Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Forensic evaluation of alleged wrist restraint/handcuff injuries in survivors of torture utilizing the Istanbul Protocol

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Despite being a common form of abuse, there is a paucity of literature describing shackling and wrist restraint injuries among survivors of torture. Forensic evaluation of alleged wrist restraint/handcuff injuries in survivors of torture presents challenges to the evaluator, especially if the injuries are remote and do not leave lasting marks nor neurologic deficits. Thorough history-taking and physical examination are critical to effective forensic documentation. Guidance is provided in The Manual on Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Istanbul Protocol), the gold standard for the medicolegal documentation of torture. This guidance relies primarily on physical findings, with less direction provided on how to interpret historical evidence or when historical evidence provided by the patient can be interpreted as highly consistent with alleged injury in the absence of current physical findings. Through a case-based review, we present diagnostic strategies for the evaluation of alleged abuse involving wrist restraints/handcuffs, focusing on skin, neurologic, and osseous injuries. We highlight key findings from both the history and physical examination that will allow the evaluator to improve the accuracy of their expert medical opinion on the degree to which medical findings correlate with the patient’s allegations of wrist restraint injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable

Change history

References

  1. UN General Assembly (1984). Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment – Article 1. Accessed from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cat.aspx. Accessed 3 Dec 2020

  2. Moreno A, Grodin MA (2002) Torture and its neurological sequelae. Spinal Cord 40:213–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghaleb SS, Elshabrawy EM, Elkaradawy MH, Welson NN (2014) Retrospective study of positive physical torture cases in Cairo (2009 & 2010). J For Leg Med 24:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/jflm.2014.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2004) Istanbul Protocol – Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Accessed from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/training8Rev1en.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2020

  5. Howard JD (2005) Restraint techniques, injuries and death. Encyclopedia For Leg Med:541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369399-3/00310-4

  6. Chariot P, Ragot F, Authier FJ, Questel F, Diamant-Berger O (2001) Focal neurological complications of handcuff application. J For Sci 46(5):1124–1125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grant AC, Cook AA (2000) A prospective study of handcuff neuropathies. Muscle & Nerve 23(6):933–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(200006)23:6<933::aid-mus14>3.0.co;2-g

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Richmond PW, Fligelstone LJ, Lewis E (1988) Injuries caused by handcuffs. 297(6641):111–112. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6641.111

  9. Haddad FS, Goddard NJ, Kanvinde RN, Burke F (1999) Complaints of pain after use of handcuffs should not be dismissed. BMJ 318(7175):55. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ball L, Ferran NA, Barton CR (2008) Scaphoid fracture due to rigid handcuffs. J Hand Surg Euro 33(4):484–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193408089055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hilton M, Yngve D, Carmichael KD (2006) Proximal humerus fractures sustained during the use of restraints in adolescents. J Ped Ortho 26(1):50–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Human Rights Watch (2019) Mali: Detainee Restraints Causing Grievous Injuries. Accessed from https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/10/02/mali-detainee-restraints-causing-grievous-injuries. Accessed 3 Dec 2020

  13. Stone DA, Laureno R (1991) Handcuff neuropathies. Neurology 41:145–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kantarci MN, Kandemir E, Berber G, Bastürk M, Korur Fincanci S (2013) Evaluation of plastic and metal handcuff-related injuries under custody in medical examinations. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 33(2):360–365. https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2012-28651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrlich W, Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE (1986) Classical article: cheiralgia paresthetica (entrapment of the radial sensory nerve). A translation in condensed form of Robert Wartenberg’s original article published in 1932. J Hand Surg Am 11(2):196–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80050-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dorfman LJ, Jayaram AR (1978) Handcuff neuropathy. JAMA 239:957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Massey EW, Pleet AB (1978) Handcuffs and cheiralgia paresthetica. Neurology 28:1312–1313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith MS (1981) Correspondence: handcuff neuropathy. Ann Emerg Med 10(12):668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE (1986) Radial sensory nerve entrapment in the forearm. J Hand Surg Am 11(2):199–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Anthony JH, Hadeed A, Hoffler CE (2019). Cheiralgia Paresthetica. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, 2020 Jan-, Treasure Island (FL). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545200/. Accessed 3 Dec 2020

  21. Taylor A, Giddins G (2017) Post-traumatic de Quervain’s syndrome: a rare condition, often diagnosed late. J Hand Surg Eur 42(5):524–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416646722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. González-Iglesias J, Huijbregts P, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Cleland JA (2010) Differential diagnosis and physical therapy management of a patient with radial wrist pain of 6 months’ duration: a case. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40(6):361–368. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson LR, Henderson M (1994) Handcuff neuropathy involving the dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve. Muscle Nerve 17(1):113–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheean G, Morris JG (1993) Handcuff neuropathy involving the dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve. Muscle Nerve 16(3):325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Satkunam L, Zochodne DW (1995) Bilateral ulnar handcuff neuropathies with segmental conduction block. Muscle Nerve 18(9):1021–1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880180916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mansuripur PK, Deren ME, Kamal R (2013) Nerve compression syndromes of the upper extremity: diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. R I Med J 96(5):37–39

    Google Scholar 

  27. An WT, Evanoff BA, Boyer MI, Osei DA (2017) The prevalence of cubital tunnel syndrome: a cross-sectional study in a U.S. metropolitan cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(5):408–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Miriam Y. Neufeld is supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health T32 Training Grant (GM86308).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA

    Miriam Y. Neufeld, Sarah Kimball, Andrew B. Stein & Sondra S. Crosby

  2. Immigrant & Refugee Health Center, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 725 Albany Street, Suite 5b, Boston, MA, 02118, USA

    Sarah Kimball & Sondra S. Crosby

  3. Boston University School of Public Health, Center for Health Law, Ethics, and Human Rights, 715 Albany St, Talbot Building 3 W, Boston, MA, 02118, USA

    Sondra S. Crosby

Authors
  1. Miriam Y. Neufeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Kimball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew B. Stein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sondra S. Crosby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study conception: Sondra S. Crosby, Sarah Kimball

Literature review: Miriam Y. Neufeld, Sondra S. Crosby

Data interpretation: Miriam Y. Neufeld, Sarah Kimball, Andrew B. Stein, Sondra S. Crosby

All authors contributed to manuscript drafting and/or critical review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sondra S. Crosby.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Ethics approval

This study utilized anonymized case studies which, after consultation with the Institutational Review Board (IRB) of Boston University and the privacy office of Boston Medical Center, was deemed not require IRB approval and was deemed to be in accordance with institutional ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Not applicable as cases have been anonymized and no recognizable details have been included

Consent to publish

Not applicable as cases have been anonymized and no recognizable details have been included

Code availability

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neufeld, M.Y., Kimball, S., Stein, A.B. et al. Forensic evaluation of alleged wrist restraint/handcuff injuries in survivors of torture utilizing the Istanbul Protocol. Int J Legal Med 135, 583–590 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02451-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02451-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation