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264:1731–1736
Meddis R (1984) Statistics using ranks. A unified approach. Blackwell, Oxford
Mertz JC, Barlow GW (1966) On the reproductive behavior of Jordanella floridae (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae) with special reference to a quantitative analysis of parental fanning. Z Tierpsychol 23:537–554
Møller AP, Thornhill R (1998) Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Anim Behav 55:1507–1515
Price TD, Schluter D, Heckman NE (1993) Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol J Linn Soc 48:187–211
Rangeley RW, Godin J-GJ (1992) The effects of a trade-off between foraging and brood defense on parental behaviour in the convict cichlid fish, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Behaviour 120:123–138
Sargent RC, Gross MR (1993) William's principle: an explanation of parental care in teleost fishes. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) Behaviour of teleost fishes. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 333–361
Sevenster P (1961) A causal analysis of a displacement activity (fanning in Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour 9 [Suppl]:1–170
Smith WE (1973) A Cyprinodontid fish, Jordanella floridae, as a laboratory animal for rapid chronic bioassays. J Fish Res Board Can 30:329–330
St. Mary CM, Noureddine CG, Lindström K (2001) Environmental effects on male reproductive success and parental care in the Florida flagfish Jordanella floridae. Ethology 107:1035–1052
Townsend TJ, Wootton RJ (1985) Variation in the mating system of biparental cichlid fish, Cichlasoma panamense. Behaviour 95:181–197
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179
Wilkinson L (1999) SYSTAT 9. SPSS, Chicago
Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690
Acknowledgements
All procedures used in this study comply with the national laws and regulations of the United States. Financial support for this study was provided by the University of Helsinki (to K.B.), the Fulbright Foundation and the Academy of Finland (to K.L.), and the University of Florida (to C.St. M.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Krause
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonnevier, K., Lindström, K. & St. Mary, C. Parental care and mate attraction in the Florida flagfish, Jordanella floridae . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53, 358–363 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0584-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0584-5