Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to the authors’ response to the letter to the editor concerning the article “Randomized control trial on the effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy", by Ikechebelu et al.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JN drafting and reviewing the manuscript. SA reviewing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Nassif.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Joseph Nassif and Soroush Aalipour declare no conflict of interests for drafting this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nassif, J., Aalipour, S. Reply to the authors’ response to the letter to the editor concerning the article “Randomized control trial on the effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy", by Ikechebelu et al.. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307, 2051–2052 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06715-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06715-w

Navigation