Zusammenfassung
Die Sorge vor Strahlenexposition beschäftigt viele junge Frauen in der Kardiologie und ist mit für die niedrige Anzahl invasiv tätiger Kolleginnen verantwortlich. Der Frauenanteil in der Elektrophysiologie ist besonders niedrig. Dabei erlauben moderne 3‑D-Mapping-Techniken heutzutage strahlenarme und sogar strahlenfreie Katheterablationen. Die Perspektive „zero fluoro“ dient nicht nur der Patientensicherheit, sondern hat auch das Potenzial, die Elektrophysiologie weiblicher zu machen.
Abstract
Many young women in cardiology are concerned about radiation exposure, and this issue contributes to the low number of female interventional cardiologists. The proportion of women in interventional electrophysiology is particularly low. However, radiation exposure during catheter ablation of arrhythmias can be minimized and even avoided completely using modern 3D mapping systems. The “zero fluoro” approach can improve patients’ safety but also motivate more women to become interventional electrophysiologists.
Literatur
Andreassi MG, Piccaluga E, Guagliumi G et al (2016) Occupational health risks in cardiac catheterization laboratory workers. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 9:e3273. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003273
Busch S, Johnson V (2020) Women in electrophysiology: taking the right course of action. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 31:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-020-00701-y
Capranzano P, Kunadian V, Mauri J et al (2016) Motivations for and barriers to choosing an interventional cardiology career path: results from the EAPCI Women Committee worldwide survey. EuroIntervention 12:53–59. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY15M07_03
Casella M, Russo Dello A, Pelargonio G et al (2016) Near zerO fluoroscopic exPosure during catheter ablAtion of supRavenTricular arrhYthmias: the NO-PARTY multicentre randomized trial. Europace 18:1565–1572. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv344
Casella M, Russo Dello A, Russo E et al (2018) X‑Ray exposure in cardiac electrophysiology: a retrospective analysis in 8150 patients over 7 years of activity in a modern, large-volume laboratory. J Am Heart Assoc 7:1. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008233
Eckardt L, Frommeyer G, Sommer P et al (2018) Updated survey on interventional electrophysiology: 5‑year follow-up of infrastructure, procedures, and training positions in Germany. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:820–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.01.001
Georges J‑L, Karam N, Tafflet M et al (2017) Time-course reduction in patient exposure to radiation from coronary Interventional procedures: the greater paris area percutaneous coronary intervention registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 10:261. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005268
Giaccardi M, Del Rosso A, Guarnaccia V et al (2016) Near-zero x‑ray in arrhythmia ablation using a 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system: A multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm 13:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.003
Guarguagli S, Cazzoli I, Kempny A et al (2018) A new technique for zero fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation without the use of Intracardiac echocardiography. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:1647–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.08.021
Kosiuk J, Fiedler L, Ernst S et al (2021) Fluoroscopy usage in contemporary interventional electrophysiology: insights from a European registry. Clin Cardiol 44:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23411
Mascia G, Giaccardi M (2020) A new era in zero X‑ray ablation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 9:121–127. https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2020.02
Pani A, Giuseppina B, Bonanno C et al (2018) Predictors of zero X‑Ray ablation for supraventricular tachycardias in a nationwide multicenter experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 11:e5592. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005592
Picano E, Vañó E, Rehani MM et al (2014) The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 35:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht394
Santoro A, Di Clemente F, Baiocchi C et al (2019) From near-zero to zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:2397–2404. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14121
Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G et al (2013) Physician-controlled costs: the choice of equipment used for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 36:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9782-x
Yang L, Sun G, Chen X et al (2016) meta-analysis of zero or near-zero fluoroscopy use during ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 118:1511–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
J. Müller-Leisse erhielt einen Fellowship grant von Boston Scientific und ein Honorar sowie Fortbildungsunterstützung von Medtronic. H.A.K. Hillmann gibt an, dass keine Interessenskonflikte bestehen. C. Veltmann erhielt Referentenhonorare, Reisekostenunterstützung und/oder einen Fellowship grant von Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Pfizer, Zoll. D. Duncker erhielt Referentenhonorare und/oder Reisekostenunterstützung von Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Pfizer, Zoll.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Additional information
Rubrikherausgeber
D. Duncker, Hannover
V. Johnson, Gießen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller-Leisse, J., Hillmann, H.A.K., Veltmann, C. et al. „Zero fluoro“ – eine Chance für mehr Frauen in der Elektrophysiologie. Herzschr Elektrophys 32, 285–287 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-021-00767-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-021-00767-2