Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II study of bevacizumab plus irinotecan on the treatment of relapsed resistant small cell lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This phase II study investigates the efficacy and safety of DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan plus bevacizumab a monoclonal antibody against VEGF (BEVIRI) in patients with relapsed chemo-resistant SCLC.

Methods

Patients who previously completed treatment with cisplatin–etoposide who relapsed within 3 months, had measurable extensive-stage SCLC, ECOG performance status 0–2 and adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, were given intravenous irinotecan 175 mg/m2 plus intravenous bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 and 15 in 30 day cycles for a target of at least four cycles. No patients had received prophylactic intracranial irradiation. Treatment response was assessed with computer tomography scans with the completion of two consecutive cycles. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR).

Results

Thirty-two patients were enrolled and 28 of them were eligible for evaluation of response, toxicity and survival. The median age was 63.5 years (range 48–73). The ORR (CR and PR) was 25 % (95 % CI 8.9–41.0) and including patients with stable disease overall disease control rate at 2 months was 89 % (95 % CI 77.41–100). The median duration of response was 6 months, median progression-free survival was 3 months (mean PFS: 3.2, 95 % CI 2.7–3.7), and median overall survival was 6 months (mean OS: 6.3, 95 % CI 5.4–7.1). The PFS rate at 6 months was 3.6 %, and 1-year OS rate was 3.6 %. The median number of cycles received was 4.5 (range 1–6). There were two (7.1 %) hematologic (neutropenia) and one (3.5 %) non-hematologic (proteinuria) serious grades 3–4 adverse reactions without necessitating treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion

BEVIRI combination in relapsed chemo-resistant SCLC patients demonstrates promising efficacy and low toxicity compared to historical controls. Further investigation is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2015) Cancer facts & figures 2015. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@editorial/documents/document/acspc-044552.pdf

  2. Fischer B, Arcaro A (2008) Current status of clinical trials for small cell lung cancer. Rev Recent Clin Trials 3:40–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, Read W, Tierney R, Vlahiotis A, Spitznagel EL, Piccirilo J (2006) Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol 24:4539–4544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Schacter LP, Cherng NC, Cohen HJ, Crawford J, Randolph JA, Goodlow JL, Broun GO (2010) Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21(5):v244–v247

    Google Scholar 

  5. Niell HB, Herndon JE 2nd, Miller AA, Watson DM, Sandler AB, Kelly K, Marks RS, Perry MC, Ansari RH, Otterson G, Ellerton J, Vokes EE, Green MR, Cancer and Leukemia Group (2005) Randomized phase III intergroup trial of etoposide and cisplatin with or without paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with wxtensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9732. J Clin Oncol 23(16):3752–3759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stathopoulos GP, Trafalis D, Dimitroulis J, Kosmas Ch, Stathopoulos J, Tsavdaridis D (2013) Combination of three cytotoxic agents in small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 71(2):413–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ardizzoni A, Tiseo M, Boni L (2014) Validation of standard definition of sensitive versus refractory relapsed small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of topotecan second-line trials. Eur J Cancer 50(13):2211–2218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Brien ME, Ciuleanu TE, Tsekov H, Shparyk Y, Cuceviá B, Juhasz G, Thatcher N, Ross GA, Dane GC, Crofts T (2006) Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5441–5447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stathopoulos GP, Ardavanis A, Papakotoulas P, Pectasides D, Papadopoulos G, Antoniou D, Athanasiadis A, Trafalis D, Anagnostopoulos A, Koutantos J, Vaslamatzis M (2010) Myelotoxicity of oral topotecan in relation to treatment duration and dosage: a phase I study. Anticancer Drugs 21:202–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eckardt JR, von Powel J, Pujol JL, Papai Z, Quiox E, Ardizzoni A, Poulin R, Preston AJ, Dane G, Ross G (2007) Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:2086–2092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, Negoro S, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Fukuoka M, Mori K, Watanabe K, Tamura T, Yamamoto S, Saijo N, Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2002) Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346(2):85–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zatloukal P, Cardenal F, Szczesna A, Gorbunova V, Moiseyenko V, Zhang X, Cisar L, Soria JC, Domine M, Thomas M (2010) A multicenter international randomized phase III study comparing cisplatin in combination with irinotecan or etoposide in previously untreated small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease. Ann Oncol 21(9):1810–1816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lara PN Jr, Natale R, Crowley J, Lenz HJ, Redman MW, Carleton JE, Jett J, Langer CJ, Kuebler JP, Dakhil SR, Chansky K, Gandara DR (2009) Phase III trial of irinotecan/cisplatin compared with etoposide/cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: clinical and pharmacogenomics results from SWOG S0124. J Clin Oncol 27(15):2530–2535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C, Einhorn L, Guthrie T Jr, Beck T, Ansari R, Ellis P, Byrne M, Morrison M, Hariharan S, Wang B, Sandler A (2006) Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin in patients with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:2038–2043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Masuda N, Fukuoka M, Kusunoki Y, Matsui K, Takifuji N, Kudoh S, Negoro S, Nishioka M, Nakagawa K, Takada M (1992) CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 10(8):1225–1229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ready NE, Dudek AZ, Pang HH, Hodgson LD, Graziano SL, Green MR, Vokes EE (2011) Cisplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 3306, a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 29:4436–4441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Spigel DR, Greco FA, Zubkus JD, Murphy PB, Saez RA, Farley C, Yardley DA, Burris HA 3rd, Hainsworth JD (2009) Phase II trial of irinotecan, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4(12):1555–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jalal S, Bedano P, Einhorn L, Bhatia S, Ansari R, Bechar N, Koneru K, Govindan R, Wu J, Yu M, Schneider B, Hanna N (2010) Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with chemosensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer: a safety, feasibility, and efficacy study from the Hoosier Oncology Group. J Thorac Oncol 5(12):2008–2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mountzios G, Emmanouilidis C, Vardakis N, Kontopodis E, Hatzidaki D, Popis E, Karachaliou N, Kotsakis A, Agelidou M, Georgoulias V (2012) Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with chemoresistant relapsed small cell lung cancer as salvage treatment: a phase II multicenter study of the Hellenic Oncology research group. Lung Cancer 77:146–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wildiers H, Guetens G, De Boeck G, Verbeken E, Landuyt B, Landuyt W, de Brujin EA, van Oosterom AT (2003) Effect of antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment on the intratumoral uptake of CPT-11. Br J Cancer 88(12):1979–1986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Spigel DR, Waterhouse DM, Lane S, Legenne P, Bhatt K (2013) Efficacy and safety of oral topotecan and bevacizumab combination as second-line treatment for relapsed small-cell lung cancer: an open-label multicenter single-arm phase II study. Clin Lung Cancer 14:356–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alifieris C, Trafalis DT (2015) Glioblastoma multiforme: pathogenesis and treatment. Pharmacol Ther 152:63–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Basch E, Reeve B, Mitchell SA, Clauser SB, Minasian LM, Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Hay J, Atkinson TM, Abernethy AP, Bruner DW, Cleeland CS, Sloan JA, Chilukuri R, Baumgartner P, Denicoff A, St Germain D, O’Mara AM, Chen A, Kelaghan J, Benett AV, Sit L, Rogak L, Barz A, Paul DB, Schrag D (2014) Development of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst 106(9):dju244. doi:10.1093/jnci/dju244

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar DoddL, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung SH, Lee T, Kim K, George SL (2004) Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. Stat Med 23(4):561–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Owonikoko TK, Behera M, Chen Z, Bhimani C, Curran WJ, Khuri FR, Ramalingam SS (2012) A systematic analysis of efficacy of second line chemotherapy in sensitive and refractory small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 7:866–872

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang J, Liang X, Zhou X, Huang L, Huang R, Chu Z, Zhan Q (2012) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing irinotecan/platinum with etoposide/platinum in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 5(6):867–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pallis A, Agelidou A, Agelaki S, Varthalitis I, Pavlakou G, Gerogianni A, Papakotoulas P, Rapti A, Chandrinos V, Christophyllakis C, Georgoulias V (2009) A multicenter randomized phase II study of the irinotecan/gemcitabine doublet versus irinotecan monotherapy in previously treated patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 65:187–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Masuda N, Matsui K, Negoro S, Takifuji N, Takeda K, Yana T, Kobayashi M, Hirashima T, Kusunoki Y, Ushjima S, Kawase I, Tada T, Sawaguchi H, Fukuoka M (1998) Combination of irinotecan and etoposide for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:3329–3334

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramalingam SS, Foster J, Gooding W, Evans T, Sulecki M, Belani CP (2010) Phase 2 study of irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or refractory small cell lung cancer. Cancer 116:1344–1349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lucchi M, Mussi A, Fontanini G, Faviana P, Ribechini A, Angeletti C (2002) Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): the angiogenic phenomenon. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21:1105–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ustuner Z, Saip P, Yasasever V, Vural B, Yazar A, Bal C, Ozturk B, Ozbek U, Topuz E (2008) Prognostic and predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor and its soluble receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 levels in the sera of small cell lung cancer patients. Med Oncol 25:394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhan P, Wang J, Lv XJ, Wang Q, Qiu LX, Lin XQ, Yu LK, Song Y (2009) Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol 4:1094–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Spigel DR, Hainsworth JD, Yardley DA, Raefsky E, Patton J, Peacock N, Farley C, Burris HA 3rd, Greco FA (2010) Tracheoesophageal fistula formation in patients with lung cancer treated with chemoradiation and bevacizumab. J Clin Oncol 28:43–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harmsma M, Schutte B, Ramaekers FC (2013) Serum markers in small cell lung cancer: opportunities for improvement. Biochim Biophys Acta 1836(2):255–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Naka N, Kawahara M, Okishio K, Hosoe S, Ogawara M, Atagi S, Takemoto Y, Ueno K, Kawaguchi T, Tsuchiyama T, Furuse K (2002) Phase II study of weekly irinotecan and carboplatin for refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 37:319–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ichiki M, Gohara R, Rikimaru T, Kitajima T, Fujiki R, Shimada A, Aizawa H (2003) Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and ifosfamide as second-line treatment of refractory or sensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer: a phase II study. Chemotherapy 49:200–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schuette W, Nagel S, Juergens S, Bork I, Wollschlaeger B, Schaedlich S, Blankenburg T (2005) Phase II trial of gemcitabine/irinotecan in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 7:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rocha-Lima CM, Herndon JE 2nd, Lee ME, Atkins JN, Mauer A, Vokes E, Green MR, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (2007) Phase II trial of irinotecan/gemcitabine as second-line therapy for relapsed and refractory small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 39902. Ann Oncol 18(2):331–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Xenidis N, Vardakis N, Varthalitis I, Giassas S, Kontopodis E, Ziras N, Gioulbasanis I, Samonis G, Kalbakis K, Georgoulias V (2011) A multicenter phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with irinotecan as second-line treatment of patients with refractory small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68:63–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantinos Alifieris.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trafalis, D.T., Alifieris, C., Stathopoulos, G.P. et al. Phase II study of bevacizumab plus irinotecan on the treatment of relapsed resistant small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77, 713–722 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-2983-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-2983-0

Keywords

Navigation