Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reperfusion of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Following Embolotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Detachable Versus Pushable Coils

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Embolisation (arterial)
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare 1 year post-embolization reperfusion rates in pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) treated with the 0.035″ Interlock™ Fibered IDC™ Occlusion System coils (IDC) (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) versus 0.035″ Nester coils (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, Indiana).

Materials and Methods

A randomized controlled trial was performed randomizing individual PAVMs to treatment with IDC versus Nester coils at the largest hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia center in Canada. The primary outcome was CT evidence of reperfusion at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural complications, fluoroscopy time and contrast volume.

Results

Our study was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment and subsequent expiration of funding. A total of 46 PAVMs in 25 patients (64% female) were included in our study; 26 randomized to Nester coils and 20 randomized to IDC. One patient was lost to follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 421.2 ± 215.7 days, no significant difference in PAVM reperfusion was detected between Nester coils and IDC (0% vs. 5.6%, p > 0.05). No major periprocedural complications were noted in either group. Fluoroscopy time (Nester: 15.0 ± 11.8 min vs. IDC 16.0 ± 5.4 min, p > 0.05) and contrast volume (Nester: 80.3 ± 36.5 ml vs. IDC 87.3 ± 51.7 ml, p > 0.05) utilized did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

No significant difference was detected in PAVM reperfusion rates, periprocedural complication rates, contrast volume utilization or fluoroscopy time following embolization with IDC and Nester coils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Faughnan ME, Granton JT, Young LH. The pulmonary vascular complications of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(5):1186–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta S, Faughnan ME, Bayoumi AM. Embolization for pulmonary arteriovenous malformation in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a decision analysis. Chest. 2009;136(3):849–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Faughnan ME, Palda VA, Garcia-Tsao G, Geisthoff UW, McDonald J, Proctor DD, et al. International guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. J Med Genet. 2011;48(2):73–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Milic A, Chan RP, Cohen JH, Faughnan ME. Reperfusion of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations after embolotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(12):1675–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mager JJ, Overtoom TTC, Blauw H, Lammers JWJ, Westermann CJJ. Embolotherapy of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: long-term results in 112 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(5):451–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu CC-T, Kwan GNC, Thompson SA, Evans-Barns H, van Driel ML. Embolisation for pulmonary arteriovenous malformation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;15(8):CD008017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pollak JS, Saluja S, Thabet A, Henderson KJ, Denbow N, White RI. Clinical and anatomic outcomes after embolotherapy of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(1):35–44 quiz 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. White RI, Pollak J, Persing J, Henderson KJ, Thomson JG, Burdge CM. Long-term outcome of embolotherapy and surgery for high-flow extremity arteriovenous malformations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11(10):1285–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL. Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the Cirse classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(8):1141–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee DW, White RI, Egglin TK, Pollak JS, Fayad PB, Wirth JA, et al. Embolotherapy of large pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64(4):930–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tau N, Atar E, Mei-Zahav M, Bachar GN, Dagan T, Birk E, et al. Amplatzer vascular plugs versus coils for embolization of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(8):1110–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trerotola SO, Pyeritz RE. Does use of coils in addition to amplatzer vascular plugs prevent recanalization? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):766–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shin JH, Park SJ, Ko G-Y, Yoon H-K, Gwon D-I, Kim J-H, et al. Embolotherapy for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in patients without hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Korean J Radiol. 2010;11(3):312–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayashi S, Baba Y, Senokuchi T, Nakajo M. Efficacy of venous sac embolization for pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: comparison with feeding artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(12):1566–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Boston Scientific (Marlborough, Massachusetts) who provided research grant funding for this study.

Funding

This study was funded by a research grant provided by Boston Scientific Corporation which provided coil material for embolization. Boston Scientific was not involved in data collection, analysis, data interpretation or manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean A. Kennedy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

VP has received a research grant from Boston Scientific Corporation. SAK, MEF and NTV have no conflicts of interest.

Consent for Publication

Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study.

Ethical Standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kennedy, S.A., Faughnan, M.E., Vozoris, N.T. et al. Reperfusion of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Following Embolotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Detachable Versus Pushable Coils. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 43, 904–909 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02422-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02422-8

Keywords

Navigation