Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of surgeon’s learning curve: complications and outcome after hip arthroscopy

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of the present study was to determine the incidence and type of complications during and after hip arthroscopy as well as the effect of the surgeon’s learning curve on the occurrence of complications. We expect that the currently reported prevalence especially of minor complications is likely to be underreported in most retrospective series based on chart analysis.

Materials and methods

The study included all consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between 2006 and 2014 at a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks starting with the first patient undergoing hip arthroscopy at the institution. Patient outcome was evaluated using the WOMAC score, VAS for pain, SF-36 questionnaire and the hip-outcome score. Additionally, intra- and postoperative complications were recorded via a questionnaire and additional review of patient files.

Results

We identified 529 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between 2006 and 2014. Complete data could be gathered from 485 patients (91.7%). Major complications occurred in three patients (0.6%; fractures of the femoral neck requiring surgical treatment in one case). Minor complications that did not require further intervention were self-limiting postoperative temporary neurapraxia, hematoma, self-limiting dyspareunia, deep vein thrombosis and impaired wound healing, with hematoma and temporary paresthesia due to traction neurapraxia being the most common ones (22.5 and 16.4% respectively). The overall re-operation rate was 15.7% with conversion to total hip arthroplasty being the most common (11.9%).

Conclusions

The overall major complication rate was low and thus hip arthroscopy can be rated as a safe procedure. But minor complications such as hematoma and temporary paresthesia due to traction neurapraxia are common and currently underreported. Surgeons’ learning curves show a reduction of major complications once 60 procedures per surgeon per year is surpassed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alradwan H, Philippon MJ, Farrokhyar F, Chu R, Whelan D, Bhandari M, Ayeni OR (2012) Return to preinjury activity levels after surgical management of femoroacetabular impingement in athletes. Arthroscopy 28(10):1567–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Botser IB, Smith TW Jr, Nasser R, Domb BG (2011) Open surgical dislocation versus arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison of clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 27(2):270–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hufeland M, Kruger D, Haas NP, Perka C, Schroder JH (2016) Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement shows persistent clinical improvement in the mid-term. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(5):687–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Konan S, Rhee SJ, Haddad FS (2011) Hip arthroscopy: analysis of a single surgeon’s learning experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 2):52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCarthy JC, Lee JA (2006) Hip arthroscopy: indications, outcomes, and complications. Instr Course Lect 55:301–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng VY, Arora N, Best TM, Pan X, Ellis TJ (2010) Efficacy of surgery for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 38(11):2337–2345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke MT, Arora A, Villar RN (2003) Hip arthroscopy: complications in 1054 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:84–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000043048.84315.af

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Byrd JW (1994) Hip arthroscopy utilizing the supine position. Arthroscopy 10(3):275–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris JD, McCormick FM, Abrams GD, Gupta AK, Ellis TJ, Bach BR Jr, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ (2013) Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy 29(3):589–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kowalczuk M, Bhandari M, Farrokhyar F, Wong I, Chahal M, Neely S, Gandhi R, Ayeni OR (2013) Complications following hip arthroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(7):1669–1675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler J, Owens BD (2010) Abdominal compartment syndrome after hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 26(1):128–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mardones RM, Gonzalez C, Chen Q, Zobitz M, Kaufman KR, Trousdale RT (2005) Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):273–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ayeni OR, Bedi A, Lorich DG, Kelly BT (2011) Femoral neck fracture after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(9):e47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jayasekera N, Aprato A, Villar RN (2013) Are crutches required after hip arthroscopy? A case-control study. Hip Int 23(3):269–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukushima K, Takahira N, Uchiyama K, Moriya M, Minato T, Takaso M (2016) The incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) during hip arthroscopic surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(10):1431–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rhee SM, Kang SY, Jang EC, Kim JY, Ha YC (2016) Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic acetabular labral repair using knot-tying or knotless suture technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(10):1411–1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellenrieder M, Tischer T, Bader R, Kreuz PC, Mittelmeier W (2017) Patient-specific factors influencing the traction forces in hip arthroscopy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(1):81–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beckmann JT, Wylie JD, Potter MQ, Maak TG, Greene TH, Aoki SK (2015) Effect of naproxen prophylaxis on heterotopic ossification following hip arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(24):2032–2037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Larson CM, Giveans MR (2008) Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: early outcomes measures. Arthroscopy 24(5):540–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Randelli F, Pierannunzii L, Banci L, Ragone V, Aliprandi A, Buly R (2010) Heterotopic ossifications after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: the role of NSAID prophylaxis. J Orthop Traumatol 11(4):245–250

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bedi A, Zbeda RM, Bueno VF, Downie B, Dolan M, Kelly BT (2012) The incidence of heterotopic ossification after hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 40(4):854–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Griffin DW, Kinnard MJ, Formby PM, McCabe MP, Anderson TD (2016) Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the older adult: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516667915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dietrich F, Ries C, Eiermann C, Miehlke W, Sobau C (2014) Complications in hip arthroscopy: necessity of supervision during the learning curve. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(4):953–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee YK, Ha YC, Hwang DS, Koo KH (2013) Learning curve of basic hip arthroscopy technique: CUSUM analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(8):1940–1944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany

    Karl F. Schüttler, Rose Schramm, Bilal F. El-Zayat, Turgay Efe & Thomas J. Heyse

  2. ORTHOmedic, Offenbach, Germany

    Markus D. Schofer

  3. Orthopaedicum Lich, Lich, Germany

    Turgay Efe

Authors
  1. Karl F. Schüttler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rose Schramm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bilal F. El-Zayat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Markus D. Schofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Turgay Efe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas J. Heyse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl F. Schüttler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schüttler, K.F., Schramm, R., El-Zayat, B.F. et al. The effect of surgeon’s learning curve: complications and outcome after hip arthroscopy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 1415–1421 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2960-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2960-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation