Skip to main content
Log in

A hybrid approach of density-based topology, multilayer perceptron, and water cycle-moth flame algorithm for multi-stage optimal design of a flexure mechanism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This article develops an optimal design method with multiple stages for a flexure mechanism. This mechanism can be employed as a rotary joint or a torsional spring. The developed method is a hybridization of density-based topology, multilayer perceptron, and water cycle-moth flame algorithm. Firstly, the topology design for flexure mechanism is conducted to create a draft shape of flexure mechanism, and it is redesigned to seek a proper structure. Secondly, datasets of finite element simulations are collected. These data are then normalized, and the feed-forward multilayer perceptron (FMLP) is utilized to formulate the regression models for all performances. In order to determine the best suitable parameters of each FMLP model, their architectures are optimized by the Taguchi technique. By evaluating the measurement indexes such as correlation coefficient, mean square error, and root mean square error, the developed FMLP models show a superiority as compared to the multiple linear regression. Then, the sensitivity of design parameters is investigated. Thirdly, based on the well-established FMLP models, the size optimization is conducted by the water cycle-moth flame algorithm. Finally, in comparison with the FMLP-based differential evolution, FMLP-based firefly algorithm, FMLP-based particle swarm optimization, and FMLP-based teaching-learning based optimization, the present method has a better efficiency through the Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howell LL, Magleby SP, Olsen BM (2013) Handbook of compliant mechanisms. John Wiley & Sons

  2. Ding B, Yang ZX, Xiao X, Zhang G (2019) Design of reconfigurable planar micro-positioning stages based on function modules. IEEE Access 7:15102–15112. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2894619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ling M, Cao J, Jiang Z, Lin J (2017) Modular kinematics and statics modeling for precision positioning stage. Mech Mach Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xi X, Clancy T, Wu X et al (2016) A MEMS XY-stage integrating compliant mechanism for nanopositioning at sub-nanometer resolution. J Micromech Microeng 26:25014. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/26/2/025014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Qin F, Gong D, Chen Y et al (2019) Integrated piezoelectric micromechanical vibration platform for six degree of freedom motion. J Micromech Microeng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6439/ab3b17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandrasekaran K, Thondiyath A (2017) Design of a two degree-of-freedom compliant tool tip for a handheld powered surgical tool. J Med Devices Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. George BL, Bharanidaran R (2020) Design of multifunctional compliant forceps for medical application. Aust J Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2020.1747151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho NL, Dao TP, Le Chau N, Huang SC (2019) Multi-objective optimization design of a compliant microgripper based on hybrid teaching learning-based optimization algorithm. Microsyst Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-4222-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiang L, Longjia Z, He B et al (2021) Design and analysis of three-dimensional compliant structure suitable for integrated design of support and drive of space optical mirror. Optik (Stuttg). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao D, Zhu Z, Huang P et al (2020) Development of a piezoelectrically actuated dual-stage fast tool servo. Mech Syst Signal Process. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen W, Zhang X, Li H et al (2017) Nonlinear analysis and optimal design of a novel piezoelectric-driven compliant microgripper. Mech Mach Theory 118:32–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang ZW, Lan CC (2015) An adjustable gravity-balancing mechanism using planar extension and compression springs. Mech Mach Theory 92:314–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsieh HC, Chen DF, Chien L, Lan CC (2017) Design of a parallel actuated exoskeleton for adaptive and safe robotic shoulder rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2017.2717874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu Q (2015) Design of a large-range compliant rotary micropositioning stage with angle and torque sensing. IEEE Sens J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2377779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang P, Yang S, Xu Q (2018) Design and optimization of a new compliant rotary positioning stage with constant output torque. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0213-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu Q (2013) Design and implementation of a novel rotary micropositioning system driven by linear voice coil motor. Rev Sci Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4803187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen DN, Dao T, Chau N Le, Dang VA (2019) Hybrid approach of finite element method, Kigring metamodel, and multiobjective genetic algorithm for computational optimization of a flexure elbow joint for upper-limb assistive device. https://www.springer.com/engineering/electronics/j. Accessed 20 April 2021

  18. Chau N Le, Le HG, Dao T, et al (2019) Efficient hybrid method of FEA-based RSM and PSO algorithm for multi-objective optimization design for a compliant rotary joint for upper limb assistive device. https://www.springer.com/engineering/electronics/j. Accessed 20 April 2021

  19. Lobontiu N (2002) Compliant mechanisms: design of flexure hinges. CRC press, Routledge

  20. Tran NT, Le Chau N, Dao TP (2020) A new butterfly-inspired compliant joint with 3-DOF in-plane motion. Arab J Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04415-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Le CN, Dao TP, Nguyen VTT (2018) Optimal design of a dragonfly-inspired compliant joint for camera positioning system of nanoindentation tester based on a hybrid integration of jaya-ANFIS. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8546095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Jodah A, Shirinzadeh B, Ghafarian M et al (2020) A fuzzy disturbance observer based control approach for a novel 1-DOF micropositioning mechanism. Mechatronics. 65(102317):1–15https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2019.102317

  23. Wang F, Zhao X, Huo Z et al (2021) A 2-DOF nano-positioning scanner with novel compound decoupling-guiding mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 155(104066):1–14

  24. Ding B, Li Y, Xiao X et al (2017) Design and analysis of a 3-DOF planar micromanipulation stage with large rotational displacement for micromanipulation system. Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-8-117-2017

  25. Pinskier J, Shirinzadeh B, Clark L, Qin Y (2018) Development of a 4-DOF haptic micromanipulator utilizing a hybrid parallel-serial flexure mechanism. Mechatronics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen W, Yang S, Liu J et al (2017) Design of a novel 5-DOF flexure-based compound alignment stage for roll-to-roll printed electronics. Rev Sci Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang D, Li P, Zhang J et al (2019) Design and assessment of a 6-DOF micro/nanopositioning system. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 24:2097–2107. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2019.2931619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Edwards BT, Jensen BD, Howell LL (2001) A pseudo-rigid-body model for initially-curved pinned-pinned segments used in compliant mechanisms. J Mech Des Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1376396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ling M, Cao J, Pehrson N (2019) Kinetostatic and dynamic analyses of planar compliant mechanisms via a two-port dynamic stiffness model. Precis Eng 57:149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Choi SB, Han SS, Han YM, Thompson BS (2007) A magnification device for precision mechanisms featuring piezoactuators and flexure hinges: design and experimental validation. Mech Mach Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.08.009

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Le ZhuW, Zhu Z, Shi Y et al (2016) Design, modeling, analysis and testing of a novel piezo-actuated XY compliant mechanism for large workspace nano-positioning. Smart Mater Struct 25:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/115033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ling M, Howell LL, Cao J, Chen G (2020) Kinetostatic and dynamic modeling of flexure-based compliant mechanisms: a survey. Appl Mech Rev 72. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sigmund O, Maute K (2013) Topology optimization approaches: a comparative review. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48:1031–1055

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Qiu L, Yue X, Xie Z (2019) Design and analysis of Multicavity Flexure Hinge (MCFH) based on three-dimensional continuum topology optimization. Mech Mach Theory 139:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cao L, Dolovich AT, Zhang WC (2015) Hybrid compliant mechanism design using a mixed mesh of flexure hinge elements and beam elements through topology optimization. J Mech Des Trans ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. De Leon DM, Alexandersen J, Jun JS, Sigmund O (2015) Stress-constrained topology optimization for compliant mechanism design. Struct Multidiscip Optim. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1279-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Xia Q, Shi T (2016) Topology optimization of compliant mechanism and its support through a level set method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.03.017

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuresangsai P, Cole MOT (2019) Kinematic modeling and design optimization of flexure-jointed planar mechanisms using polynomial bases for flexure curvature. Mech Mach Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang N, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Cui C (2018) Optimization of a 2-DOF micro-positioning stage using corrugated flexure units. Mech Mach Theory 121:683–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lu Q, Cui Z, Chen X (2015) Fuzzy multi-objective optimization for movement performance of deep-notch elliptical flexure hinges. Rev Sci Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Talaat M, Farahat MA, Mansour N, Hatata AY (2020) Load forecasting based on grasshopper optimization and a multilayer feed-forward neural network using regressive approach. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Guo H, Zhou J, Koopialipoor M et al (2019) Deep neural network and whale optimization algorithm to assess flyrock induced by blasting. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00816-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou J, Nekouie A, Arslan CA et al (2019) Novel approach for forecasting the blast-induced AOp using a hybrid fuzzy system and firefly algorithm. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00725-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mishra M, Bhatia AS, Maity D (2019) A comparative study of regression, neural network and neuro-fuzzy inference system for determining the compressive strength of brick–mortar masonry by fusing nondestructive testing data. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00810-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sack S, Åbom M (2020) Acoustic plane-wave decomposition by means of multilayer perceptron neural networks. J Sound Vib. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li R, Liu Z, Rohskopf A et al (2020) A deep neural network interatomic potential for studying thermal conductivity of β-Ga2O3. Appl Phys Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Eskandari-Naddaf H, Kazemi R (2017) ANN prediction of cement mortar compressive strength, influence of cement strength class. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou Y, Wang Y, Wang K et al (2020) Hybrid genetic algorithm method for efficient and robust evaluation of remaining useful life of supercapacitors. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu H, Cai Z, Wang Y (2010) Hybridizing particle swarm optimization with differential evolution for constrained numerical and engineering optimization. Appl Soft Comput J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Awad NH, Ali MZ, Mallipeddi R, Suganthan PN (2019) An efficient differential evolution algorithm for stochastic OPF based active–reactive power dispatch problem considering renewable generators. Appl Soft Comput J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ding X, Hasanipanah M, Nikafshan Rad H, Zhou W (2020) Predicting the blast-induced vibration velocity using a bagged support vector regression optimized with firefly algorithm. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-00937-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP (2011) Teaching-learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Comput Aided Des 43:303–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Venkata Rao R (2016) Jaya: a simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tran NT, Le Chau N, Dao TP (2020) An effective hybrid approach of desirability, fuzzy logic, ANFIS and LAPO algorithm for optimizing compliant mechanism. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-00963-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rao RV, Pawar RB (2020) Constrained design optimization of selected mechanical system components using Rao algorithms. Appl Soft Comput J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Eskandar H, Sadollah A, Bahreininejad A, Hamdi M (2012) Water cycle algorithm—a novel metaheuristic optimization method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Comput Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl Based Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ashour AS (2020) Springer tracts in nature-inspired computing. Applied nature—inspired computing: algorithms and case studies. Springer, Singapore

  59. Nilanjan D (2017) Advancements in applied metaheuristic computing. IGI Global

    Google Scholar 

  60. Dey N, Chaki J, Moraru L et al (2020) Firefly algorithm and its variants in digital image processing: a comprehensive review. Springer, Singapore

  61. Sarkar M, Banerjee S, Badr Y, Sangaiah AK (2017) Configuring a trusted cloud service model for smart city exploration using hybrid intelligence. Int J Ambient Comput Intell 8:1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJACI.2017070101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Hore S et al (2017) Particle swarm optimization trained neural network for structural failure prediction of multistoried RC buildings. Neural Comput Appl 28:2005–2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2190-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Khadse VM, Mahalle PN, Shinde GR (2020) Statistical study of machine learning algorithms using parametric and non-parametric tests. Int J Ambient Comput Intell 11:80–105. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijaci.2020070105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Khalilpourazari S, Khalilpourazary S (2019) An efficient hybrid algorithm based on water cycle and moth-flame optimization algorithms for solving numerical and constrained engineering optimization problems. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2894-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City (IUH) under grant number 118/HD-DHCN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanh-Phong Dao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chau, N.L., Tran, N.T. & Dao, TP. A hybrid approach of density-based topology, multilayer perceptron, and water cycle-moth flame algorithm for multi-stage optimal design of a flexure mechanism. Engineering with Computers 38 (Suppl 4), 2833–2865 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01417-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01417-4

Keywords

Navigation