Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgery-related complications and long-term functional morbidity after segmental colo-rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis (ENDO-RESECT morb)

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Segmental resection has been generally associated with increased peri-operative risk of major complications. While major complications are widely acknowledged, minor complications, such as slight, to moderate infections, peripheral sensory disturbances, bladder voiding dysfunction, postoperative urinary obstruction, and sexual disorders are less reported. The aim of this study is to investigate the surgery-related complications and functional disorders, as well as to evaluate their persistence after long-term follow-up in women undergone segmental resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Special attention is given to evaluating impairments of bowel, bladder, and sexual function.

Methods

All clinical data obtained from medical records of women who underwent segmental resection for intestinal endometriosis between October 2005, and November 2017, in Catholic University Institutions. Perioperative morbidity was classified by Extended Clavien–Dindo classification. Postoperative intestinal, voiding, and sexual morbidity was estimated by the compilation of specific questionnaires.

Results

Fifty women were included in the study. Forty-three high colorectal resections (86%), 6 low resections (12%), and 1 ultra-low resection (2%) were performed, while in 3 cases (6%) multiple resections were needed. The overall complication rate was 44%. Nineteen women (38%) experienced early complications and 3 women (6%) late complications. Long-term functional postoperative complications were composed of intestinal in 30%, urinary in 50%, and sexual in 64% of the study population. Median follow-up was 55.5 months.

Conclusions

Segmental resection, when indicated, offers a radical and feasible approach for bowel deep infiltrating endometriosis, resulting in an improved general quality of life. The bowel and bladder complications appear to be acceptable and often reversible. Postoperative sexual dysfunctions, such as anorgasmia and insufficient vaginal lubrication, appear to persist over time. Surgeons and women have to be aware of the incidence of this kind of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koninckx PR, Meuleman C, Demeyere S et al (1991) Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil Steril 55:759–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ek M, Roth B, Ekström P, Valentin L, Bengtsson M, Ohlsson B (2015) Gastrointestinal symptoms among endometriosis patients—a case-cohort study. BMC Women’s Health 15:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0213-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F et al (1995) Rectovaginal septum, endometriosis or adenomyosis: laparoscopic management in a series of 231 patients. Hum Reprod 10:630–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koninckx PR, Martin D (1994) Treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gyneco. 6:231–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AMC, Lagana’ AS (2017) Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and psychological well-being. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 38(4):317–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1244185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cosentino F, Turco LC, Ferrandina G et al (2017) Endometrial stromal sarcoma arising from endometriosis incidence, management and treatment of primary extrauterine localization. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. https://doi.org/10.5301/jeppd.5000287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duffy JM, Arambage K, Correa FJ et al (2014) Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD011031

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cosentino F, Vizzielli G, Turco LC et al (2018) Near-infrared imaging with indocyanine green for detection of endometriosis lesions (Gre-Endo Trial): a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(7):1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.02.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abrao MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C (2015) Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 21:329–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bassi MA, Podgaec S, Dias JA, D’Amico FN, Petta CA, Abrao MS (2011) Quality of life after segmental resection of the rectosigmoid by laparoscopy in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel involvement. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(6):730–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, Wolthuis A et al (2014) Clinical outcome after radical excision of moderate-severe endometriosis with or without bowel resection and reanastomosis a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg 259(3):522–531. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828dfc5c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roman H, Vassilieff M, Gourcerol G et al (2011) Surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum: pleading for a symptom-guided approach. Hum Reprod 26(2):274–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roman H, Vassilieff M, Tuech JJ et al (2013) Postoperative digestive function after radical versus conservative surgical philosophy for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. Fertil Steril 99(6):1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roman H, Loisel C, Resch B (2010) Delayed functional outcomes associated with surgical management of deep rectovaginal endometriosis with rectal involvement: giving patients an informed choice. Hum Reprod 25(4):890–899. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D’Hoore A et al (2011) Surgical treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement. Hum Reprod Update 17:311–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Daraï E, Bazot M, Rouzier R, Houry S, Dubernard G (2007) Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(4):308–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E et al (2018) Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 33(1):47–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kent A, Shakir F, Rockall T et al (2016) Laparoscopic surgery for severe rectovaginal endometriosis compromising the bowel: a prospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(4):526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lermann J, Topal N, Adler W (2018) Major and minor complications after resection without bowel resection for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(5):991–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4875-5Epub 2018 Sep 6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uccella S, Gisone B, Serati M et al (2018) Functional outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective analysis using validated questionnaires. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(3):639–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4852-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Renner SP, Kessler H, Topal N et al (2017) Major and minor complications after anterior rectal resection for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(5):1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4360-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dávalos M, De Cicco C, D’Hoore A, De Decker B, Koninckx P (2007) Outcome after rectum or sigmoid resection: a review for gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Pascual MA (2020) Ultrasonographic soft markers for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 55(2):269–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mabrouk M, Spagnolo E, Raimondo D et al (2012) Segmental bowel resection for colorectal endometriosis: is there a correlation between histological pattern and clinical outcomes? Hum Reprod 27(5):1314–1319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Bruni F et al (2012) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial. Surg Endosc 26(7):2029–2045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. The American Fertility Society (1985) Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985. Fertil Steril 43(3):351–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48430-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vlahos N, Vlachos A, Triantafyllidou O, Vitoratos N, Creatsas G (2013) Continuous versus cyclic use of oral contraceptives after surgery for symptomatic endometriosis: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 100(5):1337–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K et al (2016) Extended Clavien Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications Criteria. Surg Today 46(6):668–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nolen-Hoeksema S (2014) Abnormal psychology sixth edition. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, p 368 (ISBN 978-0-07-803538-8)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bourdel N, Alves J, Pickering G, Ramilo I, Roman H, Canis M (2015) Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: how to choose a scale? Hum Reprod Update 21(1):136–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, Crawley J (1998) Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res 7(1):75–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kulich KR, Calabrese C, Pacini F, Vigneri S, Carlsson J, Wiklund IK (2004) Psychometric validation of the Italian translation of the Gastrointestinal Symptom-Rating Scale and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Questionnaire in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Clin Drug Investig 24(4):205–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kulich KR, Madisch A, Pacini F et al (2008) Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) Questionnaire in dyspepsia: a six-country study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tack J, Talley NJ (2013) Functional dyspepsia-symptoms, definitions and validity of the Rome III criteria. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(3):134–141. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.14Epub 2013 Feb 12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Turco LC, Scaldaferri F, Chiantera V et al (2020) Long-term evaluation of quality of life and gastrointestinal well-being after segmental colo-rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis (ENDO-RESECT QoL). Arch Gynecol Obstet 301(1):217–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05382-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tarjanne S, Heikinheimo O, Mentula M, Härkki P (2015) Complications and long-term follow-up on colorectal resections in the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis extending to bowel wall. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zilberman S, Ballester M, Touboul C et al (2013) Partial colpectomy is a risk factor for urologic complications of colorectal resection for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.08.775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Keckstein J, Wiesinger H (2005) Deep endometriosis, including intestinal involvement—the interdisciplinary approach. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14017430510035916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ruffo G, Scopelliti F, Scioscia M, Ceccaroni M, Mainardi P, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 436 cases. Surg Endosc 24:63–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0517-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E et al (2019) Baseline severe constipation negatively impacts functional outcomes of surgery for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: results of the ENDORE randomized trial. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bassi MA, Andres MP, Morales BC et al (2019) Postoperative bowel symptoms improve over time after rectosigmoidectomy for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Balla A, Quaresima S, Subiela JD, Shalaby M, Petrella G, Sileri P (2018) Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(7):835–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3082-y(Epub 2018 May 10)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jayot A, Timoh KN, Bendifallah S, Ballester M, Daraï E (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic discoid resection and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis using a propensity score matching analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 25(3):440–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.019(Epub 2017 Oct 5)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Marcello PW, Brady KM, Falcone T (2002) Laparoscopic resection of deep pelvic endometriosis with rectosigmoid involvement. J Am Coll Surg 195:754–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. De Cicco C, Corona R, Schonman R, Mailova K, Ussia A, Koninckx PR (2011) Bowel resection for deep endometriosis: a systematic review. BJOG 118:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Slack A, Child T, Lindsey I et al (2007) Urological and colorectal complications following surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis. BJOG 114(10):1278–1282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dubernard G, Piketty M, Rouzier R, Houry S, Bazot M, Daraï E (2006) Quality of life after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Hum Reprod 21:1243–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Daraï E, Zilberman S, Touboul C, Chereau E, Rouzier R, Ballester M (2012) Urological morbidity of colorectal resection for endometriosis. Minerva Med 103(1):63–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dubernard G, Rouzier R, David-Montefiore E, Bazot M, Daraï E (2008) Urinary complications after surgery for posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis are related to the extent of dissection and to uterosacral ligaments resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(2):235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lermann J, Topal N, Renner SP, Beckmann MW, Burghaus S, Adler W, Heindl F (2019) Comparison of preoperative and postoperative sexual function in patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis with and without bowel resection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 239:21–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, Ruffo G (2013) Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical considerations for a nerve-sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc 27(11):4386–4394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3043-z(Epub 2013 Jun 20 PMID: 23783554)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Alboni C, Ruffo G, Bruni F, Roviglione G, Scioscia M, Peters I, De Placido G, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing transperitoneal approach for endometriosis infiltrating the pelvic wall and somatic nerves: anatomical considerations and surgical technique. Surg Radiol Anat 32(6):601–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0624-6(Epub 2010 Jan 20 PMID:20087591)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Landi S, Ceccaroni M, Perutelli A, Allodi C, Barbieri F, Fiaccavento A, Ruffo G, McVeigh E, Zanolla L, Minelli L (2006) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing complete excision of deep endometriosis: is it feasible? Hum Reprod 21(3):774–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei324(Epub 2006 Jan 31. PMID: 16449312)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Uccella S, Marconi N, Casarin J et al (2016) Impact of endometriosis on surgical outcomes and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294(4):771–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4115-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Serati M, Cattoni E, Braga A, Uccella S, Cromi A, Ghezzi F (2013) Deep endometriosis and bladder and detrusor functions in women without urinary symptoms: a pilot study through an unexplored world. Fertil Steril 100(5):1332–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sarrel PM, Sullivan SD, Nelson LM (2016) Hormone replacement therapy in young women with surgical primary ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril 106(7):1580–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.018(published online 2016 Oct 25)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Richard Renston M.D. for his important contribution in revising the form and the English language of this article.

Funding

This study did not receive any found.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Carlo Turco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

R. R. have no conflict of interest to declare. Author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (no. PROT. APROV. IST CICOG-31-10-18\100) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turco, L.C., Tortorella, L., Tuscano, A. et al. Surgery-related complications and long-term functional morbidity after segmental colo-rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis (ENDO-RESECT morb). Arch Gynecol Obstet 302, 983–993 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05694-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05694-0

Keywords

Navigation