Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair for Ruptured Descending Aortic Pathologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies: A commentary

  • Commentary
  • Commentary
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Salsano A, Salsano G, Spinella G, Zaottini F, Mavilio N, Perocchio G, et al. Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair for Ruptured Descending Aortic Pathologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. CardioVascu Interv Radiol. 2021.

  2. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adultThe task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the european society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(41):2873–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Riambau V, Böckler D, Brunkwall J, Cao P, Chiesa R, Coppi G, et al. Editor’s choice & #x2013; management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the european society for vascular surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(1):4–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not supported by any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Safa Salim

  2. Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

    Michael P. Jenkins

Authors
  1. Safa Salim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael P. Jenkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Jenkins.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

SS has no conflicts of interest. MJ has received financial support from Phillips, Terumo, Gore and Bayer.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Consent for Publication

For this type of study, consent for publication is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salim, S., Jenkins, M.P. Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair for Ruptured Descending Aortic Pathologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies: A commentary. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 44, 1720–1721 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02936-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02936-9

Search

Navigation